DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
80beats
« FDA Approves the First Clinical Trials Using Embryonic Stem Cells
The Debate Continues: Another Skull Study Supports the “Hobbit” »

Controversial Deal Could Allow Japan to Hunt More Whales


minke whaleBehind closed doors, members of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) have been discussing a proposal that would give give Japan the right to hunt whales in its coastal waters. IWC officials say the controversial proposal is a compromise measure, as Japan would also have to agree to limit its hunts in the Southern Ocean, but opponents say it amounts to an official sanction of Japan’s whale hunts. The International Fund for Animal Welfare argues that the proposal is part of a dangerous drift towards commercial whaling in the 21st century.”This is Whalergate,” the global director of the fund’s whale program, Patrick Ramage, said [Sydney Morning Herald].

The proposal was put forward by American commission member William Hogarth, a Bush appointee, who has argued that a compromise is necessary to keep Japan from withdrawing from the commission. In recent years, the whaling commission … has been deadlocked between the anti- and pro-whaling camps. Rather than setting a clear direction for conserving and managing whale populations worldwide, its meetings have become contentious donnybrooks in which the two sides have competed for influence while little changed. Worldwide, three countries — Japan, Iceland and Norway — continue to hunt whales, either in the name of research or, in Norway’s case, under a commercial exception established more than 20 years ago [Washington Post].

The draft proposal suggests that Japan be allowed to engage in “coastal whaling” along its shores, although it doesn’t specify how many whales could be killed under such a plan. In return, Japan would have to scale back the annual whale hunt it conducts around Antarctica, in what the Japanese government calls “scientific” whaling. Japan has begun taking more whales in recent years under the science designation, killing 872 in 2007, compared with 540 in 1997 [Washington Post]. The proposal says that the IWC could either come up with a “sustainable” limit on the number of Antarctic minke whales that could be killed each year, or that hunts in the Southern Ocean could gradually be phased out altogether.

The proposal has already generated intense resistance from wildlife conservation groups, who say that increased whaling in Japan’s coastal waters will put additional stress on whale populations near Japan. The International Fund for Animal Welfare also takes issue with the proposal’s statement that the global moratorium on commercial whaling “will remain in effect”. Mr Ramage said: “That seems to rank alongside ‘there is no recession’ and ‘there are [weapons of mass destruction]‘ as an Orwellian approach beyond belief” [Sydney Morning Herald].

Related Content:
80beats: Cacophony in the Ocean May Confuse Whales and Drown Out Their Songs
80beats: Navy 1, Whales 0: Supreme Court Allows Navy’s Sonar Exercises
80beats: Whaling Conference Dodges Thorny Issues; Uneasy Truce Continues

Image: flickr / René Ehrhardt

Share

January 26th, 2009 9:04 AM Tags: environmental policy, ocean, whales, whaling
by Eliza Strickland in Environment, Living World | 14 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

14 Responses to “Controversial Deal Could Allow Japan to Hunt More Whales”

  1. 1.   nick Says:
    January 26th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    It makes me sick to think of people eating these intelligent, (mostly) gentle animals. They have language.

    Of course, the US government is a bag of hypocrisy when it comes to protecting whales – we wont kill them outright, but we sure as heck disrupt their lives violently with our super-powered sonar.

  2. 2.   Bystander Says:
    January 26th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    You know that we actually have to drive species to complete extinction before anyone admits to any wrongdoing. Money money money! And power. Wonder how much use that’ll be on a dead planet? :P

  3. 3.   CSea Perkins Says:
    January 26th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    Thank you for posting and bringing this to my attention. Horrible move. I can’t imagine NRDC allowing this to happen. Are you registered to voice your opinion with them?

  4. 4.   Prem Das Says:
    January 26th, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    The only strategy that will work is hit them in the pocket. Boycott Japanese products especially Japanese cars. There are more than acceptable alternatives available. Teach the Japanese times have changed.
    These message is especially targeted at the Americans. Kill two birds with one stone. Avoid Japanese and buy true blue American. Its the patriotic thing to do right now. Its the kind thing to do.
    President Obama need you in his corner.

  5. 5.   Rahsaan Chisolm Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 8:58 am

    Hayden Pannettiere’s gonna have a cow.

  6. 6.   Corey Says:
    January 28th, 2009 at 12:30 am

    I think this is awful whales are an endangered species and should be treated with respect not hunted to extinction. I think the IWC is a joke if they are even considering this proposal in the first place. These are majestic intelligent creatures that have as much a right to live as we do.
    Bystander is right the japanese will never learn unless we do something.

  7. 7.   Burr Says:
    January 31st, 2009 at 11:38 pm

    The last time that I felt so strongly about was during WWII ——– They appeared somewhat barbaric then —– and still do!

  8. 8.   Jay Warner Says:
    February 1st, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    The precision with which we count whales is pitiful; the actual count is so far below populations of years past — how can we then claim that _any_ whale killing is “sustainable.”

    If a whale were as “cute” as a baby seal, there would be no debate.

    Meanwhile, the best if not only way to “reach” the Japanese government is to not only refuse to buy anything with a Japanese origin, but to send a note to the manufacturer, saying why.

