<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Entangled Particles Seem to Communicate Instantly—and Befuddle Scientists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/</link>
	<description>80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day\'s most compelling topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:03:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-45412</link>
		<dc:creator>cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-45412</guid>
		<description>And to further simplify this explanation: Real-time or instantaneous communication is only possible if you live in a universe where time was constanst for every observer. But we don&#039;t live in that universe. Time runs at different rates. It moves or slows down depending on how fast you&#039;re moving relative to everything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to further simplify this explanation: Real-time or instantaneous communication is only possible if you live in a universe where time was constanst for every observer. But we don&#8217;t live in that universe. Time runs at different rates. It moves or slows down depending on how fast you&#8217;re moving relative to everything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-45384</link>
		<dc:creator>cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-45384</guid>
		<description>And if that was a bit difficult to grasp (hence why Enstein was considered smart!), then understand that what you observe will always be different from what the person on Mars observes because of time dilation (time slows down as you move faster). So you can never agree on what is happening in &quot;real-time&quot; or &quot;simultaneously&quot;. 

And Since the two of you can&#039;t agree on &quot;when&quot; things happen, it&#039;s possible that you will get a faster-than-light message that seems to predict your future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if that was a bit difficult to grasp (hence why Enstein was considered smart!), then understand that what you observe will always be different from what the person on Mars observes because of time dilation (time slows down as you move faster). So you can never agree on what is happening in &#8220;real-time&#8221; or &#8220;simultaneously&#8221;. </p>
<p>And Since the two of you can&#8217;t agree on &#8220;when&#8221; things happen, it&#8217;s possible that you will get a faster-than-light message that seems to predict your future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-45377</link>
		<dc:creator>cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-45377</guid>
		<description>@ .jad

Here is the reason why a faster-than-light signal would be travelling through time:

If one were able to move information or matter from one point to another faster than light, then according to special relativity, there would be some inertial frame of reference in which the signal or object was moving backwards in time. This is a consequence of the relativity of simultaneity in special relativity, which says that in some cases different reference frames will disagree on whether two events at different locations happened &quot;at the same time&quot; or not, and they can also disagree on the order of the two events (technically, these disagreements occur when spacetime interval between the events is &#039;space-like&#039;, meaning that neither event lies in the future light cone of the other).[19] If one of the two events represents the sending of a signal from one location and the second event represents the reception of the same signal at another location, then as long as the signal is moving at the speed of light or slower, the mathematics of simultaneity ensures that all reference frames agree that the transmission-event happened before the reception-event.[19]

However, in the case of a hypothetical signal moving faster than light, there would always be some frames in which the signal was received before it was sent, so that the signal could be said to have moved backwards in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ .jad</p>
<p>Here is the reason why a faster-than-light signal would be travelling through time:</p>
<p>If one were able to move information or matter from one point to another faster than light, then according to special relativity, there would be some inertial frame of reference in which the signal or object was moving backwards in time. This is a consequence of the relativity of simultaneity in special relativity, which says that in some cases different reference frames will disagree on whether two events at different locations happened &#8220;at the same time&#8221; or not, and they can also disagree on the order of the two events (technically, these disagreements occur when spacetime interval between the events is &#8217;space-like&#8217;, meaning that neither event lies in the future light cone of the other).[19] If one of the two events represents the sending of a signal from one location and the second event represents the reception of the same signal at another location, then as long as the signal is moving at the speed of light or slower, the mathematics of simultaneity ensures that all reference frames agree that the transmission-event happened before the reception-event.[19]</p>
<p>However, in the case of a hypothetical signal moving faster than light, there would always be some frames in which the signal was received before it was sent, so that the signal could be said to have moved backwards in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .jad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-32597</link>
		<dc:creator>.jad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-32597</guid>
		<description>Loose the concept that communicating faster than the speed of light would be sending information back in time.  You are confusing observation with time.  

If a mars rover uses an &quot;entangled particle transceiver&quot; to send data back to NASA saying it fell over the rim of a crater, the communication is more &quot;real-time&quot; than anything else.

An astronomer watching the rover fall over the edge is getting the information after the delay caused by the limits of the speed of light.

