Injury to nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, once considered permanent, may be reversible after all. A pair of new studies demonstrate how to override two biological mechanisms that prevent damaged cells of the central nervous system from regrowing. The first obstacle are genes that prevent nerve growth and the second are chemical signals that repress nerve growth.
In the first study, published in Science [subscription required], Harvard researchers identified a gene, PETN, that inhibits the major growth pathway in nerve cells. They created genetically modified “knock-out” mice that lacked the gene. Normally, axons in the optic nerve of adult mice do not regenerate when crushed—and worse yet, about 80% of the neurons with severed axons die. But in mice lacking PTEN, 50% of neurons survived and about 10% of axons in the optic nerve regrew—as far as 4 millimeters in 28 days. “To have any manipulation that can make these axons grow from where they were severed near the retina all the way down the optic nerve is just amazing,” [ScienceNOW Daily News] commented neurobiologist Ben Barres.
However, even with the inhibitory genes shut off, damaged nerve cells still face a chemical environment hostile to regrowth. Marc Tessier-Lavigne of Genentech, lead author of the second study, also in Science [subscription required], explained that when an axon in the spinal cord is severed, the cut end sprouts a growth cone. “It almost looks like a little hand at the end of this cable-like structure,” he said. Tiny sensors on the growth cone pick up chemical signals. In nerves in the periphery of the body such as the finger, signals tell the axon to repair itself. But in the central nervous system, chemical signals repress growth [Reuters]. His team identified one such signal, a protein called PirB, that is found in the myelin sheath that wraps around nerve cells. By blocking the receptor for PirB, they could get nerve cells to regrow in cell cultures.
Scientists believe the body makes regeneration of central nervous system cells especially difficult in order to prevent faulty reconnections. Although the new studies were conducted in mice and cell cultures, similar mechanisms likely operate in humans. In the long run, the optimal strategy for treating spinal injuries may involve a combination of therapies that restore neurons’ ability to grow axons and ones that counteract inhibitory signals near the injury. “You want to do each, and you may need to do both,” says Tessier-Lavigne [Washington Post].
Related Content:
DISCOVER: Can New Neurons Teach An Old Mouse?
DISCOVER: No More Nerve Damage
80beats: Turning Skin Cells into Nerve Cells to Study Lou Gehrig’s Disease
Image: iStockphoto
November 16th, 2008 at 12:43 am
Tremendously exciting, especially for someone from Miami who has been following the progress of The Miami Project. I can still see in my mind the advertisement (not from The Miami Project) showing Christopher Reeves rising from his chair. But the reasons for the problems should not be given short shrift. The roadblocks may be for the reason mentioned in the article or for some other reason. Either way, the fact that they have existed as part of our evolution suggests care. I’m NOT saying all aspects of our evolution are sacrosanct; just that analysis and care are necessary.