<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Manned Craft Definitely Won&#8217;t Launch until 2014, NASA Says</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/12/new-manned-craft-definitely-wont-launch-until-2014-nasa-says/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/12/new-manned-craft-definitely-wont-launch-until-2014-nasa-says/</link>
	<description>80beats is DISCOVER&#039;s news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day\&#039;s most compelling topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:44:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BulldogGK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/12/new-manned-craft-definitely-wont-launch-until-2014-nasa-says/comment-page-1/#comment-5817</link>
		<dc:creator>BulldogGK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/12/new-manned-craft-definitely-wont-launch-until-2014-nasa-says/#comment-5817</guid>
		<description>What is the shuttle, then?  A rocket mounted to an orbiter?  The Apollo capsules could travel further, more frequently, safer, and most importantly for much less money than the shuttle.  The shuttle is meant to be a heavy lifter and a mobile science lab, but now we have the ISS for the experiments.  Heavy lifting can be done by other means that don&#039;t require a maintenance bill of $4 billion per year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the shuttle, then?  A rocket mounted to an orbiter?  The Apollo capsules could travel further, more frequently, safer, and most importantly for much less money than the shuttle.  The shuttle is meant to be a heavy lifter and a mobile science lab, but now we have the ISS for the experiments.  Heavy lifting can be done by other means that don&#8217;t require a maintenance bill of $4 billion per year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jojo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/12/new-manned-craft-definitely-wont-launch-until-2014-nasa-says/comment-page-1/#comment-2738</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/12/new-manned-craft-definitely-wont-launch-until-2014-nasa-says/#comment-2738</guid>
		<description>Orion sure seems like a step backward, as NASA regresses to the days of the Apollo capsule that requires being mounted on a large rocket to get into space.  This is what many billions of dollars gets us???  Are they going to be gluing heat-proof tiles on this one also?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orion sure seems like a step backward, as NASA regresses to the days of the Apollo capsule that requires being mounted on a large rocket to get into space.  This is what many billions of dollars gets us???  Are they going to be gluing heat-proof tiles on this one also?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
