<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Researchers Spot an Ancient Starburst from the Universe&#039;s Dark Ages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/10/28/researchers-spot-an-ancient-starburst-from-the-universes-dark-ages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/10/28/researchers-spot-an-ancient-starburst-from-the-universes-dark-ages/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/10/28/researchers-spot-an-ancient-starburst-from-the-universes-dark-ages/#comment-13133</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=4987#comment-13133</guid>
		<description>If the expansion of the universe is accelerating then why would the light catch us now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the expansion of the universe is accelerating then why would the light catch us now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/10/28/researchers-spot-an-ancient-starburst-from-the-universes-dark-ages/#comment-13132</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=4987#comment-13132</guid>
		<description>Space does not have to expand at the speed of light in order for this phenomenon to exist.  If you have two points, all of the space between these two points still expands.  This can have the effect of increasing the total distance between the two objects at a rate greater than the speed of light.  This is not the case here (the light just ends up extremely red-shifted).

Anyway, your question contains a supposition; that space itself cannot move at the speed of light.  I think that is the ultimate endgame of the universe.  However, when when space does expand at this rate, none of the force carriers from any particle will be able to reach another particle: no gravity, no light, no atoms, just lonely particles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Space does not have to expand at the speed of light in order for this phenomenon to exist.  If you have two points, all of the space between these two points still expands.  This can have the effect of increasing the total distance between the two objects at a rate greater than the speed of light.  This is not the case here (the light just ends up extremely red-shifted).</p>
<p>Anyway, your question contains a supposition; that space itself cannot move at the speed of light.  I think that is the ultimate endgame of the universe.  However, when when space does expand at this rate, none of the force carriers from any particle will be able to reach another particle: no gravity, no light, no atoms, just lonely particles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Lightyear</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/10/28/researchers-spot-an-ancient-starburst-from-the-universes-dark-ages/#comment-13131</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Lightyear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=4987#comment-13131</guid>
		<description>Despite of my name I am not an astro-anything ;)

My noob question is this: If the universe when only 0.7 billion years old (in this case) and were packed much much denser than present, why would it take 13B years for the light from the GRB explosion to reach us? Is/was the rate of inflation magnitude faster than E=MC^2 which is not supposed to be possible, right? Is it because the source of the GRB and the Earth are at the edge of this inflating &quot;balloon&quot;?

OK, wise guys. I can spend a day in Wikipedia reading about the Universe&#039;s Inflation Theory, etc, etc. I just want to ask some really wise people here that are astro-somethings. :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite of my name I am not an astro-anything <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My noob question is this: If the universe when only 0.7 billion years old (in this case) and were packed much much denser than present, why would it take 13B years for the light from the GRB explosion to reach us? Is/was the rate of inflation magnitude faster than E=MC^2 which is not supposed to be possible, right? Is it because the source of the GRB and the Earth are at the edge of this inflating &#8220;balloon&#8221;?</p>
<p>OK, wise guys. I can spend a day in Wikipedia reading about the Universe&#8217;s Inflation Theory, etc, etc. I just want to ask some really wise people here that are astro-somethings. :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yo mama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/10/28/researchers-spot-an-ancient-starburst-from-the-universes-dark-ages/#comment-13130</link>
		<dc:creator>yo mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=4987#comment-13130</guid>
		<description>oh come one...that was so easy and yet you missed it... &quot;talk about a blast from the past...&quot;

sigh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh come one&#8230;that was so easy and yet you missed it&#8230; &#8220;talk about a blast from the past&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>sigh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
