Blue Whales on the Move: Good News or Bad Sign?

By Eliza Strickland | May 13, 2009 8:52 am

blue whaleThe blue whale, the biggest animal that has ever inhabited the planet, seems to be on the move in the Pacific Ocean in ways that could reflect the revival of old migratory patterns disrupted by decades of intensive whaling in the 20th century [The New York Times blog]. Although blue whale hunting was banned in 1965, the whales didn’t return to the northern Pacific waters off the coasts of British Columbia and Alaska, where they were once plentiful.

Whalers formerly caught hundreds of blue whales in the northern zones, landing 1300 between 1908 and 1965. Yet despite the ban, they seemed not to recover there [New Scientist]. Now a new study, published in the journal Marine Mammal Science, reports that 15 blue whales have been sighted in the northern waters over the last decade, and some of them were confirmed to be the same individuals previously spotted farther south, off the shores of California. Researchers can’t yet say what led to the renewed migration: It could be a sign of a booming population, or a response to global warming.

The optimistic scenario is that blue whales have multiplied since the whaling ban, and some are now migrating north because there is not now enough krill to sustain them in California alone [New Scientist]. The more pessimistic scenario suggests that global warming has reduced the stock of cold water krill near California, causing the whales to forage farther afield. Or it could be a combination of those factors, researchers say, admitting to their lack of knowledge. It’s even possible that the whales simply lost the knowledge of the rich northern feeding grounds, and therefore stopped migrating. “It is feasible that whales lost the cultural memory of the Alaska and British Columbia feeding destinations as a result of the intensive whaling there,” says co-researcher, Jay Barlow [New Scientist].

To identify the whales spotted near Alaska and British Columbia, the researchers looked at photographs of the cetaceans taken in the North Pacific Ocean and compared them with a library of blue whale pictures taken along the West Cost of the United States and southern Pacific. The scientists matched the whales by looking at their skin pigmentation patterns and dorsal fin shape [LiveScience]. There are thought to be about 2,000 of the endangered blue whales living off the western coast of North America, and the global population is thought to number between 5,000 and 12,000. That’s down from an estimated population of 200,000 before commercial whaling’s heyday.

Related Content:
80beats: West Coast Killer Whales Are Poisoned by Pollution-Tainted Killer Salmon
80beats: Controversial Deal Could Allow Japan to Hunt More Whales
80beats: Cacophony in the Ocean May Confuse Whales and Drown Out Their Songs
80beats: Navy 1, Whales 0: Supreme Court Allows Navy’s Sonar Exercises
80beats: Mini Helicopters Conduct Whale Check-Ups by Flying Over Blowholes

Image: flickr / Ryan Somma. A model of a blue whale in the American Museum of Natural History. 

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Living World
  • Jumblepudding

    Owing to the longevity of these animals, maybe there are individuals that still remember the old feeding grounds from their youth. Like their distant relatives the elephants, they could have exceptional memories.

  • http://clubneko.net Nick

    These things have brains the size of volkswagons or something crazy – I bet they avoided it because it was dangerous and are now probably exploring out of necessity.

  • http://www.oceana.org Paul

    The jury is still out on the fate of the blue whale. While the ban on commercial whaling has likely aided blue whale population recovery, blue whales are still prone to a myriad of threats and are far from a full recovery. Tantamount to this recovery are abundant and available food resources throughout there entire range, and this is where blue whales might be hard off as they have all their eggs in one basket by foraging exclusively on krill. My organization, Oceana, recently released a report entitled “Hungry Oceans: What Happens When the Prey is Gone?” (available at http://www.oceana.org/prey) that elucidates the vulnerability of blue whales, and many other marine mammals, seabirds, and predatory fish, to shortages in their main food supply due to overfishing, climate change, and aquaculture. Krill, for example, are known to be sensitive to changes in climate. Reductions of prey resources in this way, combined with intense fishing pressure, could be devastating for blue whales and other marine life that depend so greatly on krill. NOAA should finalize the proposed ban on krill fishing along the west coast to safeguard the resources that these animals so critically need.

  • http://www.kenstech.com Ken

    Why does everything that happens have to be “caused by ‘global warming.’” Has anyone thought to go out and actually LOOK to see if this is true? I know sitting in a room theorizing is loads of fun, but science is based on observation. If you want to do REAL science, you have to observe first, THEN tweak your model.

    Ken
    http://www.kenStech.com

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »