DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
80beats
« A Vaccine to Fight Alzheimer’s Fails, but an Allergy Medicine Shows Promise
Researchers Grow a Blood Vessel Network From a Few “Progenitor” Cells »

Nuclear Fusion Researcher Found Guilty of Scientific Misconduct

sun fusionA researcher who stirred up controversy when he claimed to have carried out nuclear fusion in a table-top experiment has been found guilty of scientific misconduct by a panel at Purdue University.  Many scientists have been eager to develop nuclear fusion — the process that powers the sun — as an unlimited source of clean energy and an alternative to fossil fuels. But scientists have struggled to unlock the secrets of fusion energy [Reuters].

In 2002, the researcher, Rusi P. Taleyarkhan, announced that he had carried out fusion at room temperature and using relatively cheap materials, and his results were trumpeted on the cover of the prestigious journal Science. The article was published over the vehement objections of several reviewers and was heavily criticized by other physicists [Los Angeles Times]. Now, the Purdue panel’s findings of scientific misconduct cast further doubts on the validity of Taleyarkhan’s experiments.  

In his original journal article, Taleyarkhan claimed that sound waves can collapse bubbles in a liquid with enough force to generate fusion and liberate excess energy. The result raised the promise of limitless energy and spurred numerous early attempts to replicate the work, all of which failed [ScienceNOW Daily News]. 

The misconduct relates to Taleyarkhan’s assertion that his findings had been duplicated and thus verified by an independent team. The panel found that although the follow-up experiment was attributed to a post-doctorate fellow in Taleyarkhan’s lab, the professor was heavily involved in the work. The panel also found that Taleyarkhan added the name of another researcher to the paper that was published as a result of the follow-up experiment, although that scientist had not been directly involved in the research.

The panel did not investigate the validity of Taleyarkhan’s original work, but its findings are a blow to the professor’s credibility. “From small beginnings there developed a tangled web of wishful thinking, scientific misjudgment, institutional lapses and human failings,” the committee wrote [AP].

Image: SOHO/Extreme Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT) consortium

Share

July 21st, 2008 9:00 AM Tags: nuclear energy, nuclear fusion, scientific misconduct
by Eliza Strickland in Physics & Math | 2 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

2 Responses to “Nuclear Fusion Researcher Found Guilty of Scientific Misconduct”

  1. 1.   Marshall Charmichale Says:
    July 21st, 2008 at 11:14 am

    Hmmm…there’s something fishy going on here. I can’t help but feel that the wrong party is being accused of misconduct.

    I recall the “panel” from Purdue finding Dr. Taleyarkhan NOT GUILTY of research misconduct a while back. But then Congress came in and demanded the “case be reopened,” which given the results of this recent ‘investigation,’ was in effect a demand from Congress to find him guilty. And there’s reason to believe that this demand was the brainchild of none other than the detractors, led by the nuclear engineering (NE) faculty from Purdue.

    Also, in light of the juvenile (MIS-?)conduct of the whistle blower NE faculty members, I am surprised that THEY are allowed to go scot-free. They had gone out of their way to first take to the PRESS, of all places, the accusations of misconduct, rather than following the rules/regulations of research (and university policy) to express their concerns.

    Apparently, Purdue found out about these accusations at the same time the public did.

    Why do you suppose they took that route?…i.e., screaming out to the press that there was research misconduct afoot?

    Quite likely because the whistle blowers know, like many others, of Purdue’s obsession with preeminence, and bad publicity against their own administration would prove to burst bubbles of those dreams of being #1? So they’ve got the unwritten satisfaction of knowing that, no matter what their crime, Purdue will protect them.

    Coincidentally, the former HEAD (ah, an administrator) of nuclear engineering (NE) WAS the primary instigator of these accusations against Taleyarkhan. I recall reading of his having to “resign” his position as head of Purdue NE not long after Purdue was shaking with the aftershock of these stories he and his cohorts personally saw to it that all the primary news stations carried.

    I must say, those guys at Purdue really do know how to put on a good show. Do they think they’re fooling everyone?!

  2. 2.   low priced heel inserts Says:
    July 24th, 2011 at 2:04 am

    You truly know your details… Keep up the great job!

Leave a Reply





    • 80beats Daily Newsletter

      Enter your email address:

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • RSS Feed

      The RSS feed for 80beats is here RSS.

    • Sci News in 140

      rockahn.net
    • on 80beats

      Recent Comments

      Comments

      • LEE on Who Would Win in a (Legal) Fight: A Whale or a Battleship?
      • LEE on It’s a Small and Wonderful World: Stunning Images of Science Under the Microscope
      • Susan Durham on The Engineer Who Has “Saved More Lives Than Any Single Person in the History of Aviation”
      • Susan Durham on How Spider Silk’s Molecular Make-up Lets It Morph
      • Messier Tidy Upper on Who Would Win in a (Legal) Fight: A Whale or a Battleship?
      • Messier Tidy Upper on Solar Sleuthing Suggests When Odysseus Got Home: April 16, 1178 B.C.
      RSS Recent Posts

      Posts

      • To Escape Chinese Espionage, You Must Travel “Electronically Naked”
      • Why We Can’t Just Get Rid of the Genes That Let Us Get Infected
      • Cancer Drug Today, Alzheimer’s Drug Tomorrow? Hopeful Results in Mouse Study
      • Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      Categories

      Categories

      • Environment
      • Feature
      • Health & Medicine
      • Human Origins
      • Journal Roundup
      • Living World
      • Mind & Brain
      • News Roundup
      • Photo Gallery
      • Physics & Math
      • Space
      • Technology
      • Top Posts
      • Uncategorized
      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
    • About 80beats

      80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles on the day's most compelling topics.

      80beats is written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. This team darts through each day's science news faster than the ruby-throated hummingbird that beats its wings 80 times per second. Send ideas, tips, suggestions, and complaints to [azeeberg at discovermagazine dot com].



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us