People with alcohol in their system appear more likely to survive head injuries, according to a new study that has led to speculation that emergency rooms might someday keep a flask on hand to treat brain-injured patients.
Researchers analyzed a national trauma database containing 38,019 cases of moderate to severe head injuries where hospitals also tested the patients for alcohol. For every 100 patients with severe brain injuries who tested negative for alcohol and died, only 88 patients with alcohol in their bloodstream died, a statistically significant 12 percent difference, according to the study, which appears in the Sept. 21 issue of Archives of Surgery [The New York Times]. The boozing patients were also younger and suffered less severe injuries than their sober counterparts. The study is the largest to date examining alcohol’s effect on brain injury survival.
Some doctors even think alcohol might be able to help treat head injuries. It could be that alcohol dampens the body’s inflammatory response to injury, the [research] team told Archives of Surgery. But they stressed that alcohol can cause medical complications and is contributory to many accidents. Experts cautioned people should not interpret the findings as an excuse to drink more alcohol. [BBC News].
Related Content:
80beats: Egyptian “Scorpion King” Made Medicine From Herbs & Booze 5k Years Ago
80beats: Alcohol-Busting Enzyme Also Protects the Heart During Heart Attacks
80beats: Fetal Alcohol Exposure Makes for Booze-Loving Rats
Image: flickr / IntangibleArts
September 22nd, 2009 at 3:49 pm
Last time I drank tequila I needed a shot- of antibiotics.. Had to sit down to pee for two weeks!
September 22nd, 2009 at 9:38 pm
But how many of those head injuries were in there DUE to the alcohol in their systems?
September 22nd, 2009 at 10:32 pm
“The boozing patients were also younger and suffered less severe injuries than their sober counterparts.”
So there was a statistically significant difference in age between the 2 groups as well as severity of injury? Therefore the 12% difference can’t be explained solely by the presence of alcohol?
Or was there a greater difference between the 2 groups and the alcohol explained 12% of it? A subscription is needed to see the study so maybe somebody can clarify this.
September 23rd, 2009 at 11:21 am
@ HiGene: If your last tequila binge coincided with a scientific visit to the home of tequila, then I’d say the water had more to do with it than the agave. Well, the water or the hookers…one of the two.
September 23rd, 2009 at 3:23 pm
I see a lot more drunk nurses on the job if this holds up.