Poison Campaign Kills the Invasive Rats of Rat Island, but Kills Eagles Too

By Eliza Strickland | June 15, 2009 10:18 am

rat islandMore than 220 years since a ship wrecked on the rocks surrounding a remote Aleutian island, biologists believe they may have finally cleaned up the resulting mess. Rats have ruled the island since 1780, when they jumped off a sinking Japanese ship and terrorized all but the largest birds on the island [Reuters]. The voracious rodents feed on bird eggs and even chicks and small adult birds, and they so dominated the tiny island that it was given the name Rat Island. Biologists embarked on an ambitious effort to wipe out the rats last year, and now say they may have accomplished their task–but the campaign may have resulted in some avian casualties.

Nine months after scattering poisoned pellets across the island, biologists say they haven’t spotted any remaining rats, but they have found the carcasses of 186 glaucous-winged gulls and 41 bald eagles. U.S. Fish and Wildlife spokesman Bruce Woods said it’s unlikely carnivorous eagles ate the Rodenticide grain pellets, but they may have devoured some dead rats that had consumed them. “Eagles are scavengers of opportunity,” he said. “Rats don’t make up a big part of their diet naturally, but if meat is available, they’re going to take it” [Anchorage Daily News].

In the $2.5 million campaign to eradicate the invasive species, scientists used cakes of grain laced with a rodent-killing blood thinner called brodifacoum. During [a] trial, 88 percent of rodents perished in their burrows where they would not be exposed to scavengers like eagles or gulls, according to an environmental assessment of the project…. On April 15, 2008, the Rat Island Restoration Project got the formal go-ahead, and in September a helicopter hovered over the 10 square mile island dropping the poisoned grain in a grid pattern [Scientific American], in an attempt to give every rat on the island a lethal dose of the poison.

“So far, no living rats have been observed,” said Woods, who noted that seven observers walked the island looking for signs of survivors. “We’re cautiously optimistic, but it’s a big island. It would be presumptuous to assume that we would have noticed rats if only a few were left.” Before federal biologists consider the island rat-free, they will survey it again next year [Anchorage Daily News]. Even a single breeding pair could eventually repopulate the island, researchers note.

The dead gulls and eagles have been sent to a lab to test for traces of the poison in their bodies, but Woods says that the relatively small number of dead birds won’t make an impact on the bird populations; the Fish and Wildlife agency estimates that 2,500 eagles live in the Aleutians, and says that gull numbers are far higher. The good news is that the survey team reports that Aleutian cackling geese, ptarmigan, peregrine falcons and black oystercatchers are all nesting on the island — and rats appear to be absent. “If the rats are truly gone,” Woods says, “then the long-term benefits to the ecoystem will outweigh the loss of these birds” [Scientific American].

Related Content:
80beats: Finally, a Predator to Control the Notorious Cane Toad: Meat Ants?
80beats: Attempt to Control Invasive Species Backfires Spectacularly on an Antarctic Island
DISCOVER: The Truth About Endangered Species

Image: Art Sowls/USFWS


    Blaeh, that has got to stink!

  • Patimus

    I wonder how many dead rats are in NYC?

  • kate sisco

    Makes me recall the trial by the Aussies to determine how long it would take to kill rats on a deserted island. They equipped it with a tracking device and months later it was still alive and then nothing; they discovered the tracking device and discovered also a rat swimming to the next closest island.
    What are the chances they eliminated the rat population……nil.

  • http://drvitelli.typepad.com Romeo Vitelli

    So are they changing the name to Bird Island, now?

  • Sally

    They are cautiously optimistic, but the island it big… that’s the point, I’m not so optimistic that they have eradicated the rodents.

  • Urqel Finklestein

    The Fish and Wildlife Service killed 41 bald eagles, 186 glaucous-winged gulls and I’m sure a lot of other stuff besides maybe the rats – all on one island, at a cost of millions of dollars to save birds?

    Something definitely stinks about that one. It is simply wrong.

    Someone is lining their pockets.

    Why this particular island? and why not do it without killing birds, if the birds truly need to be saved?

    does no one do real journalism anymore?

  • anders holmberg

    If 41 dead eagles were found, for sure more most have died… All cannot/will not be found. Any study on that?


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.

See More

Collapse bottom bar