Nothing went back in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loose the concept that communicating faster than the speed of light would be sending information back in time.  You are confusing observation with time.  </p>
<p>If a mars rover uses an &#8220;entangled particle transceiver&#8221; to send data back to NASA saying it fell over the rim of a crater, the communication is more &#8220;real-time&#8221; than anything else.</p>
<p>An astronomer watching the rover fall over the edge is getting the information after the delay caused by the limits of the speed of light.</p>
<p>Nothing went back in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-27825</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-27825</guid>
		<description>Among the many questions arising from quantum entanglement, there seems to be one concerning whether such knowledge could be *harnessed*. For example, could it lead to an advanced form of communication, even across cosmological distances? What about the possibility of &#039;quantum-state telescopes&#039; and &#039;quantum-state trancseivers&#039;?  It seems to me that some recent research may have brought us a step closer to realizing some of these ideas...

Dr Lene Hau and her Harvard-based team has managed to non-randomly alter the quantum states of atoms via light, and, vice versa. The researchers have shown that light can be slowed to a bicycle speed and even stopped(!) within a laser-supercooled Bose-Einstein-Condensate (BEC) of sodium. The temperature of the condensate is a few billionths of a degree above absolute zero. At such a temperature the sodium atoms share the same low quantum state behaving en masse like a &quot;super-particle&quot;. The researchers then trained two lasers on this condensate: the first, a coupling beam; and the other a probe beam. Via their manipulation or &#039;wavelength-tuning&#039; of the sodium condensate with the coupling beam, they were then able to get the condensate to slow down the probe laser light and bring the light to a complete stop within the condensate! During the deceleration, the laser beam light pulse shrank from a length of several kilometers to just tens of microns, fitting entirely within the sodium condensate cloud! The probe light left a kind of holographic imprint in the BCE atoms, and the researchers were able to manipulate/process that &#039;stored light&#039; via electric- and magnetic fields. They were able to coherently transfer (change) BEC sodium atoms from one quantum mechanical state to another. 

For full article/discussion see here
 http://www.seas.harvard.edu/haulab/publications/pdf/OPN_Ultraslow_light.pdf
mini video here of Dr Lene Hau discussing her work: http://www.nature.com/nature/videoarchive/trickofthelight/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the many questions arising from quantum entanglement, there seems to be one concerning whether such knowledge could be *harnessed*. For example, could it lead to an advanced form of communication, even across cosmological distances? What about the possibility of &#8216;quantum-state telescopes&#8217; and &#8216;quantum-state trancseivers&#8217;?  It seems to me that some recent research may have brought us a step closer to realizing some of these ideas&#8230;</p>
<p>Dr Lene Hau and her Harvard-based team has managed to non-randomly alter the quantum states of atoms via light, and, vice versa. The researchers have shown that light can be slowed to a bicycle speed and even stopped(!) within a laser-supercooled Bose-Einstein-Condensate (BEC) of sodium. The temperature of the condensate is a few billionths of a degree above absolute zero. At such a temperature the sodium atoms share the same low quantum state behaving en masse like a &#8220;super-particle&#8221;. The researchers then trained two lasers on this condensate: the first, a coupling beam; and the other a probe beam. Via their manipulation or &#8216;wavelength-tuning&#8217; of the sodium condensate with the coupling beam, they were then able to get the condensate to slow down the probe laser light and bring the light to a complete stop within the condensate! During the deceleration, the laser beam light pulse shrank from a length of several kilometers to just tens of microns, fitting entirely within the sodium condensate cloud! The probe light left a kind of holographic imprint in the BCE atoms, and the researchers were able to manipulate/process that &#8217;stored light&#8217; via electric- and magnetic fields. They were able to coherently transfer (change) BEC sodium atoms from one quantum mechanical state to another. </p>
<p>For full article/discussion see here<br />
 <a href="http://www.seas.harvard.edu/haulab/publications/pdf/OPN_Ultraslow_light.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.seas.harvard.edu/haulab/publications/pdf/OPN_Ultraslow_light.pdf</a><br />
mini video here of Dr Lene Hau discussing her work: <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/videoarchive/trickofthelight/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature.com/nature/videoarchive/trickofthelight/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-19644</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-19644</guid>
		<description>mark, very good, we also see how string theory is proposing to prove that there are something like 11 spatial dimensions in some of them time is reversed, which would also explain the electron equation. 

