<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vatican&#8217;s New Bioethics Rules Grapple With 21st Century Medical Advances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/</link>
	<description>80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day\'s most compelling topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:16:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Freeman Jackson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-16351</link>
		<dc:creator>Freeman Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/#comment-16351</guid>
		<description>I salute the Dignitas Personae but what next? Will the Catholic Church
go so far as to protect/help those who have been victimized by this?
Up until now we have had no voice.

Over 3,000,000 IVFs have been performed but the amount of IVF Fraud
Cases have not being properly recorded and reported. I know because it
happened to me.

Please sign my petition and pass it on.

http://www.petitiononline.com/ivfrape/petition.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I salute the Dignitas Personae but what next? Will the Catholic Church<br />
go so far as to protect/help those who have been victimized by this?<br />
Up until now we have had no voice.</p>
<p>Over 3,000,000 IVFs have been performed but the amount of IVF Fraud<br />
Cases have not being properly recorded and reported. I know because it<br />
happened to me.</p>
<p>Please sign my petition and pass it on.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/ivfrape/petition.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.petitiononline.com/ivfrape/petition.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stella</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-16028</link>
		<dc:creator>Stella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/#comment-16028</guid>
		<description>Please see the link &gt;

http://needing-fathers.blogspot.com 

Assisted reproduction lets down those it was intended for.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please see the link ></p>
<p><a href="http://needing-fathers.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://needing-fathers.blogspot.com</a> </p>
<p>Assisted reproduction lets down those it was intended for.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bystander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-15960</link>
		<dc:creator>Bystander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/#comment-15960</guid>
		<description>I vote that we completely ignore, &#039;Thats so inhumane and against God&quot; people and implement and practice our struggling new technologies anyway.  It&#039;s not like we would force them to use it.  That way everyone wins ^_^.. imo.  I can gain access to incredible life saving/altering medical advances and be happy while they sit back whining about things like &#039;blacks&#039; and &#039;gays&#039; and &#039;educa...edu..edu..cation&#039; and how immoral it all is.

Ps:  Why are all hospitals named after religious figures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote that we completely ignore, &#8216;Thats so inhumane and against God&#8221; people and implement and practice our struggling new technologies anyway.  It&#8217;s not like we would force them to use it.  That way everyone wins ^_^.. imo.  I can gain access to incredible life saving/altering medical advances and be happy while they sit back whining about things like &#8216;blacks&#8217; and &#8216;gays&#8217; and &#8216;educa&#8230;edu..edu..cation&#8217; and how immoral it all is.</p>
<p>Ps:  Why are all hospitals named after religious figures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-15931</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/#comment-15931</guid>
		<description>Good to know that the Holy See is only a moral authority *relative* to the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know that the Holy See is only a moral authority *relative* to the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-15928</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/#comment-15928</guid>
		<description>Mike, the Holy See is only an observer at the UN.  Nonetheless, it has repeatedly used the UN as a forum to condemn any capital punishment that is not strictly necessary (i.e. nearly all) and every kind of torture. The sexual orientation of the victims is beside the point. Torture is torture, and capital punishment is capital punishment.  

You might wish to read this UN document: tinyurl.com/6p7pww
Compare the number of reservations held by the US to the complete lack of reservations in the Holy See&#039;s signing.

More on topic, I find it encouraging that the CDF is considering here both the good and bad uses of these biotechnologies. The conclusion (part 36) of Dignitas Personae seems particularly hopeful when it compares movements like the one for  &quot;the full recognition and protection of disabled or ill people&quot; to fights where great progress has already been made, like worker&#039;s rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, the Holy See is only an observer at the UN.  Nonetheless, it has repeatedly used the UN as a forum to condemn any capital punishment that is not strictly necessary (i.e. nearly all) and every kind of torture. The sexual orientation of the victims is beside the point. Torture is torture, and capital punishment is capital punishment.  </p>
<p>You might wish to read this UN document: tinyurl.com/6p7pww<br />
Compare the number of reservations held by the US to the complete lack of reservations in the Holy See&#8217;s signing.</p>
<p>More on topic, I find it encouraging that the CDF is considering here both the good and bad uses of these biotechnologies. The conclusion (part 36) of Dignitas Personae seems particularly hopeful when it compares movements like the one for  &#8220;the full recognition and protection of disabled or ill people&#8221; to fights where great progress has already been made, like worker&#8217;s rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-15915</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/#comment-15915</guid>
		<description>&quot;it says we must treat all people with dignity regardless of how they were conceived. &quot; but will not condemn states that hang and torture homosexuals, nor support UN declarations of rights in such cases.

