DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
80beats
« Are Reports of a Global Honeybee Crisis Overblown?
Hydrogen Car Goes Down Like the Hindenburg: DoE Kills the Program »

Found: A Part of the Brain That Makes You Want to Move

reachingDeciding to reach out your arm and grab something and physically doing it are very different things, a fascinating new study has shown, and are controlled by two distinct regions of the brain. Researchers found that by directly stimulating a brain region called the parietal cortex, they could give test subjects the strong urge to move various body parts, like arms and lips. An even stronger jolt produced a false belief that they actually had moved. On the flipside of the experiment, when researchers stimulated a different part of the brain, the premotor cortex, the subject jerked or twitched, but wasn’t aware of it. The findings suggest that “we need intention to be aware of what we are doing,” says [study coauthor Angela] Sirigu. The brain’s intention and its prediction of what will result from carrying out that intention create our experience of having moved, she says [ScienceNOW Daily News].

The unusual study took advantage of a common operating room practice. As part of their preparation for surgery, neurosurgeons sometimes electrically stimulate the brains of their patients, who are awake under local anesthetic, to map the brain and minimize surgical complications [ScienceNOW Daily News]. In the case of this new study, published in Science, the patients were undergoing operations for brain tumors, but had agreed to take part in an experiment before the main surgery commenced. In all but one of the seven cases, the cancer was located far from the brain regions being stimulated.

Researchers had previously suspected that the parietal cortex was involved in human volition, but experts note that studying voluntary motion in a neuroscience lab runs into some difficulty. “Volunteers can be asked to choose what action to make, when to make it, or even whether to make it at all,” the neuroscientist Patrick Haggard notes in a commentary accompanying the study. “But these instructions—which amount to ‘Have free will now!’—have something unsatisfactory, even paradoxical, about them,” he notes.

Now, directly stimulating the brain region provided the clearest evidence to date of the parietal cortex’s important role in voluntary action. “Did you move?” a researcher asked a 76-year-old man after lightly zapping a point on his parietal cortex. “No. I had a desire to roll my tongue in my mouth,” he responded. After a stronger pulse to the parietal cortex, a 42-year-old man exclaimed: “My hand, my hand moved” [New Scientist]. Yet the research team detected no signs of movement.

Study coauthor Michel Desmurget says the stronger pulse may have fooled the volunteers because it sent a current through areas that simulate in real time how the movement should unfold if the original intention were actually carried out. Normally such computation would be validated by feedback from the premotor cortex which provides information from the body to determine if the hoped for movement has actually happened. “But in the experiment, the parietal cortex is stimulated in isolation — the brain is not getting any error signal, and is relying on the out-dated parietal simulation” [Nature News], he says.

Related Content:
DISCOVER: The Brain That Misplaced Its Body tells of a stroke patient with a damaged parietal cortex
DISCOVER: Touching the Phantom explores the phenomenon of amputees’ phantom limbs

Image: iStockphoto

Share

May 8th, 2009 6:09 PM Tags: decisions
by Eliza Strickland in Mind & Brain | 8 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

8 Responses to “Found: A Part of the Brain That Makes You Want to Move”

  1. 1.   Nick Says:
    May 8th, 2009 at 6:59 pm

    Sounds more like the study shows that the parietal cortex receives information (i.e. electrical stimulation) as a feedback mechanism to tell your body it has moved somewhere.

    Studies keep showing the brain isn’t as compartmentalized as we think. This is progress, but shocking open parts of the brain to see what happens sounds like hacksaws and hatchets compared to fNMR and DNI technologies that are coming out (it’s possible they used microelectrodes, but the brain is made out of very tiny wiring so even small electrodes may be big in comparison, especially since it sounds like they’re just hitting the surface).

    And, honestly, without a fNMR (known as fMRI to not scare people with the N-bomb, the dreaded ‘nuclear’ word) scan showing how the brain was reacting to the stimulation, how do you know other parts of the brain aren’t also reacting – the parietal cortex is NOT in isolation, it in intimately linked to the rest of the brain, so the shock may have carried and bounced off something else.

    People with lost limbs can still feel those limbs, sometimes. They can itch and hurt, even though they aren’t there. So, shocking part of the brain and making a person feel like they moved even when they didn’t? Not really shocking news. ;)

  2. 2.   Christina Viering Says:
    May 10th, 2009 at 10:09 pm

    Interesting study!

  3. 3.   Dorothy Kurdt Says:
    May 12th, 2009 at 9:45 am

    Sounds like you are trying to simplify a really complex system when you do NOT know what all the parts are. Much the less how each part functions.

  4. 4.   Mike Says:
    May 12th, 2009 at 11:37 am

    The brain is not stimulated with invasive electrodes, nothing goes in. Stimulation is done with something like a little fork with round tips.
    The primary purpose is not research. Patients undergo awake surgeries and electrical stimulations allow to determine what can be removed and what cannot if major deficits want to be avoided.
    the results you can get with fMRI are not as reliable (the areas that react to movement with fmri are not the areas that respond to electrical stimulations). There are recent papers in nature and neuroimage showing that the bold signal (the one that is recorded by fmri) does not reflect neural activity. When you remove the areas that respond to stimulation you get deficits, when you remove areas that did respond to fmri but not stimulation the patient do fine
    You know its specific to the parietal cortex because when you stimulate the areas that are connected with the parietal cortex you don’t get the same response.
    Illusory movements may not be shoking news but contrasted with the unconscious movement triggered after premotor stimulation they are a great step forward!
    Nobody says stimulation activates only the parietal or premotor cortex. It is because it activates the whole circuit that it is relevant

  5. 5.   cranktrain Says:
    May 19th, 2009 at 7:33 pm

    And now, I will hook you up to my joystick and make you fence each other with car antennas, all the while making you think you’re just sitting there imagining it…

  6. 6.   Black Feather Says:
    May 26th, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    lol!

  7. 7.   Black Feather Says:
    May 26th, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    Did I really lol?

  8. 8.   Black Feather Says:
    May 26th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    Seriously, Our brain is truly the final frontier – its so fragile and wonderful in design. Makes me wonder why people do crack, crank or whatever horrible drug to destroy their brains potential. Me, I like using mine. I think….

Leave a Reply





    • 80beats Daily Newsletter

      Enter your email address:

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • RSS Feed

      The RSS feed for 80beats is here RSS.

    • Sci News in 140

      rockahn.net
    • on 80beats

      Recent Comments

      Comments

      • Pat Thompson on Watch Ants Sip Grenadine, Spheres of Algae Spin, and Other Small-Scale Spectacles in These Movies
      • amphiox on Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • JD on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Old Geezer on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Bryan Bremner on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Tony Mach on What’s Causing the Bizarre Plague of Tics in Upstate New York?
      RSS Recent Posts

      Posts

      • Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • Video: Coral’s Dramatic Yet Slo-Mo Emergence From the Sea Floor
      • It’s a Shark-Eating Shark–Eating–Shark World
      • Solar Panels Sometimes Pit Global Warming Against Local Ecosystems
      Categories

      Categories

      • Environment
      • Feature
      • Health & Medicine
      • Human Origins
      • Journal Roundup
      • Living World
      • Mind & Brain
      • News Roundup
      • Photo Gallery
      • Physics & Math
      • Space
      • Technology
      • Top Posts
      • Uncategorized
      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
    • About 80beats

      80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles on the day's most compelling topics.

      80beats is written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. This team darts through each day's science news faster than the ruby-throated hummingbird that beats its wings 80 times per second. Send ideas, tips, suggestions, and complaints to [azeeberg at discovermagazine dot com].



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us