DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
80beats
« Cancers Are Rife With Twisted Stem Cells, Casting Doubt on Promising Treatment
Leftover Embryos at Fertility Clinics Pose Troubling Questions for Patients »

Next Mars Rover Won’t Take Off Towards Mars Until 2011


Mars Science LabThe next robotic explorer in NASA’s ambitious Mars program will have to wait an extra two years before taking off towards the red planet, NASA officials announced yesterday. The Mars Science Laboratory was scheduled to lift off in the fall of 2009, but with unsolved issues with some of the spacecraft’s electrical motors … NASA officials no longer thought they could meet that schedule without rushing the testing program.“We’ve determined that trying for ‘09 would require us to assume too much risk, more than I think is appropriate for a flagship mission like Mars Science Laboratory,” Michael D. Griffin, NASA’s administrator, said [The New York Times].

Because Earth and Mars only draw near to each other every 26 months, the next possible launch window will come in 2011. The new delay is just the latest bit of bad news regarding the Science Lab, which has busted deadlines and budgets since the project was approved in 2006. The rover was initially expected to cost $1.6 billion, but the new delay will push costs up to about $2.3 billion, NASA officials said.

At a press conference yesterday, NASA administrators said they chose to delay the project because they didn’t want to skimp on testing the rover in an attempt to stay on schedule. “No one wants a $2 billion hole in the ground instead of a successful mission,” said planetary scientist John Mustard of Brown University in Providence, who heads NASA’s Mars program advisory panel. But “this is going to have ripple effects in the science community,” he added [USA Today]. The extra $400 million that will be needed because of the delay will be drawn from other Mars missions and possibly missions to other planets, and will likely cause some further postponements or cancellations.

The 2,000-pound Science Lab is bigger and heavier than anything that has ever been set down on Mars before, and its operation will be considerably more complex. It will use new technologies to adjust its flight through the Martian atmosphere, and to lower the rover to the surface via a tether from a hovering descent stage. The laboratory will use a new surface propulsion system to drive longer distances over rougher terrain than previous rovers [Orlando Sentinel]. It’s slated to roam near the equator for one Martian year (687 days), and will analyze rock samples in an attempt to learn whether the planet ever supported microbial life.

Related Content:
Bad Astronomy: Followup on MSL: Griffin’s spin
Bad Astronomy: NASA delays next Mars mission by two years
80beats: NASA Vows to Press Ahead With Over-Budget Mars Rover
80beats: Mars Science Lab Has Trouble Lifting Off; Might Make a “Nuclear Crater on Mars”

Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Share

December 5th, 2008 8:37 AM Tags: Mars, Mars rovers, Mars Science Laboratory, NASA, robots
by Eliza Strickland in Space | 4 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

4 Responses to “Next Mars Rover Won’t Take Off Towards Mars Until 2011”

  1. 1.   Larry Says:
    December 5th, 2008 at 10:27 am

    Typical Gov’t we have, spend the money where needed right here in the USA!
    I could name 1000′s of good and needed projects, food banks, cancer research, ….etc..etc

  2. 2.   Larry Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 3:12 pm

    I”M STUPID

  3. 3.   Larian LeQuella Says:
    December 8th, 2008 at 10:01 am

    May also be worth mentioning the “Name the Rover” program: http://marsrovername.jpl.nasa.gov/

    Larry, I totally agree on your assessment of your intelligence in the second post. ;)

    It’s sad that people live in such a small and closed off world where there is no wonder at things outside their own little sphere of perception. I really feel sad for the first poster. They live in such a bleak and frighteningly small world.

  4. 4.   Brian Says:
    August 20th, 2009 at 7:23 pm

    @Larry,

    Why are you here?

    I mean, go frequent web sites devoted to your beloved causes, like “food banks, cancer research, etc”. It seems you aren’t happy here and you’re bringing the rest of us down.

Leave a Reply





    • 80beats Daily Newsletter

      Enter your email address:

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • RSS Feed

      The RSS feed for 80beats is here RSS.

    • Sci News in 140

      rockahn.net
    • on 80beats

      Recent Comments

      Comments

      • Pat Thompson on Watch Ants Sip Grenadine, Spheres of Algae Spin, and Other Small-Scale Spectacles in These Movies
      • amphiox on Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • JD on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Old Geezer on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Bryan Bremner on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Tony Mach on What’s Causing the Bizarre Plague of Tics in Upstate New York?
      RSS Recent Posts

      Posts

      • Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • Video: Coral’s Dramatic Yet Slo-Mo Emergence From the Sea Floor
      • It’s a Shark-Eating Shark–Eating–Shark World
      • Solar Panels Sometimes Pit Global Warming Against Local Ecosystems
      Categories

      Categories

      • Environment
      • Feature
      • Health & Medicine
      • Human Origins
      • Journal Roundup
      • Living World
      • Mind & Brain
      • News Roundup
      • Photo Gallery
      • Physics & Math
      • Space
      • Technology
      • Top Posts
      • Uncategorized
      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
    • About 80beats

      80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles on the day's most compelling topics.

      80beats is written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. This team darts through each day's science news faster than the ruby-throated hummingbird that beats its wings 80 times per second. Send ideas, tips, suggestions, and complaints to [azeeberg at discovermagazine dot com].



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us