When Little Birds Take Down Jumbo Jets

By Nina Bai | January 16, 2009 2:19 pm

crashA flock of unfortunate Canada geese are thought to have crossed paths with a U.S. Airways Airbus A320 yesterday afternoon, causing the plane to make an emergency splash landing in the Hudson River. All 155 passengers survived with no serious injuries, but the incident is highlighting the problem of birds striking aircraft, which experts say is common but rarely dangerous. Since 2000, at least 486 commercial aircraft have collided with birds, according to the Federal Aviation Administration. Of those incidents, 166 led to emergency landings and 66 resulted in aborted takeoffs [The New York Times].

Just seconds after take-off from LaGuardia airport, the pilot of the U.S. Airways plane reported a “double bird strike” that damaged both engines. Such collisions are most common at low altitudes and the birds most likely to be sucked into aircraft engines are waterfowl, gulls, and raptors. Canada geese, a frequent visitor to golf courses and open spaces in the metropolitan New York area during the winter, pose a particular danger to planes because of their size. The impact of a 12 pound bird hitting a plane traveling at 150 miles per hour is equal to that of a 1,000 pound weight dropped from a height of 10 feet, according to experts on bird strikes [The New York Times]. But smaller birds can pose dangers too. Bird Strike Committee USA even refers to starlings as “feathered bullets,” since they say these birds possess “a body density 27 percent higher than herring gulls” [Discovery News]. Sometimes the impact can cause the engine blades to break off, becoming dangerous pieces of shrapnel that further destroy the engine. 

Airplanes are designed with bird strikes in mind and all commerical aircraft must pass simulated avian collision tests. In the physical tests, the engines are revved to full power inside a test facility and absorb various kinds of birds, from those the size of sparrows to those the size of herons, one at a time. (The birds are already dead.) The engines also ingest multiple birds meant to simulate a collision with a flock, said Matthew Perra, a spokesman for the engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney [The New York Times]. Officials also use a variety of creative techniques to keep birds away from runways, including habitat modification, recordings of predators, releasing actual predators like falcons, and “hazing.” USDA spokesman Larry Hawkins explains that hazing can involve everything from setting up brightly colored scarecrow-type balloons that frighten birds to audible scaring. The latter involves “setting off a device that’s like a 4th of July screamer-type firecracker” whenever flocks of birds are spotted [Discovery News]. In extreme cases, airports may be forced to relocate or exterminate entire flocks.

The incidence of bird strikes may have increased in recent years due to the confluence of two otherwise positive trends: successful conservation efforts and improved technology that allows faster and quieter aircraft. Rory Kay of the Air Line Pilots Association says new aircraft are more difficult for birds to detect and often, birds are sitting quietly until they hear an airplane coming, and then trying to get away, fly up and wind up striking the plane [AP]. However, the hazard of bird strikes have been known almost as long as the history of aviation. One of the earliest human victims was Calbraith Rogers, the first person to fly across the U.S. In 1912, only months after he completed his historic journey, he flew his biplane into a flock of birds and crash landed, dying of a broken neck [BBC News]. 

Related Content:
DISCOVER: It’s a Bird! It’s a Plane! Now It’s Just a Plane

Image: flickr / Ole C Eid

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Environment, Living World, Technology
MORE ABOUT: birds, ecosystems
  • Parker

    I believe that picture is from a Flickr user who is not attributing the photo to its author:
    http://www.alleyinsider.com/2009/1/us-airways-crash-rescue-picture-citizen-jouralism-twitter-at-work

  • Sam Platts

    Is an A320 a “jumbo jet”?

  • http://www.Bonsaikingdom.com Bonsai King

    This has been a problem since the invention of the airplane. Why is this still not solved until now?

    Why not put a strong conical screen in front of the engine? So that birds can not go through and will be deflected. The added resistance on the intake of the engine could be compensated by enlarging the diameter.

  • http://www.amateur-sexchat.info Isopissuell

    Hello !
    you have to check out this wilde weiber

    Best Regards from poland

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »