Comments on: Prosecuters Say They Had Enough to Convict Deceased Anthrax Suspect http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/07/prosecuters-say-they-had-enough-to-convict-deceased-anthrax-suspect/ 80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day\'s most compelling topics. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:36:58 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Eliza Strickland http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/07/prosecuters-say-they-had-enough-to-convict-deceased-anthrax-suspect/comment-page-1/#comment-3341 Eliza Strickland Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:22:34 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/07/prosecuters-say-they-had-enough-to-convict-deceased-anthrax-suspect/#comment-3341 The claim that the anthrax came from Iraq's biological weapons program was put forward by ABC News, and was indeed based on info from unnamed sources. A lot of journalists and commentators are now saying that ABC should have to answer some questions about this incident: http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/01/anthrax/index.html http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/08/03/abc-has-major-questions-to-answer-in-anthrax-story/ The claim that the anthrax came from Iraq’s biological weapons program was put forward by ABC News, and was indeed based on info from unnamed sources. A lot of journalists and commentators are now saying that ABC should have to answer some questions about this incident:

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/01/anthrax/index.html
http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/08/03/abc-has-major-questions-to-answer-in-anthrax-story/

]]> By: Matthew http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/07/prosecuters-say-they-had-enough-to-convict-deceased-anthrax-suspect/comment-page-1/#comment-2538 Matthew Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:06:57 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/07/prosecuters-say-they-had-enough-to-convict-deceased-anthrax-suspect/#comment-2538 How can they have the right man as this was claimed - and evidence produced by un-named government sources - as being concrete evidence of an attack by Al Qaida and Saddam Hussein. Did we therefore go to war for spurious - and made up - reasons? How can they have the right man as this was claimed – and evidence produced by un-named government sources – as being concrete evidence of an attack by Al Qaida and Saddam Hussein. Did we therefore go to war for spurious – and made up – reasons?

]]>