DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
80beats
« Chicken-Sized Carnivorous Dino Terrorized North American Critters
Scientist Smackdown: Did Mars Phoenix Find Liquid Water? »

Does the Solar System Prefer Left-Handed Molecules?

left-handed amino acidsLeft-handed people may be in the minority, but left-handed amino acids rule the Earth. Researchers have long known that the building blocks of proteins can be constructed in either “left-handed” or “right-handed” versions that are mirror images of each other, but that almost every living organism on Earth uses left-handed amino acids. Now, a new study gives weight to a theory of how that preference came to pass. NASA researchers examined meteorites that predate the Earth’s formation, and say that those early rocks also have a preponderance of left-handed molecules. “Meteorites would have seeded the Earth with some of the prebiotic compounds like amino acids that are needed to get life started, and also biased the origin of life to the left-handed amino acid form,” says [study coauthor] Daniel Glavin [New Scientist].

Researchers note that if you make amino acids from scratch in a lab using their chemical components, you inevitably get half of the right-handed version and half of the left handed version. So it might be expected that if nature makes amino acids in space using similar chemistry, you’d also get a fifty-fifty mixture [CBC]. Yet that’s not what Glavin and his colleagues found when they studied the molecular deposits in six meteorites that are more than 4.5 billion years old. Instead, they found the ratio of amino acids tilted toward left-handedness in all six specimens. In one of the rocks, the imbalance was 18%, the largest ever reported for a meteorite. “I have to admit I didn’t believe it at first,” Glavin says [ScienceNOW Daily News].

The new study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, also suggests various methods by which lefty molecules may have gained the upper hand. Glavin says the process might have started when the amino acids made contact with melting ice inside the meteorites’ parent asteroids–water tends to help left-handed amino acids multiply and dominate. But that’s only part of the answer, he says. Polarized ultraviolet radiation in space might also have helped shift the balance toward southpaw molecules [ScienceNOW Daily News].

Not everyone is convinced by the new findings. Astrobiologist Sandra Pizzarello argues that most meteorites quickly become contaminated when they land here. “Researchers have seen bacteria happily growing inside them,” notes Pizzarello…. She says that if these bugs prefer to eat right-handed amino acids, they could skew the ratio [ScienceNOW Daily News].

Still, if the results bear up under future scrutiny, it suggests that we humans would have something in common with any extraterrestrial life that might exist in our solar system. Studyd coauthor Jason Dworkin says that “if the bias toward left-handed amino acids began in space, it likely extends across the solar system, so any life we may find on Mars, for example, will also be left-handed” [Astrobiology Magazine].

Related Content:
80beats:  Chemicals That Evolve in the Lab May Simulate Earth’s Earliest Life
80beats: Devastating Meteorite Strikes May Have Created Earth’s First Organic Molecules
80beats: New Results from a 1953 Experiment Offer Hints to the Origin of Life
DISCOVER: Life’s Fifth Element Came From Meteors

Image: NASA/Pat Rawlings

Share

March 17th, 2009 10:17 AM Tags: asteroids, meteors, NASA, origin of life
by Eliza Strickland in Living World, Space | 4 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

4 Responses to “Does the Solar System Prefer Left-Handed Molecules?”

  1. 1.   Uncle Al Says:
    March 17th, 2009 at 11:44 am

    There is no credible explanation for biological homochirality: chiral L-protein amino acids and chiral D-sugars. Weak interaction arguments (Mendeleev Commun.< .I> 13(3) 129 (2003), Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41(24) 4618 (2002)) are woefully insufficient (maximum 8×10^(-12) eV PVED versus ambient kT = 0.0257 eV. An obvious source is a chiral vacuum background in the massed sector (not interactive with EM) consistent with teleparallel gravitation, testable on a lab bench.

    Crystallographic space groups P3(1)21 and P3(2)21 are enantiomorphic. All formula units configure into homochiral 3-fold helices (right-handed and left-handed, respectively). There are no conflictng or racemic screw axes. Quartz, berlinite and analogues, tellurium, selenium… single crystals thus furnish atomic-scale left and right “shoes” to test for a vacuum left “foot”. P3(1)21 versus P3(2)21 quartz is particularly good for its commercial production and a control “sock” – amorphous fused silica.

    Load an Eotvos balance with macroscropically and chemically indistinguishable single crystal quartz test masses, space group P3(1)21 opposing P3(2)21. 90 days later the net output is either zero (as with all Equivalence Principle tests since Galileo and Stevin in the late 1500s) or non-zero. Observation trumps dialectic. Somebody should look. A non-zero output is followed by each space group run against fused silica. A quartz enantiomorph homochiral to the vacum background gives a smaller net signal. The two hemiparity experiments’ outputs sum to the full parity experiment’s output as a final validation.

  2. 2.   Nick Says:
    March 17th, 2009 at 11:58 am

    Now, if life on earth is prone to left-handed molecules, why would bacteria grow on downed meteorites that PREFERRED right-handed molecules, since they can’t be found anywhere on earth. They shouldn’t really even know what they are, let alone have a preference for them.

  3. 3.   Gord Baker Says:
    March 17th, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    It is puzzling to me that organisms that can consume only half the contents of a primordial soup would survive and prosper over the possibility of one that can utilize twice as much. But then the building blocks it would create for itself might be just too complicated, and not hang together.
    Thank goodness for such puzzles.

    eogord

  4. 4.   Dr Andrew Misiura Says:
    April 14th, 2011 at 12:28 am

    Dear Sir/Madam, I would like to use your image of homocirality in one of my lectures:
    http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/files/2009/03/left-handed-molecule.jpg

Leave a Reply





    • 80beats Daily Newsletter

      Enter your email address:

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • RSS Feed

      The RSS feed for 80beats is here RSS.

    • Sci News in 140

      rockahn.net
    • on 80beats

      Recent Comments

      Comments

      • amphiox on Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • JD on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Old Geezer on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Bryan Bremner on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Tony Mach on What’s Causing the Bizarre Plague of Tics in Upstate New York?
      • Mike on The Engineer Who Has “Saved More Lives Than Any Single Person in the History of Aviation”
      RSS Recent Posts

      Posts

      • Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • Video: Coral’s Dramatic Yet Slo-Mo Emergence From the Sea Floor
      • It’s a Shark-Eating Shark–Eating–Shark World
      • Solar Panels Sometimes Pit Global Warming Against Local Ecosystems
      Categories

      Categories

      • Environment
      • Feature
      • Health & Medicine
      • Human Origins
      • Journal Roundup
      • Living World
      • Mind & Brain
      • News Roundup
      • Photo Gallery
      • Physics & Math
      • Space
      • Technology
      • Top Posts
      • Uncategorized
      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
    • About 80beats

      80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles on the day's most compelling topics.

      80beats is written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. This team darts through each day's science news faster than the ruby-throated hummingbird that beats its wings 80 times per second. Send ideas, tips, suggestions, and complaints to [azeeberg at discovermagazine dot com].



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us