No, the Catholic Church is still promulgating the mindset of a primitive desert religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it says we must treat all people with dignity regardless of how they were conceived. &#8221; but will not condemn states that hang and torture homosexuals, nor support UN declarations of rights in such cases.</p>
<p>No, the Catholic Church is still promulgating the mindset of a primitive desert religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-15913</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/#comment-15913</guid>
		<description>Jeffery, the whole point of the document is to say that -all- human beings are equal in human dignity. The Catholic Church does say that rape, extramarital relationships, and IVF are not the right way to conceive children. But at the same time, it says we must treat all people with dignity regardless of how they were conceived. Moreover,  we must treat all people with dignity regardless of whether they are &quot;fully functional&quot;, &quot;healthy enough&quot;, &quot;the right age&quot;, &quot;the right race&quot;, or any other form of discrimination we might think up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffery, the whole point of the document is to say that -all- human beings are equal in human dignity. The Catholic Church does say that rape, extramarital relationships, and IVF are not the right way to conceive children. But at the same time, it says we must treat all people with dignity regardless of how they were conceived. Moreover,  we must treat all people with dignity regardless of whether they are &#8220;fully functional&#8221;, &#8220;healthy enough&#8221;, &#8220;the right age&#8221;, &#8220;the right race&#8221;, or any other form of discrimination we might think up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-15911</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/#comment-15911</guid>
		<description>The Catholic Church is more concerned about clusters of undifferentiated cells than it is about fully grown adults, to wit its policies on condom usage as protection against sexually transmitted diseases, even having its African bishops spreading falsehoods about condoms being precontaminated with HIV by Europeans ( I guess that includes the Vatican) trying to wipe out Africans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Catholic Church is more concerned about clusters of undifferentiated cells than it is about fully grown adults, to wit its policies on condom usage as protection against sexually transmitted diseases, even having its African bishops spreading falsehoods about condoms being precontaminated with HIV by Europeans ( I guess that includes the Vatican) trying to wipe out Africans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffery Lowers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-15883</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffery Lowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/#comment-15883</guid>
		<description>It is illogical to state that &quot;every human life is sacred&quot; and then deny the scientifically derived techniques that have actually created and enhanced human life.  There is a small but growing population of &quot;test tube&quot; babies who are fully functional humans.  The article here denies these people the right to catholic approval, which is wrong and actually impossible by the tenets of the religious practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is illogical to state that &#8220;every human life is sacred&#8221; and then deny the scientifically derived techniques that have actually created and enhanced human life.  There is a small but growing population of &#8220;test tube&#8221; babies who are fully functional humans.  The article here denies these people the right to catholic approval, which is wrong and actually impossible by the tenets of the religious practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catholic physician</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-15881</link>
		<dc:creator>Catholic physician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/#comment-15881</guid>
		<description>I am very, very pleasantly suprised to read such a description of Dignitas Personae on a science blog.  It was neither laudatory nor polemical, and simply states the basic facts accurately.

One question: why not cite from the document directly?  Or from the summary and Q&amp;A provided by the Vatican?  That would seem to be even better reporting rather than using indirect sources, even if they are generally reliable sources.

Last thing: other than some updates to talk about new technologies like &quot;embryo adoption&quot;, none of this is new.  Informed Catholics already knew the Church&#039;s teaching on IVF, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very, very pleasantly suprised to read such a description of Dignitas Personae on a science blog.  It was neither laudatory nor polemical, and simply states the basic facts accurately.</p>
<p>One question: why not cite from the document directly?  Or from the summary and Q&#038;A provided by the Vatican?  That would seem to be even better reporting rather than using indirect sources, even if they are generally reliable sources.</p>
<p>Last thing: other than some updates to talk about new technologies like &#8220;embryo adoption&#8221;, none of this is new.  Informed Catholics already knew the Church&#8217;s teaching on IVF, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larian LeQuella</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-15871</link>
		<dc:creator>Larian LeQuella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/12/15/vaticans-new-bioethics-rules-grapple-with-21st-century-medical-advances/#comment-15871</guid>
		<description>Dark Age beliefs for a Bronze-Age ethos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dark Age beliefs for a Bronze-Age ethos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