  9. 9.   Robert Law Says:
    July 9th, 2009 at 2:24 am

    I just read a report (“Japanese Whaling Strategies”, The Management Case Study Journal, Vol. 8, Issue 2, 2008, pp 65-82, University of South Australia) which in its summary, stated a growing conern by Japan businesses of a global consumer backlash over the country’s position on whaling. In these hard economic times, they cannot afford any further drop in sales of cars, electronics, or toys.

    The report also stated that 1/5 of the whale meat collected each year is held by the government for the “purposes of promoting the consumption of whale meat”, doing so with annual whale eating events and cooking demonstrations.

    The U.S. gave up Bison long ago. Here’s hoping the younger Japanese generation will break from old traditions and move forward into the 21st century and remove whale meat from their sushi bars.

  10. 10.   Ben Says:
    July 9th, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    Do they not understand what they are doing? They have already been pushed so close to extinction and they want to keep killing them… What are they going to do when they have killed them all? Even considering this proposal is ridiculous. A complete ban on any and all whaling should be ENFORCED (key word) until they populations (if they can) rise to a point where they can possibly be sustained.

  11. 11.   Eddie Barnwwell Says:
    August 4th, 2009 at 8:35 am

    I have been watching “Whale Wars” on ETV and it seems to me, that a nation with the power of the US, could step in and put the squese on Japan’s Whale market. The Tuna market is somewhat controlled, or we think. There needs to be an orginazation of people to work together to get the funds to get film footage while they operate on the offence to create negative profits for the Japanese’ rich. If we wait, it will be too late. The whales will be gone, along with Tuna, Sharks, and other animals here on Earth for our protection. I would be more willing to battle for this type of cause than any war such as Iraq. Been there done that, Viet Nam. I would be more than willing to help. This type of action would be the only way at least slow the killing. There should be more than enough of money from activist that would rather do their part financially, than actively. Just let me know when the ship leaves and I’ll be there.

  12. 12.   Eddie Says:
    August 4th, 2009 at 8:43 am

    I have been watching “Whale Wars” on ETV and it seems to me, that a nation with the power of the US, could step in and put the squese on Japan’s Whale market. The Tuna market is somewhat controlled, or we think. There needs to be an orginazation of people to work together to get the funds to get film footage while they operate on the offence to create negative profits for the Japanese’ rich. If we wait, it will be too late. The whales will be gone, along with Tuna, Sharks, and other animals here on Earth for our protection. I would be more willing to battle for this type of cause than any war such as Iraq. Been there done that, Viet Nam. I would be more than willing to help. This type of action would be the only way at least slow the killing. There should be more than enough of money from activist that would rather do their part financially, than actively. Just let me know when the ship leaves and I’ll be there.

  13. 13.   what? Says:
    January 7th, 2010 at 11:50 am

    None of you bothered to look into Japanese history. America with the three hundred year old culture wouldn’t understand the value of old ways. Japan has hunted whales as a religious practice since the early dynasties and they have the right yo continue as long as they limit their killing. Signed an educated American

  14. 14.   Steve Says:
    January 8th, 2010 at 1:16 pm

    Steve say ‘what?’ to what?

    Steve say what? is talking through his blowhole. Steve say if Japanese history so important why they not still on suicide missions to Pearl Harbour? Steve comes from England which older than Japan but has not same barbarity and amorality. Steve wonder why what? talks in such strange way. Steve say ‘what? thinks okay to kill intelligent animals with exploding harpoon. Steve says ‘what? may be educated but that doesn’t mean he has any understanding of world whatsoever. Steve say how would what? like to be killed by exploding harpoon. Steve say it would not hurt what? as much as it would whale because whale has bigger brain.

Leave a Reply





    • 80beats Daily Newsletter

      Enter your email address:

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • RSS Feed

      The RSS feed for 80beats is here RSS.

    • Sci News in 140

      rockahn.net
    • on 80beats

      Recent Comments

      Comments

      • LEE on Who Would Win in a (Legal) Fight: A Whale or a Battleship?
      • LEE on It’s a Small and Wonderful World: Stunning Images of Science Under the Microscope
      • Susan Durham on The Engineer Who Has “Saved More Lives Than Any Single Person in the History of Aviation”
      • Susan Durham on How Spider Silk’s Molecular Make-up Lets It Morph
      • Messier Tidy Upper on Who Would Win in a (Legal) Fight: A Whale or a Battleship?
      • Messier Tidy Upper on Solar Sleuthing Suggests When Odysseus Got Home: April 16, 1178 B.C.
      RSS Recent Posts

      Posts

      • To Escape Chinese Espionage, You Must Travel “Electronically Naked”
      • Why We Can’t Just Get Rid of the Genes That Let Us Get Infected
      • Cancer Drug Today, Alzheimer’s Drug Tomorrow? Hopeful Results in Mouse Study
      • Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      Categories

      Categories

      • Environment
      • Feature
      • Health & Medicine
      • Human Origins
      • Journal Roundup
      • Living World
      • Mind & Brain
      • News Roundup
      • Photo Gallery
      • Physics & Math
      • Space
      • Technology
      • Top Posts
      • Uncategorized
      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
    • About 80beats

      80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles on the day's most compelling topics.

      80beats is written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. This team darts through each day's science news faster than the ruby-throated hummingbird that beats its wings 80 times per second. Send ideas, tips, suggestions, and complaints to [azeeberg at discovermagazine dot com].



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us