DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
80beats
« Harvesting Infant Hearts for Transplants Raises Ethical Questions
Rat Neurons Build a “Biological Brain” for a Robot »

Russian Invasion of Georgia Imperils U.S. Access to Space Station


International Space StationIn a strange side effect of Russia’s invasion of Georgia this weekend, the U.S. may lose access to Russia’s Soyuz spacecrafts that were expected to ferry NASA astronauts to the International Space Station after the retirement of the space shuttle fleet in 2010. Florida Senator Bill Nelson says that because of Russia’s new aggression, the U.S. Congress may refuse to pass an exemption required to let NASA buy services from Russia.

Under a law known as the Iran Non-Proliferation Act, the United States is banned from buying space technology from Russia unless the president determines Russia is taking steps to prevent the proliferation of nuclear and missile technology to Iran. Congress waived the ban in 2005, allowing NASA to enter into a $719 million contract with the Russians for use of the Soyuz through 2011 [CNN]. But an extension of the waiver needs to be passed to guarantee access to the Space Station after 2011.

With the space shuttle’s replacement not scheduled to fly until 2015, the U.S. will be dependent on Russia to ferry astronauts to the space station for at least five years. Under international agreements that created the station, NASA also needs the Soyuz to meet its obligation to provide enough lifeboats for the station’s American and international crew in case of emergency [Orlando Sentinel]. NASA had hoped to narrow the five-year gap by accelerating the development of the space shuttle’s replacement, the Orion spacecraft, but earlier this week NASA announced that a faster deployment wouldn’t be possible. Another alternative, encouraging private space companies to develop rockets that can ferry cargo and crew, encountered a setback earlier this month when the company SpaceX failed to send a rocket to orbit on its third try.

Senator Nelson says the waiver will face serious opposition in Congress, especially during an election year. “It was a tough sell before, but it was doable simply because we didn’t have a choice. We don’t want to deny ourselves access to the space station, the very place we have built and paid,” Nelson said. “It’s going to be a tougher sell now unless there are critical developments during the next 48 to 72 hours” [Florida Today]. Meanwhile, a senior House Republican staffer said the waiver is “dead on arrival. Nobody thinks it’s going to happen, and the reality is there is no back-up plan for the space station” [Orlando Sentinel].

Image: NASA

Related Posts: New Manned Craft Definitely Won’t Launch Until 2014, NASA Says
Millionaire’s Private Rocket Fails to Reach Orbit on Third Try

Share

August 14th, 2008 10:06 AM Tags: International Space Station, NASA, Orion, private space companies, Soyuz, space flight, space shuttle, SpaceX
by Eliza Strickland in Space | 5 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

5 Responses to “Russian Invasion of Georgia Imperils U.S. Access to Space Station”

  1. 1.   Fred, Wisconsin, USA Says:
    August 14th, 2008 at 5:35 pm

    It’s a sad day for NASA and the world, but it’s time to bite the bullet: let’s cut our losses by backing out of the ISS project now. Set the shuttle on two final missions, the Hubble upgrade and get our last astronaut down from the ISS, and then, cancel the shuttle too. Forget sending up the rest of the ISS…it’s no longer our problem because we didn’t invade Georgia. Then, we can start anew with a fresh manned program if we so desire, with zero dependencies on unreliable foreign partners and with our national pride restored. Yes, we will lose a hundred billion dollars invested, but it will be worse if we continue to rely on the Russians in space…they will pull the rug out eventually anyhow!

  2. 2.   David Says:
    August 15th, 2008 at 9:46 am

    Fred said it so right. one cannot depend on another country for vital goods and services. That’s why other countries around the world should stop being dependent on the U.S. In fact, Asian countries led by China, Japan and India should start developing their own airplanes so they don’t have to buy from Boeing (or even from the European Airbus). They should also have a closed Asian banking system so that they will not be contaminated by the subprime losses of American banks. And they should have their own entertainment empire, too. Just imagine if Disney refuses to let them watch their shows! What will the Asians do? Blank TV screens?

  3. 3.   r rox Says:
    August 16th, 2008 at 3:15 pm

    Some important points…
    “David Says…”
    (1) CHina, Japan .. should start developing their own airplanes…
    They already have. FI-X next generation fighter to replace the F-15J.

    http://bbs.chinadaily.com.cn/viewthread.php?tid=575200

    http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/12/business/jet.php

    http://www.epicos.com/epicos/portal/media-type/html/user/anon/page/default.psml/js_panename/News+Information+Article+View?articleid=73881&showfull=false

    (2) “THey should have a closed Asian Banking system…”
    They already have…

    Stock putrchases, and bank access are limited via nationality constraints. Is a very complicated issue…

    (3) “THey should have their own entertainment empire too…”
    THey already have…

    So many links, this is really enormous issue. Is far larger than anything in the USA. Really.

  4. 4.   dirk alan Says:
    August 21st, 2008 at 5:35 pm

    better still permanent crew. two americans one russkie. 5 year mission. thats a mars mission practice. cargo resupply reboost. where do i sign up

  5. 5.   Super Dad Says:
    August 23rd, 2008 at 12:13 pm

    No, no, no, enough of this bickering. This problem is what it is. The BIGGEST FAULT on our side of the matter is that Congress and NASA didn’t get their you know what together leaving us without a space ship for five (5) whole years. And, then some TRAITOROUS individual somehow injected and manipulated the U.S.A into thinking we could rely on the Russians to “ferry” us to the ISS during our down time. What a bunch of crock!

Leave a Reply





    • 80beats Daily Newsletter

      Enter your email address:

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • RSS Feed

      The RSS feed for 80beats is here RSS.

    • Sci News in 140

      rockahn.net
    • on 80beats

      Recent Comments

      Comments

      • LEE on Who Would Win in a (Legal) Fight: A Whale or a Battleship?
      • LEE on It’s a Small and Wonderful World: Stunning Images of Science Under the Microscope
      • Susan Durham on The Engineer Who Has “Saved More Lives Than Any Single Person in the History of Aviation”
      • Susan Durham on How Spider Silk’s Molecular Make-up Lets It Morph
      • Messier Tidy Upper on Who Would Win in a (Legal) Fight: A Whale or a Battleship?
      • Messier Tidy Upper on Solar Sleuthing Suggests When Odysseus Got Home: April 16, 1178 B.C.
      RSS Recent Posts

      Posts

      • To Escape Chinese Espionage, You Must Travel “Electronically Naked”
      • Why We Can’t Just Get Rid of the Genes That Let Us Get Infected
      • Cancer Drug Today, Alzheimer’s Drug Tomorrow? Hopeful Results in Mouse Study
      • Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      Categories

      Categories

      • Environment
      • Feature
      • Health & Medicine
      • Human Origins
      • Journal Roundup
      • Living World
      • Mind & Brain
      • News Roundup
      • Photo Gallery
      • Physics & Math
      • Space
      • Technology
      • Top Posts
      • Uncategorized
      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
    • About 80beats

      80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles on the day's most compelling topics.

      80beats is written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. This team darts through each day's science news faster than the ruby-throated hummingbird that beats its wings 80 times per second. Send ideas, tips, suggestions, and complaints to [azeeberg at discovermagazine dot com].



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us