<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Men Over 75 Can Skip the Prostate Cancer Screening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/05/men-over-75-can-skip-the-prostate-cancer-screening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/05/men-over-75-can-skip-the-prostate-cancer-screening/</link>
	<description>80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day\'s most compelling topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:16:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/05/men-over-75-can-skip-the-prostate-cancer-screening/comment-page-1/#comment-55004</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/05/men-over-75-can-skip-the-prostate-cancer-screening/#comment-55004</guid>
		<description>Medical is so hard to sort. For instance, the approach to have everyone visiting a dentist every six months or a year to check for cavities likely leads many people to have a mouthful of fillings they didn&#039;t really need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medical is so hard to sort. For instance, the approach to have everyone visiting a dentist every six months or a year to check for cavities likely leads many people to have a mouthful of fillings they didn&#8217;t really need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Spencer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/05/men-over-75-can-skip-the-prostate-cancer-screening/comment-page-1/#comment-29225</link>
		<dc:creator>J Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/05/men-over-75-can-skip-the-prostate-cancer-screening/#comment-29225</guid>
		<description>JoJo, I guess I don&#039;t understand what you mean, health insurane freely available to all US citizens regardless of employment. You can have health insurance now, just go to an insurance company like State Farm. What you want is free health care. Someone has to pay for it, so to say free is a right, I don&#039;t agree, and part of the problem with health care costs today. Too many just take the attitude that I don&#039;t want to pay for health insurance, if something comes up, I will get help for free. While it is true that hospitals and doctors cannot refuse treatment, al that does is put a burden on those who do pay. 

I for one think everyone should pay for health care. Yes, it can be structured on the ability to pay, based on wages, but what I hate is when someone earning $100,000 decides not to get health insurance, and then wants free treatment when they can afford the insurance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JoJo, I guess I don&#8217;t understand what you mean, health insurane freely available to all US citizens regardless of employment. You can have health insurance now, just go to an insurance company like State Farm. What you want is free health care. Someone has to pay for it, so to say free is a right, I don&#8217;t agree, and part of the problem with health care costs today. Too many just take the attitude that I don&#8217;t want to pay for health insurance, if something comes up, I will get help for free. While it is true that hospitals and doctors cannot refuse treatment, al that does is put a burden on those who do pay. </p>
<p>I for one think everyone should pay for health care. Yes, it can be structured on the ability to pay, based on wages, but what I hate is when someone earning $100,000 decides not to get health insurance, and then wants free treatment when they can afford the insurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jojo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/05/men-over-75-can-skip-the-prostate-cancer-screening/comment-page-1/#comment-2742</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/05/men-over-75-can-skip-the-prostate-cancer-screening/#comment-2742</guid>
		<description>I always love these debates on medical care.  But since medical insurance is becoming a perk available only for those in high-level white-collar or union jobs, what are the rest of us supposed to do for medical care, let alone preventive care???

The number of 47 million w/o medical insurance keeps getting quoted but this number seems to have stayed the same for at least the last 5 years.  I believe that this number is significantly higher now and I am one of them.  And this number does not include those with only catastrophic insurance who also cannot afford go to a doctor for preventive examinations or care.

I haven&#039;t been to a doctor or dentist in two years because it is just too expensive to pay for the the charges and usual tests without insurance to back you up.  The last prostate screening I had was over 2 years ago when I had my last physical exam (I had a medical plan at that time).  I have never had a colonoscopy.  

If I should develop some serious disease or sickness, by the time it is discovered, it may be because I was rushed to a hospital but will be too far advanced for me to survive it.  

Basic health insurance with preventative care should be freely available to all U.S. citizens, regardless of employment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always love these debates on medical care.  But since medical insurance is becoming a perk available only for those in high-level white-collar or union jobs, what are the rest of us supposed to do for medical care, let alone preventive care???</p>
<p>The number of 47 million w/o medical insurance keeps getting quoted but this number seems to have stayed the same for at least the last 5 years.  I believe that this number is significantly higher now and I am one of them.  And this number does not include those with only catastrophic insurance who also cannot afford go to a doctor for preventive examinations or care.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t been to a doctor or dentist in two years because it is just too expensive to pay for the the charges and usual tests without insurance to back you up.  The last prostate screening I had was over 2 years ago when I had my last physical exam (I had a medical plan at that time).  I have never had a colonoscopy.  </p>
<p>If I should develop some serious disease or sickness, by the time it is discovered, it may be because I was rushed to a hospital but will be too far advanced for me to survive it.  </p>
<p>Basic health insurance with preventative care should be freely available to all U.S. citizens, regardless of employment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Turnham</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/05/men-over-75-can-skip-the-prostate-cancer-screening/comment-page-1/#comment-2387</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Turnham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/05/men-over-75-can-skip-the-prostate-cancer-screening/#comment-2387</guid>
		<description>This week we heard that screening for prostate cancer may do more harm than good—particularly for older men.  I understand that, I suppose.  Prostate cancer tends to grow slowly, and the significance of test results is not entirely clear.

I worry that in a twist of logic we will generalize a very specific recommendation.  I worry that the message will shift from “Men over 75 should not be screened for prostate cancer” to “No-one should be screened for prostate cancer” to (and this is the scariest part) “I shouldn’t be screened for any cancer.”

Every day in the United States more than 100 people die of colorectal cancer because they weren’t screened when they should have been.  Every day.   

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in this country, yet a simple screening will reduce the risk of having this disease by 80% or more.

The debate about prostate cancer screening will go on for a long time.  One thing is not debatable though—cancer screening in general, and screening for colon cancer in particular, saves lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week we heard that screening for prostate cancer may do more harm than good—particularly for older men.  I understand that, I suppose.  Prostate cancer tends to grow slowly, and the significance of test results is not entirely clear.</p>
<p>I worry that in a twist of logic we will generalize a very specific recommendation.  I worry that the message will shift from “Men over 75 should not be screened for prostate cancer” to “No-one should be screened for prostate cancer” to (and this is the scariest part) “I shouldn’t be screened for any cancer.”</p>
<p>Every day in the United States more than 100 people die of colorectal cancer because they weren’t screened when they should have been.  Every day.   </p>
<p>Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in this country, yet a simple screening will reduce the risk of having this disease by 80% or more.</p>
<p>The debate about prostate cancer screening will go on for a long time.  One thing is not debatable though—cancer screening in general, and screening for colon cancer in particular, saves lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
