<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Can Slow Language Development, Even in the Background</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/</link>
	<description>80beats is DISCOVER&#039;s news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day\&#039;s most compelling topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:31:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/comment-page-1/#comment-64533</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/#comment-64533</guid>
		<description>I think Grant made a very important point, that seems to be ignored a lot. Moral deprivation due to certain things shown on TV. That´s a vital issue. As for documentaries on TV... I do find them educative too. You can also create child-safe internet and read online (Walt Disney has a lot to offer, e.g. www.findingnemo.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Grant made a very important point, that seems to be ignored a lot. Moral deprivation due to certain things shown on TV. That´s a vital issue. As for documentaries on TV&#8230; I do find them educative too. You can also create child-safe internet and read online (Walt Disney has a lot to offer, e.g. <a href="http://www.findingnemo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.findingnemo.com</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/comment-page-1/#comment-31720</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/#comment-31720</guid>
		<description>Hi, my name is Adrian and I am a TV aholic.  Yes, the TV is on all the time when we are home.  I can say that watching educational content is great but even then we are saturated with the show&#039;s content, advertising content, and the visual stimuli.  Basically, brain overload.  With that being said the retention of all the info is soon erased by the next show.  

I would like to try and turn off the TV more often, my children are becoming addicted as well.  My 4 year old has his &#039;shows&#039;, which entails him sitting on the couch like a lump, having all creative and imaginative ideas fed to him.  We have to correct this in our home.

So hopefully, spending more time on non-tv related activities will help all of us use our imagination, communicate amongst each other, and bond with each other instead of the flat screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, my name is Adrian and I am a TV aholic.  Yes, the TV is on all the time when we are home.  I can say that watching educational content is great but even then we are saturated with the show&#8217;s content, advertising content, and the visual stimuli.  Basically, brain overload.  With that being said the retention of all the info is soon erased by the next show.  </p>
<p>I would like to try and turn off the TV more often, my children are becoming addicted as well.  My 4 year old has his &#8217;shows&#8217;, which entails him sitting on the couch like a lump, having all creative and imaginative ideas fed to him.  We have to correct this in our home.</p>
<p>So hopefully, spending more time on non-tv related activities will help all of us use our imagination, communicate amongst each other, and bond with each other instead of the flat screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant H</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/comment-page-1/#comment-31139</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/#comment-31139</guid>
		<description>The television. It&#039;s something I have a few opinions about. I see it as a tool. It can be used for entertainment, like an office computer or gun powder can, but it&#039;s suited for far more.
So what about entertainment... When watching a movie or TV program and the morals depicted don&#039;t quite match with your own sense of acceptable and wrong, do you dismiss it as just entertainment with no bearing on your ideals gained through life? Or do you re-assess the validity your own point of view? Or do you just absorb the life guidance messages (for lack of a better term) without thinking about it?
We are careful when we operate a power tool, we know there are consequences to not being present in mind. I think the TV has dangerous consequences as well when used mindlessly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The television. It&#8217;s something I have a few opinions about. I see it as a tool. It can be used for entertainment, like an office computer or gun powder can, but it&#8217;s suited for far more.<br />
So what about entertainment&#8230; When watching a movie or TV program and the morals depicted don&#8217;t quite match with your own sense of acceptable and wrong, do you dismiss it as just entertainment with no bearing on your ideals gained through life? Or do you re-assess the validity your own point of view? Or do you just absorb the life guidance messages (for lack of a better term) without thinking about it?<br />
We are careful when we operate a power tool, we know there are consequences to not being present in mind. I think the TV has dangerous consequences as well when used mindlessly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwenny</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/comment-page-1/#comment-31046</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/#comment-31046</guid>
		<description>THAT&#039;S why my kids are so smart and have such huge vocabularies . . I never shut up. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THAT&#8217;S why my kids are so smart and have such huge vocabularies . . I never shut up. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/comment-page-1/#comment-31025</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/#comment-31025</guid>
		<description>Sure, it would be interesting to differentiate, but the fact that they didn&#039;t doesn&#039;t invalidate their data, which clearly shows the detrimental affect of watching the TV *in the way that people are watching it.* The data show that the children in the study would be better off, on average, with less TV watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, it would be interesting to differentiate, but the fact that they didn&#8217;t doesn&#8217;t invalidate their data, which clearly shows the detrimental affect of watching the TV *in the way that people are watching it.* The data show that the children in the study would be better off, on average, with less TV watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesca</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/comment-page-1/#comment-31014</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/06/02/tv-can-slow-language-development-even-in-the-background/#comment-31014</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t these studies differentiate between the types of TV content being watched?  How can we equate parents watching Sesame Street or LeapFrog videos or nature/science documentaries with their children, which involves a lot of conversation between child and parent in my experience, with parents who have a game show on while ignoring their kids?  Children pay a lot of attention to content - either live or virtual.  Sit them in front of inappropriate mind-numbing shows and ignore them, and of course you will see language impact.  Watch animated letters jump and sound their ways across the screen?  Educational and a lot more fun than flashcards, and a lot of exercise as the kids (and parents) copy it as well.  But arguments that equate all TV viewing as equal are simply ridiculous.  Books are wonderful, reading is wonderful - but to dismiss additional virtual, gaming and television options out of hand seems to be indicative of an &quot;we didn&#039;t do that when we were kids so it must be bad&quot; kind of attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t these studies differentiate between the types of TV content being watched?  How can we equate parents watching Sesame Street or LeapFrog videos or nature/science documentaries with their children, which involves a lot of conversation between child and parent in my experience, with parents who have a game show on while ignoring their kids?  Children pay a lot of attention to content &#8211; either live or virtual.  Sit them in front of inappropriate mind-numbing shows and ignore them, and of course you will see language impact.  Watch animated letters jump and sound their ways across the screen?  Educational and a lot more fun than flashcards, and a lot of exercise as the kids (and parents) copy it as well.  But arguments that equate all TV viewing as equal are simply ridiculous.  Books are wonderful, reading is wonderful &#8211; but to dismiss additional virtual, gaming and television options out of hand seems to be indicative of an &#8220;we didn&#8217;t do that when we were kids so it must be bad&#8221; kind of attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
