DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
80beats
« “Interplanetary Internet” Will Soon Bring Twitter to the ISS
Cyber Attack Hits Government Web Sites; North Korea Is Blamed »

New Observatory Is Now the Coldest Object in All of Space

PlanckThe European Space Agency’s Planck observatory has reached its operating temperature of a mere tenth of a degree above the lowest temperature theoretically possible given the laws of physics, known as absolute zero. That means it’s ready for its mission: Observing the oldest light in the universe, known as the cosmic microwave background, or CMB, to create the clearest picture yet of what the young universe looked like.

Although scientists have achieved temperatures closer than this to absolute zero in the laboratory, the spacecraft is likely the coldest object in space. Such low temperatures are necessary for Planck’s detectors to study the Cosmic Microwave Background by measuring its temperature across the sky. Over the next few weeks, mission operators will fine-tune the spacecraft’s instruments. Planck will begin to survey the sky in mid-August [SPACE.com], and the first batch of data is expected to be released next year. Planck was launched May 14 and will observe the CMB from a spot more than 930,000 miles from Earth.

The frigid temperature in the spacecraft will enable it to take the most sensitive measurements ever recorded of the temperature variations of the cosmic microwave background, which was released only 380,000 years after the Big Bang. Previous space-based missions have found that the temperature of the CMB varies ever so slightly in different areas. Planck is built to resolve these variations in greater detail. Planck’s detectors will look for variations in the temperature of the CMB that are about a million times smaller than one degree – this is comparable to measuring from Earth the heat produced by a rabbit sitting on the Moon. [SPACE.com]. The CMB could tell scientists more about how galaxies, galaxy cluster and the first stars were formed, based on the photons, or particles of light, that the CMB releases.

Lowering Planck to its operational temperature of -459.49 degrees Fahrenheit, or -273.05 Celsius, was no easy task. The remarkable conditions are maintained, in part, by always pointing Planck away from the heat of the Sun. Shields and baffling get the telescope down to about -220C. Three active refrigeration systems then lower the onboard environment at the heart of the observatory extremely close to the state of zero heat energy – when, theoretically, atoms would stop moving [BBC News]. Last week, Planck was maneuvered to its observation point at the second Lagrangian Point of the sun-Earth system, one of five points that, due to gravitational effects, allow the observatory to orbit at a constant speed.

Related Content:
80beats: From Deep Space, Two New Telescopes Will Study the “Cold Universe”
80beats: Scientists May Have Detected the Death Throes of the Universe’s First Stars
80beats: Mysterious “Dark Flow” Is Tugging Galaxies Beyond the Universe’s Horizon

Image: ESA

Share

July 7th, 2009 5:40 PM Tags: Big Bang, cosmology, European Space Agency, light, Planck
by Allison Bond in Physics & Math, Space | 11 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

11 Responses to “New Observatory Is Now the Coldest Object in All of Space”

  1. 1.   Quasar Says:
    July 7th, 2009 at 7:14 pm

    Actually a black hole is the coldest thing in the Universe!

  2. 2.   Dan Says:
    July 7th, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    I’m pretty sure a rabbit sitting on the Moon is not going to be producing any heat.

  3. 3.   Nick Says:
    July 7th, 2009 at 9:16 pm

    Actually, yes, it would be producing heat relative to the surrounding temperatures. Now, the question is, are you talking about the dark side or bright side of the moon. There is a several hundred degree difference between the two in temperatures. Also, you do know that space suits, besides containing atmosphere, are there to remove heat from the astronauts. Keeping them warm isn’t the problem, keeping them from cooking themselves is the problem.

    Considering the dark side of the moon is several hundred degrees below zero (F or C you ask? First one, then t’other), and the rabbit is approximately 36 degrees C, the rabbit would be glowing brightly in infrared compared to the dark surface of the moon, until the mass of the moon leached all the heat out of the dead rabbit’s corpse, and then the bun would remain, never decaying, another remnant of man’s foolish escapades on the moon. :p

    And black holes produce super-heated storms of plasma and charged particles around them due to the tidal forces of their gravity – the same tidal forces that can warm such moons as Europa and Enceladus. What goes on the beyond the event horizon of the black hole, what temperatures are achieved there? Science can’t tell us at the moment. We can’t see it. We can only observe it’s effects. Also, compression will create heat, and black holes do nothing if not compress things.

    Atoms stop moving at 0K… but do electrons stop as well? What about the quanta in the protons and neutrons that make up the nucleus? I guess we’ll find out at some point!

  4. 4.   6Speed Says:
    July 8th, 2009 at 8:50 am

    I think Dan assumed the rabbit wasn’t wearing a space-suit and helmet.

  5. 5.   MDR Says:
    July 8th, 2009 at 8:54 am

    Nick needs to get a life

  6. 6.   Chris Says:
    July 8th, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    you mean a rabbit sitting in a sound stage in Burbank!

    ;P

    OR…

    Rabbit on Moon: I knew I shoulda took that left toin at Albuquerque!

  7. 7.   Jumblepudding Says:
    July 8th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    I’m so cool, I’m cooler than both the Planck observatory and that rabbit on the moon. Dig it.

  8. 8.   Kin Says:
    July 8th, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    Nick, oK is absolute zero. Nothing is moving. It also can’t really happen, so I’m not so sure about your questions. I’m pretty sure it can’t exist or cant be had because if the particle didn’t have any vibrational energy, it would not exist.

    Also. The rabbit dead. Make sense now?
    [6speed may have been subtle]

  9. 9.   Larry C Says:
    July 9th, 2009 at 4:01 am

    but if you could stop atoms from moving, would it spawn another universe.

    oooh look, a rabbit!

  10. 10.   Skeptikor Says:
    July 9th, 2009 at 6:19 pm

    And can you imagine the terrible freezer burn? I hope that rabbit is well bagged.

  11. 11.   My Reference Frame Says:
    July 12th, 2009 at 6:58 pm

    How long can they maintain this temperature on the spacecraft? I’m assuming since it won’t be pointed towards the Sun solar re-charging of power systems is out.

Leave a Reply





    • 80beats Daily Newsletter

      Enter your email address:

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • RSS Feed

      The RSS feed for 80beats is here RSS.

    • Sci News in 140

      rockahn.net
    • on 80beats

      Recent Comments

      Comments

      • Bryan Bremner on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Tony Mach on What’s Causing the Bizarre Plague of Tics in Upstate New York?
      • Mike on The Engineer Who Has “Saved More Lives Than Any Single Person in the History of Aviation”
      • Sarah Zhang on Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • m on The Engineer Who Has “Saved More Lives Than Any Single Person in the History of Aviation”
      • Pandora on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      RSS Recent Posts

      Posts

      • Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • Video: Coral’s Dramatic Yet Slo-Mo Emergence From the Sea Floor
      • It’s a Shark-Eating Shark–Eating–Shark World
      • Solar Panels Sometimes Pit Global Warming Against Local Ecosystems
      Categories

      Categories

      • Environment
      • Feature
      • Health & Medicine
      • Human Origins
      • Journal Roundup
      • Living World
      • Mind & Brain
      • News Roundup
      • Photo Gallery
      • Physics & Math
      • Space
      • Technology
      • Top Posts
      • Uncategorized
      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
    • About 80beats

      80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles on the day's most compelling topics.

      80beats is written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. This team darts through each day's science news faster than the ruby-throated hummingbird that beats its wings 80 times per second. Send ideas, tips, suggestions, and complaints to [azeeberg at discovermagazine dot com].



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us