Where did you look, Pig?? o.O

Best intro to subject at Electric-Cosmos. That’s an org.

Subjective coverage with lay explanations (multi-disciplinary): thunderbolts info.

If you want white papers, peer reviews, and math (*shudder*) then check out plasmascience universe.

Just Google any of those and the first result will be the correct link.

You stated “we should ALL consider new ideas and theories”… here’s your chance to prove it. Your notion that current model is leaving PC theory in the dust is a matter of perspective, in my opinion. I think standard cosmology has more kids in the choir, but PC puts *actual* physics to work on the observations, rather than ad hoc explanations to save falsified theories. As a matter of fact- there is a list of predictions to be found at Thunderbolts that might surprise you…

Happy learning :)

That being said, from what I can gather, plasma cosmology generally seems to be lacking in detail compared to mainstream cosmology. It’s also missing most of the key predictions and features of the current model.

So, once again, PROVE IT. We ALL should consider new ideas and theories but it appears the current (accepted) cosmology model being used to solve this problem is leaving your “plasma cosmology” in the dust!

The problem with so-called “black holes” is not only have they never been directly observed or their so-called “event horizon”, but it is not even rigorously quantified. So-called “black holes” are defined as a point-mass singularity with infintie density within an infinitely small volume.

Infinity can’t be quantified by definition.

So, “black holes” don’t sit on a foundation of rigorous quantification as “modern” astronomers would have the general public believe, it’s strictly a product of men’s imaginations with no quantified theoretical foundation.

When electromagnetism is considered you don’t need “dark” matter which has never been detected, or “dark” energy, again never detected.

Astronomy is on the wrong path.

That being said, mharratsc, if you truly ARE the free-thinking genius that you make yourself out to be, then write a paper on your “mass of electro-charged plasma at the center of the galaxy, holding our galaxy together with it’s own magnetic field” theory. I’d love to take a gander, as I’m sure many who are actually in the “field” would.

Also, desipte your thrilling post, I still consider SirWilhelm a tool. “See other competing theories”? No, you didn’t offer any. But I’m open to one that makes as much or more sense than the current one. Maybe the next Einstien is right here, reading this blog. Maybe his name is SirWilhelm or mharratsc. Then again, maybe not.

“YOU’RE A TOOL IF YOU DOUBT THE ESTABLISHMENT!!

Sorry, I can’t help myself when I see really juvenile behavior in a forum like this. Astronomy has left the Sciences and become a religion. “There can be no other models than gravity or YOU’RE A TOOL!” You cannot falsify the Gravitational Model because we have FAITH! Hallelujah! We BELIEVE!! *Church Lady dance*

The only thing seen at the center of the galaxy so far has been enormous amounts of energized plasmas and synchotron radiation, a stellar nursery that shouldn’t exist according to the Gravitational accretion model, a galactic “accretion disk” that seems to be EXcreting, and filaments of plasma in arc and glow modes generating electromagnetic waves- ex. the Double Helix Nebula- Birkland currents entering glow mode in the denser plasma near the galactic center, right on the galactic polar axis.

Any freshman Electrical Engineering student can tell you that any semi-conductive plasma generating an electric and magnetic field is charged, and therefore has a current flowing through it. Electromagnetic attraction is 27 orders of magnitude or so stronger than Gravitational Attraction. You don’t need “the mass of 4 billion suns” or whatever to hold a galaxy together if it’s generating it’s own electromagnetic field.

Elementary Physics.

WOW!

A quick calculation points out that if the previous estimate was 6.4E9 solar masses and now 8.4E9 then that would mean if the previous estimate was calculated on a 10E9 floating points operating dual core laptop the Lonestar 5840 core – mass inducing calculation device produces a whopping 6,42E25 kg per floating point.

One could grow terrified at the prospect of calculating black holes with quantum computers. We might be crushed instantaneously a millisecond or so before [ENTER] says click.