DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
80beats
« Medical Pot Clubs Get a Reprieve From Raids Under Obama
Bye Bye Birdie? One-Third of American Birds Are in Decline »

Skip the Maggots, Doc: Study Shows They’re Not Better for Wound Cleaning

maggotsStrange as it may sound, maggots have recently been in vogue in medical circles. In increasing numbers, doctors have been placing live maggots on patients’ wounds to clean out decaying tissue; because the maggots eat only dead tissue and leave healthy tissue untouched, they’ve been seen as an efficient way to clean the wound. But now researchers have announced the results of the first large clinical trial comparing maggots to traditional therapies, and found that maggots don’t have a clear advantage.

Maggots did clear away the dead tissue faster, but that’s where their superiority ended. “Maggots, although they sped the cleaning, didn’t speed the healing of the wound,” [lead researcher Nicky] Cullum said in an interview. “Both treatments had a similar cost, but the maggots led to more pain.” The researchers found no evidence that maggot therapy should be recommended for routine use on leg ulcers [Bloomberg].

People with poor circulation in their legs often develop difficult-to-treat leg ulcers. Standard treatments for these ulcers employs various kinds of hydrogels — wet dressings that pull dead tissue from the ulcers. With hydrogels, but not with maggot therapy, a compression dressing can be used to cover the wound and ease patients’ pain [WebMD].

In the study, published in the British Medical Journal, 270 patients with leg ulcers were treated either with larvae of the green blowfly or hydrogel and followed for up to a year. Cullum says the test subjects were game for the experiment: “Surprisingly, people were disappointed when they were allocated to hydrogel” [Bloomberg]. Researchers found that both sets of patients healed at the same rate, but those treated with maggots reported twice as much pain.

The researchers didn’t write off the wriggly therapy entirely. They say that maggots may yet have advantages in some specialized areas, such as preparing patients for skin grafts, where faster wound cleaning means patients can be moved into surgery more swiftly. But establishing this will require further clinical studies [Reuters].

Related Content:
80beats: Calling Forth the Body’s Own Stem Cells Could Speed Tissue Repair
DISCOVER: The Healing Power of Maggots
DISCOVER: Bloodsuckers explores the use of leaches in modern medicine

Image: NIH, showing medical maggots in their packaging

Share

March 20th, 2009 8:55 AM Tags: alternative medicine
by Eliza Strickland in Health & Medicine | 9 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

9 Responses to “Skip the Maggots, Doc: Study Shows They’re Not Better for Wound Cleaning”

  1. 1.   Nick Says:
    March 20th, 2009 at 11:26 am

    Oh thank science. The thought of ever having to have this done gives most sensible people first the heebies, then the jeebies, and maybe some super hejeebelies when you really think about it (and imagine your leg in the trash where you normally find maggots).

  2. 2.   Ken Erickson Says:
    March 20th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    So…maggots don’t defecate? Or that doesn’t matter?

  3. 3.   Frootbat Says:
    March 20th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    But but but!! Can’t we just engineer them to produce a natural anesthetic like leeches? ^_^

  4. 4.   Gwenny Says:
    March 20th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    What a clever idea, Frootbat. LOL I think that if I needed this sort of treatment, I’d be tempted to try the larva.

  5. 5.   Jonathan Wojcik Says:
    March 22nd, 2009 at 6:00 am

    Sensible people, Nick? If people were sensible they would never find natural organisms such as maggots to be upsetting.

    I’d rather have maggots clean a wound than go under a knife. They will clear away every scrap of dead tissue and leave living tissue unharmed. This study doesn’t seem to rule out their use at all; they weren’t supposed to make wounds heal faster, just clean them quickly and effectively, which this study admits they still do.

  6. 6.   gene kissel Says:
    March 23rd, 2009 at 9:04 am

    this is a way the big pill companys make there money. They cant make maggots,they can make cream..Doctors are on big pill companys pay roll…they do what they say.

  7. 7.   Eliza Strickland Says:
    March 23rd, 2009 at 10:57 am

    Gene: I certainly won’t argue with the statement that pharmaceutical companies have too much influence on medical research, but this study has good credentials: It was funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.

  8. 8.   Brian Says:
    August 10th, 2009 at 8:46 pm

    I thought the whole point of the the insect therapies was that the wounds resisted conventional therapy? If these hydrogels are so great, why did people start working with maggots? Are the hydrogels new?

  9. 9.   Poul Andreasen Says:
    August 12th, 2010 at 9:27 am

    @Brian:

    Exactly. Lots of resistant microorganisms coming up like NDM-1.
    We need all the weapons we can get!

Leave a Reply





    • 80beats Daily Newsletter

      Enter your email address:

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • RSS Feed

      The RSS feed for 80beats is here RSS.

    • Sci News in 140

      rockahn.net
    • on 80beats

      Recent Comments

      Comments

      • amphiox on Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • JD on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Old Geezer on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Bryan Bremner on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Tony Mach on What’s Causing the Bizarre Plague of Tics in Upstate New York?
      • Mike on The Engineer Who Has “Saved More Lives Than Any Single Person in the History of Aviation”
      RSS Recent Posts

      Posts

      • Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • Video: Coral’s Dramatic Yet Slo-Mo Emergence From the Sea Floor
      • It’s a Shark-Eating Shark–Eating–Shark World
      • Solar Panels Sometimes Pit Global Warming Against Local Ecosystems
      Categories

      Categories

      • Environment
      • Feature
      • Health & Medicine
      • Human Origins
      • Journal Roundup
      • Living World
      • Mind & Brain
      • News Roundup
      • Photo Gallery
      • Physics & Math
      • Space
      • Technology
      • Top Posts
      • Uncategorized
      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
    • About 80beats

      80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles on the day's most compelling topics.

      80beats is written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. This team darts through each day's science news faster than the ruby-throated hummingbird that beats its wings 80 times per second. Send ideas, tips, suggestions, and complaints to [azeeberg at discovermagazine dot com].



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us