So what I got from this article is that the period of inflation right after the Big Bang might possibly have pushed matter further away than the light from it has had time to travel to us here on Earth. So the 13.7 billion light-year limit isn’t really some sort of physical “edge” to reality, but rather just the limit of visibility- Like comparing driving on a foggy road at night to driving the same road on a clear day. The foggy night is the visible universe, and the clear day is all the universe- visible and beyond. So it sounds like the article is saying that we’ve just discovered that the universe is a whole lot bigger than what we are able to see. And the “Dark Flow” is affecting distant parts of the universe that we *can* see from beyond the distance that light has had time to get to us from way out there. Naturally, gravity attracts things that are close more strongly than it attracts things that are distant. So out there on the limits of visibility there is a greater effect on the matter that’s been found to be moving so fast. I guess someone good at math could calculate how much mass has to be out past our visibility limit- if there’s a number for the original rate of expansion, the amount of mass that’s been accelerated, and how far past our visible range the “Dark Flow” producing mass is located, etc. I can’t do that math, but if most of those numbers are known, then the rest ought to be able to be worked out.

OK, that’s what I understood. Now where did I jump the shark? What did I misunderstand?

Thanks for your time.

Perhaps dark flow is caused by all the additional free-floating apostrophes and spelling mistakes in online comments. A grammar singularity?

But should we surender ourselves? Is it infinity ? but what is it ? Are we on continuam ? If yes, then till what will it continue?
When we are unable to find answer we take shelter of Big Creator God/Ishwar / Allah.

The GOD/ Ishwar / Allah all are belief. Human being’s belief. If he can’t answer he surenders to God/ Ishwar/ Allah. Do other animal too think so?
Then what ?

Can the Scientists/ Astrophysists / Philosphers of the univese resolve this? Is it real mysrty or we can’t think off?

For example, the stars radiate throughout the energy of waves with particles of nature! Particles moving mode, which is already in place and at the same time, the region can move particles emanating from the various starfish, and they continue the movement quite the same direction away from the area in which the stars is!

The visible universe outside is truly massive concentration of energy which radiate energy waves, which have the nature of quasars. the same region can become the galaxy from several different angles, so that the business continues to quite the same direction, at the same time, when the first stars emit flammable Light. As a dark flow phenomenon can be explained logically!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AewKGNIZpuE

Step two… as the matter at the edge of the Universe reaches further and further into the increasing vacuum of deep space, the process either repeats itself, or begins to feel the gravitation of another object from outside of our own universe (possibly a quasar from our sister universe; the product of a big bang from our mother universe.) The two objects that have contacted one another through gravitational waves will begin to accelerate more rapidly toward one another, until they finally collide and either explode (big bang type two) or collapse upon one another. The matter that did not expand rapidly enough to escape mother universe either experienced a cold death or fell back upon itself (I lean more towards the cold death because of the implication of a red shift.)

So again, more simplified, close your eyes and imagine (not to scale) a basketball spinning in place and exploding into billions of pieces. Some of those pieces go very far from the center and group into clusters the size of pool balls (approx 100,000 of them) which in turn, also explode into billions of pieces which [repeat] (100,000 x 100,000) hence exponential popcorn universe.

This is not to say that there is no God. I am neither an astrophysicist nor a theologian, these are just my interpretations. God made the heavens and the Earth. He did not tell us the exact workings of either. To deny the possibility that God knows more than we can see only points a glaring finger back at Nicolaus Copernicus and Galileo Galilei, and the way the church reacted to it. If anything, the infinitely complex and unknown aspects of our universe and space beyond, only reinforces the idea of something greater.