it just gets too crazy at this level of understanding, we aren&#039;t living in 3 dimensions we&#039;re living in 11 we just dont see anything but 3 spatial dimensions because of gravity. all other dimensions are overlayed on our space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mark, very good, we also see how string theory is proposing to prove that there are something like 11 spatial dimensions in some of them time is reversed, which would also explain the electron equation. </p>
<p>it just gets too crazy at this level of understanding, we aren&#8217;t living in 3 dimensions we&#8217;re living in 11 we just dont see anything but 3 spatial dimensions because of gravity. all other dimensions are overlayed on our space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-9483</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-9483</guid>
		<description>I think the photons are separated in 3 dimensional space, but are in the same place in some other dimension.  Extra dimensions also explains how small particles (e.g., electrons) can jump instantly from one place to another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the photons are separated in 3 dimensional space, but are in the same place in some other dimension.  Extra dimensions also explains how small particles (e.g., electrons) can jump instantly from one place to another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Ozols</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-3669</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Ozols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-3669</guid>
		<description>Faster than light travel is an appealing idea, especially 10000x light speed. However,  although my knowledge in this arena is by no means professional, might I suggest that travel between two &#039;points&#039; might not violate any rules if the travel occurs in dimensions other than 1-4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faster than light travel is an appealing idea, especially 10000x light speed. However,  although my knowledge in this arena is by no means professional, might I suggest that travel between two &#8216;points&#8217; might not violate any rules if the travel occurs in dimensions other than 1-4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-3147</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-3147</guid>
		<description>I saw  in one of the links, &#039;...Dr Charles Bennett of IBM and others theorised that entanglement can make a &quot;quantum phoneline&quot; that could &quot;teleport&quot; the details (quantum state) of one particle to another over an arbitrary distance without knowing its state.&#039;

While the article concludes that &#039;the contents of those notes are beyond our control, and so can&#039;t be used to transmit any useful messages.&#039;, I certainly would rule it out.  So, there&#039;s a handy way to transmit binary data over arbitrary distances.. maybe? That would be nice.

Myke, I think what they are saying is that altering the state of one electron affected the other one, for reasons that can only be explained by their theory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw  in one of the links, &#8216;&#8230;Dr Charles Bennett of IBM and others theorised that entanglement can make a &#8220;quantum phoneline&#8221; that could &#8220;teleport&#8221; the details (quantum state) of one particle to another over an arbitrary distance without knowing its state.&#8217;</p>
<p>While the article concludes that &#8216;the contents of those notes are beyond our control, and so can&#8217;t be used to transmit any useful messages.&#8217;, I certainly would rule it out.  So, there&#8217;s a handy way to transmit binary data over arbitrary distances.. maybe? That would be nice.</p>
<p>Myke, I think what they are saying is that altering the state of one electron affected the other one, for reasons that can only be explained by their theory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-3038</link>
		<dc:creator>Myke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-3038</guid>
		<description>&quot;the particles did indeed mirror each other’s properties at the exact same moment&quot;

What exactly does this mean?  They both vibrated in the same pattern at the same time?  Are they 100% identical?  If one particle was disturbed, does it affect the other one?  If not, couldnt the particles influence each other when together enough to seemingly still &quot;communicate&quot; when separated?

Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the particles did indeed mirror each other’s properties at the exact same moment&#8221;</p>
<p>What exactly does this mean?  They both vibrated in the same pattern at the same time?  Are they 100% identical?  If one particle was disturbed, does it affect the other one?  If not, couldnt the particles influence each other when together enough to seemingly still &#8220;communicate&#8221; when separated?</p>
<p>Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dietrich Epp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-3005</link>
		<dc:creator>Dietrich Epp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-3005</guid>
		<description>Hate to break it to you, but you can&#039;t make a communication system with this. You cannot make an ansible using quantum entanglement this way.  Anyway, Card&#039;s ansible has a problem: if you can communicate faster than the speed of light, then you can send messages back in time.  Card didn&#039;t predict jack squat, and he either didn&#039;t think very hard about the implications of ansibles or he just doesn&#039;t know very much about relativity.

