Forget the Press Coverage: Conflicting Reports on Rising Oceans Are a Fake Controversy

By Eliza Strickland | September 5, 2008 11:35 am

Greenland ice sheetClimate scientists have long predicted that global warming will melt polar ice sheets and cause sea levels to rise throughout the century, potentially swamping island nations and flooding low-lying coastal cities. But exactly how much ocean waters will rise has yet to be settled. Now, two studies have come out that at first appear to contradict each other, leading to clashing headlines like “An Inconvenient Truth” Exaggerated Sea Level Rise [Telegraph], and Sea Level Rise May Be Twice More Than Expected [Discovery News].

One study seems to downplay the risk of an extreme sea-level rise, while the other hypes it up. But a closer look reveals that the two studies actually bring researchers nearer to scientific consensus.

In the study published in Science [subscription required], researchers examined the hypothesis of a six-foot sea-level rise by 2100, and calculated how quickly the ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica would have to melt into the oceans to produce this effect. Their calculations showed that the glaciers would have to essentially gallop towards the sea, which seems an unlikely outcome. In Greenland, the glaciers moving into the island’s calving fjords would have to increase their speed to 28.4 miles per year and sustain that speed until the end of the century [Telegraph]. These researchers believe the most plausible scenario is a sea-level rise of between two and six feet within this century. As their results have been compared to more radical estimates like the 20-foot rise mentioned in the documentary film An Inconvenient Truth, the findings are being greeted with relief.

Meanwhile, a paper published in Nature Geoscience [subscription required] ultimately came to a similar estimate, but was presented very differently. Researchers looked at what had happened at the end of the last ice age, when the last fragments of the Laurentide ice sheet covered much of north-eastern Canada [New Scientist]. They studied the geological record and used computer simulations to determine how long it took the Laurentide ice sheet to melt away completely and how much it raised sea levels, and determined that the event raised ocean levels about three feet per century.

These researchers say that atmospheric conditions at the end of the last ice age are similar to what the world will experience before 2100, and say the vast Greenland ice sheet could begin to melt more rapidly than expected towards the end of the century, accelerating the rise in sea levels [Guardian]. But while the three-foot rise this model predicts is in line with the other study’s estimate, it has gotten a different reception. Because it was compared to the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change official estimate of a seven-inch to two-foot rise by 2100, this second study has been presented as an alarm bell.

The take-home point is that both research groups say the world is likely to see oceans rise by at least two feet before the end of the century, which would still cause trouble for coastal nations like Bangladesh and the Netherlands, and could bring more damaging floods to U.S. cities like New York and New Orleans. Says Tad Pfeffer, one study’s author: Just because the amount of sea-level rise predicted in the new study is “not a Hollywood cataclysm, it doesn’t mean it’s not important” [National Geographic News].

Image: flickr/Stig Nygaard

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Environment
  • Wil

    Any honest climatologist will admit that nobody on Earth, living or dead, can possibly predict the climate more than a few years in advance. All this fret, panic, debate, and (unfortunately) flat-out shameless lying gets us nowhere.

    Al Gore was famous in the U.S. as a pathalogical liar, on many different topics, for years before he grabbed onto this global warming thing.

  • Juggernaut

    If the Earth is cooling, why would the ice caps melt? If they’re melting now, why are they getting bigger? How do they melt if the temperature stays well below freezing?

  • http://www.xanga.com/BobRichter JediBear

    There’s no ignorance like willful ignorance.

  • Netwatcher

    @Juggernaut

    The ice packs in the arctic haven’t increased they’ve shrunk, but the over all snow fall has increased. Both of these facts have predicted by global warming models for over thirty years.

    Despite being full of ice and snow, the arctic is essentially a desert. As normally there is little moisture in the air, the average yearly snow fall is only 2 inches per year, but as the snow packs have melted, the humidity has risen and along with it increased overall snow fall across the region. Unfortunately not remotely enough to replace the ice and snow that is being lost due to the melt.

    The reason the ice melts in the arctic is because, most of it sits on top of ocean, and while the air temperature rarely rises high enough to melt ice, the water temperature does.

    If you have any more questions feel free to ask, but otherwise feel free to investigate for yourself.

    Your sitting in front of the single most powerful information gathering tool ever invented, and to use it to spread denier talking points rather then actually look for facts seems like a waste of effort.

  • Dan Bekkering

    Quote: Netwatcher

    “Your sitting in front of the single most powerful information gathering tool ever invented, and to use it to spread denier talking points rather then actually look for facts seems like a waste of effort.”

    Right! We now have an eye on the world (of knowledge) unparalleled in Human history.

    Sitting there without doing research is a waste of everybody’s time. Others can do better with their time than the need to answer biased or uneducated questions to prevent the start of “undesirable believes” roaming around.

    The internet connected PC together with Television in particular educational channels like Animal Planet, National Geographic and Discovery Channel give us opportunities for “Quantum Leaping” gains in personal and collective knowledge , unprecedented for in Human existence.

    So go out and venture for yourself, use your knowledge in preservation of Earth, nature and all that lives upon and in it.

    Truth consists solely out of two components:

    1. Ethicality

    and

    2. Responsibility

    Keep that in mind in all of your decisions.

    Kind regards,

    Dan Bekkering.

    http://www.BioEthicUS.org
    http://www.AmnestyForAnimals.org
    http://www.BuyOnIcle.com

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »