Emperor Left Out in the Cold as Other Penguins Get U.S. Protection

By Nina Bai | December 18, 2008 5:29 pm

penguinSix penguin species will receive “threatened” status and one will receive “endangered” status under the Endangered Species Act, the U.S. federal government announced today. But to the disappointment of wildlife advocates, three other penguin species including the famous emperor penguin (featured in the movie “Happy Feet”) were denied protection under the act. “There are certainly issues with those species, but we did not believe at this time that the populations were reduced or that there were significant threats to lead us to make a determination that they are threatened with extinction,” said Kenneth Stansell, deputy director of the Fish and Wildlife Service [AP], the government agency responsible for the decision.

The “threatened” species include the yellow-eyed penguin, white-flippered penguin, Fiordland crested penguin, Humboldt penguin, erect-crested penguin, and some populations of southern rockhoppers; the “endangered” species is the African penguin. The birds’ habitats range from Antarctica to Peru to South Africa. None of the species are native to American soil, so their new status will have little direct bearing on U.S. policy. But listing the penguins under the act will raise awareness about the species and could give the U.S. leverage in international negotiations to protect them from fishing, habitat loss, development and other threats [AP]. These species will join the polar bear, which was recognized as “threatened” earlier this year, as some of the first species to be officially protected because of threats from global warming.

The decision comes after several years of legal wrangling between the U.S. government and the Center for Biological Diversity, a wildlife advocacy group that had originally sought protection for a dozen penguin species because of the impacts of global warming and other environmental threats [ABC News]. A court order set today as the deadline for the decision. Wildlife groups say the new rules, which still need to be approved by the incoming Obama administration, are not enough. Recent research by penguin expert David Ainley suggests that a two degree rise in global temperatures would cause enough ice melting to wipe out 50 percent of emperor penguin colonies on Antarctica. But the government said there was insufficient evidence to list the emperor as threatened at present, citing uncertainty over climate change predictions [Telegraph].

The Center for Biological Diversity is considering going to court to fight for the slighted emperor penguin. Brendan Cummings of the center said, “This is [a] species that is most ice dependent, that is likely to be most impacted by global warming…Refusing to take action on the emperor penguin equates to business-as-usual climate policy from the Bush administration” [ABC News].

Related Content:
80beats: Patagonian Penguins Wash Up on Brazilian Beaches; Get a Ride Home
DISCOVER: Beacon Bird of Climate Change
Reality Base: Polar Bears Finally Make the Endangered List, Then Get Zero Benefit

Image: flickr / Paul Mannix (African penguins)

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Environment, Living World
  • Corey

    This is so typical the government doesn’t think about the future I mean come on if we don’t plan for global warming in the future we”ll have many more species on the extinct list than there is now. If we take the necessary steps and put the emperor on the threatened list we can save these penguins before there ever in any danger. I hope the new Obama administration will do more for the environment than Bush has. Canada should also start looking at environmental policies and maybe actually get on Kyoto protocol. But of course Harper doesn’t like the Kyoto protocol. Newsflash Harper the way were going, in fifty years your precious majority won’t matter, we”ll all be underwater.

  • Reilith

    it just occurred to me, why do we bother preserving species? isn’t extinction a part of natural selection?

  • Edward

    Yes but it would be a shame to lose our biodiversity. It’s taken millions of years for some of these species to get where they are. Besides we might need one of these endangered species in the future for a particular genetic variation.


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.

See More

Collapse bottom bar