Let me put it this way: if the particles were really exchanging information, let&#039;s have two spaceships flying by: one from particle A to B, the other from particle B to A. Both spaceships are at the midpoint, C, and travelling quite fast.  One spaceship says, aha! information traveled from A to B, faster than the speed of light!  The other spaceship says, aha! information traveled from B to A, faster than the speed of light!

Not all interpretations of QM have &quot;wave function collapse&quot;... in these other interpretations, things make much more sense and nothing travels faster than light speed. 

Go take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to break it to you, but you can&#8217;t make a communication system with this. You cannot make an ansible using quantum entanglement this way.  Anyway, Card&#8217;s ansible has a problem: if you can communicate faster than the speed of light, then you can send messages back in time.  Card didn&#8217;t predict jack squat, and he either didn&#8217;t think very hard about the implications of ansibles or he just doesn&#8217;t know very much about relativity.</p>
<p>Let me put it this way: if the particles were really exchanging information, let&#8217;s have two spaceships flying by: one from particle A to B, the other from particle B to A. Both spaceships are at the midpoint, C, and travelling quite fast.  One spaceship says, aha! information traveled from A to B, faster than the speed of light!  The other spaceship says, aha! information traveled from B to A, faster than the speed of light!</p>
<p>Not all interpretations of QM have &#8220;wave function collapse&#8221;&#8230; in these other interpretations, things make much more sense and nothing travels faster than light speed. </p>
<p>Go take a look at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Landis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-3002</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Landis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-3002</guid>
		<description>Incredible stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredible stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-2999</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-2999</guid>
		<description>These protons were separated by 11 miles through three dimensions in an arc that approximates the curve of the earth.  We don&#039;t know their exact distance from one another in terms of their x,y,z coordinates but these are not relevant.  

What was discovered here is that the entanglement of these particles took place across another dimension, and that in this extra dimension these particles were separated by 1/10,000 the distance in three &quot;natural&quot; dimensions.  Information traveled, via the entanglement, across this distance in the extra dimension, at or below the speed of light.

The real news here is that we can leverage this extra dimension for communication at the very least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These protons were separated by 11 miles through three dimensions in an arc that approximates the curve of the earth.  We don&#8217;t know their exact distance from one another in terms of their x,y,z coordinates but these are not relevant.  </p>
<p>What was discovered here is that the entanglement of these particles took place across another dimension, and that in this extra dimension these particles were separated by 1/10,000 the distance in three &#8220;natural&#8221; dimensions.  Information traveled, via the entanglement, across this distance in the extra dimension, at or below the speed of light.</p>
<p>The real news here is that we can leverage this extra dimension for communication at the very least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spore</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-2995</link>
		<dc:creator>Spore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-2995</guid>
		<description>Nitpick:

&quot;it would have to travel at 10,000 times the speed of light&quot;

Unless I misread the original article, 10,000 times the speed of light is the MINIMUM speed given the resolution of the equipment that was used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nitpick:</p>
<p>&#8220;it would have to travel at 10,000 times the speed of light&#8221;</p>
<p>Unless I misread the original article, 10,000 times the speed of light is the MINIMUM speed given the resolution of the equipment that was used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan m</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-2983</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/08/13/entangled-particles-seem-to-communicate-instantly%e2%80%94and-befuddle-scientists/#comment-2983</guid>
		<description>qbsmd-

Well done....is there a question in there, or nothing more than a random fact?  OK, I have one too!  

Wikipedia says:

&quot;Bagpipes are a class of musical instrument, aerophones using enclosed reeds fed from a constant reservoir of air in the form of a bag.&quot;

Anyways, in Ender&#039;s Game they claim that the buggers are why we figured out HOW to communicate faster than light.  I guess now that means that we used them (the buggers) to figure out how to carry information using quantum entanglement as opposed to just taking measurments in two swiss cities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>qbsmd-</p>
<p>Well done&#8230;.is there a question in there, or nothing more than a random fact?  OK, I have one too!  </p>
<p>Wikipedia says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Bagpipes are a class of musical instrument, aerophones using enclosed reeds fed from a constant reservoir of air in the form of a bag.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyways, in Ender&#8217;s Game they claim that the buggers are why we figured out HOW to communicate faster than light.  I guess now that means that we used them (the buggers) to figure out how to carry information using quantum entanglement as opposed to just taking measurments in two swiss cities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
