Dumping Iron Into the Ocean Might Not Save the Climate, After All

By Eliza Strickland | January 28, 2009 4:36 pm

ocean fertilizationOne of the most controversial geoengineering schemes that has been proposed to slow the course of global warming, ocean fertilization, received mixed reviews from a new study. The idea involves dumping iron into the ocean to nourish plankton and spur enormous blooms, which would then die off and fall to the sea floor, bringing the carbon dioxide they’d absorbed with them. Now, researchers studying natural plankton blooms near Antarctica have new evidence to fuel the debate over the efficacy of the process, and whether or not it can get our planet out of hot water.

Scientists took measurements around the Crozet Islands, where there are naturally occurring fluxes in iron levels. To the north of the islands levels of iron are boosted each year as iron-rich volcanic rocks are eroded and the nutrients are carried off by the current [Times Online]. Researchers observed a huge plankton bloom there that covered an area the size of Ireland and lasted for more than two months, while also studying the water to the south of the islands, where the prevailing ocean currents don’t carry dissolved iron and therefore plankton blooms don’t form naturally. The results, to be published tomorrow in Nature [subscription required], showed that iron-enriched waters do, as hoped, encourage more carbon to be stored on the ocean floor. But the efficiency of artificial iron fertilisation could be as much as 50 times lower than previous estimates [New Scientist].

Using sediment traps placed on the sea floor, researchers discovered that three times as much carbon falls to the sea floor beneath a bloom as in “clear” waters. Sediment cores taken from the sea floor suggest the carbon stays there for thousands of years [New Scientist]. But as the quantity of trapped carbon was still considerably less than the estimates produced by some geoengineering proponents, researchers say the study raises serious questions about whether ocean fertilization can help mitigate global warming.

Some experts say that artificial schemes could have a more dramatic effect, and that experiments are an obvious next step. Such arguments have immediate relevance because a team of German and Indian scientists aboard a research ship in the Southern Ocean are currently preparing to dump 20 tons of dissolved iron overboard. The experiment generated controversy because some scientists believe the iron’s effects on the marine ecosystem aren’t fully understood. However, marine scientist Andrew Watson says the new study should put critics minds at ease, as it shows that “much larger amounts of iron are being added daily by natural processes around the Crozet Island, and it doesn’t seem to have done the Antarctic ecosystem any harm” [The Guardian].

Related Content:
80beats: Experiment Trying to Create Algae Bloom Goes Ahead Despite Enviro Fears
DISCOVER: 5 Most Radical Ways to Squelch a Climate Crisis (photo gallery)
DISCOVER: Watery Grave profiles the scientists who thought up sequestering carbon in the ocean

Image: R. T. Pollard

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Environment
  • Willa Kammerer

    We interviewed Catherine Brahic, environment reporter at the New Scientist, about geo-engineering yesterday on the public radio show ‘Word of Mouth’.

    http://www.nhpr.org/node/20670

  • http://www.questtopa.com/questiontoyouranswer... Chadhurbhujaya

    Knowledge is power and also a cost saving tool for the future :)

  • http://www.questtopa.com/ Chadhurbhujaya

    Knowledge is power and also a cost saving tool for the future. Read my sig for more info on getting faster more efficient and targetted search results with one simple step.

  • Kelsie

    Well, why not TRY it? I mean it MIGHT work, therefore, if it does, that would help alot, but it wouldn’t really teach us not to pollute, it doesn’t involve “real” work, we will just say “Heck, our oceans are filthy again, put some more iron in them.” Get what I’m saying? Well on the other hand, If it doesn’t work, then we would just not deposit any iron into the ocean anymore. :)

  • Heather

    The issue isn’t just that it ‘might not work’, the issue is that it might cause more harm that good. How much of the ocean life will die because of this synthetic iron ‘fertilizing’ the ocean? Synthetic iron is completely different than the naturally occurring iron eroding from the volcanic rocks! People, WAKE UP! We are ruining this planet! Let nature take it’s course without our ‘help’. Besides, global warming has been *PROVEN* to be a hoax. Educate yourselves!

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »