DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
80beats
« Mammals Have a Nose for Danger (Literally)
Star Birth on the Edge of a Black Hole »

Two Very Expensive Crashes Trouble NASA


crashed Orion capsuleNews of two spectacular failures involving NASA hardware have giving the space agency a bad publicity week. First, the agency quietly released photos of a crash during a test of the parachute landing system for the Orion crew capsule, the next-generation craft that will replace the Space Shuttle. Then, this morning, NASA announced that a suborbital rocket built by the private contractor Alliant Techsystems (ATK) had to be destroyed during a failed launch. The rocket was carrying two NASA hypersonic experiments.

In the first fiasco, the mock-up of the Orion capsule crashed into the Arizona desert because of one faulty parachute. The good news: All but one of 18 parachutes inflated. The bad news: That 18th one was responsible for orienting the mock-up for a safe landing…. The space agency said it was torn and didn’t inflate properly [Scientific American]. This caused the other parachutes to inflate while the mock-up was going too fast; a NASA video shows that they inflated correctly but immediately tore away from the capsule, sending the mock-up tumbling towards the ground. In a classic understatement, NASA declared that the the result was a landing that “severely damaged the mock-up” [Wired News].

The parachute that failed was not technically part of the Orion capsule—it was only supposed to position the capsule to begin a dry run of its reentry into the atmosphere, which is what NASA was actually trying to test. So properly speaking, the outcome of this test is best summed up not as “failure” but as “no test”. That’s testing jargon for “the test setup messed up so badly that the test told us nothing about the tested system”. Expensive and embarrassing, yes, but it doesn’t indicate a problem with the Orion design [New Scientist].

Today’s news about the failed rocket launch was arguably worse since it involved the destruction of a real mission, but full details haven’t been released by NASA or ATK. What is known is that NASA lost $17 million worth of experiments and effort [The Virginian-Pilot]. It was carrying NASA instruments that were meant to study conditions experienced during hypersonic flight, which is defined as speeds faster than Mach 5, five times the speed of sound. (The supersonic Concorde cruised at a stately Mach 2). Launch officials were forced to destroy the rocket less than 30 seconds after it’s 5:10 a.m. launch. The rocket had veered off-course — NASA officials said they were unsure as to how far — and they had to terminate the flight at about 12,000 feet [Orlando Sentinel].

Image: NASA

Share

August 22nd, 2008 1:33 PM Tags: hypersonic, NASA, Orion
by Eliza Strickland in Space, Technology | 0 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

Leave a Reply





    • 80beats Daily Newsletter

      Enter your email address:

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • RSS Feed

      The RSS feed for 80beats is here RSS.

    • Sci News in 140

      rockahn.net
    • on 80beats

      Recent Comments

      Comments

      • LEE on Who Would Win in a (Legal) Fight: A Whale or a Battleship?
      • LEE on It’s a Small and Wonderful World: Stunning Images of Science Under the Microscope
      • Susan Durham on The Engineer Who Has “Saved More Lives Than Any Single Person in the History of Aviation”
      • Susan Durham on How Spider Silk’s Molecular Make-up Lets It Morph
      • Messier Tidy Upper on Who Would Win in a (Legal) Fight: A Whale or a Battleship?
      • Messier Tidy Upper on Solar Sleuthing Suggests When Odysseus Got Home: April 16, 1178 B.C.
      RSS Recent Posts

      Posts

      • To Escape Chinese Espionage, You Must Travel “Electronically Naked”
      • Why We Can’t Just Get Rid of the Genes That Let Us Get Infected
      • Cancer Drug Today, Alzheimer’s Drug Tomorrow? Hopeful Results in Mouse Study
      • Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      Categories

      Categories

      • Environment
      • Feature
      • Health & Medicine
      • Human Origins
      • Journal Roundup
      • Living World
      • Mind & Brain
      • News Roundup
      • Photo Gallery
      • Physics & Math
      • Space
      • Technology
      • Top Posts
      • Uncategorized
      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
    • About 80beats

      80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles on the day's most compelling topics.

      80beats is written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. This team darts through each day's science news faster than the ruby-throated hummingbird that beats its wings 80 times per second. Send ideas, tips, suggestions, and complaints to [azeeberg at discovermagazine dot com].



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us