Comments on: The New Murder-Mystery Game: Who Killed Copenhagen?

By: Montvillian

Montvillian — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:18:48 +0000

Great article from Burt Rutan, designer of SpaceShipOne. It’s all about the data:
http://rps3.com/Files/AGW/Rutan.Intro.AGW.b.pdf

By: Bill J

Bill J — Fri, 25 Dec 2009 14:33:01 +0000

Darn, there goes Al Gores’ chance to become an instant billionaire!! He badly needs the money in order to pay his electric bill at his Nashville mansion ($14,000/mo)! Poor Al, he must be afraid of the dark because he keeps a multitude of lights, including lights on every tree on his property, on all day & night. Maybe I’ll shed a tear or two for poor Al, NOT!!!!!! It’s a case of do as I say, not as I do!! Besides, in his mind, he’s too important to worry about or attend to such minor details!! He lost the respect of his fellow Tennesseans long ago. His failure to carry his home state in the 2000 presidential election cost him the election! Some people wanted to erect a statue of him at the state capitol. Alas, it got voted down!! HA! HA! HA!

By: XQZME

XQZME — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:27:18 +0000

This is GOOD! But the Global Governance Cabal, using the AGW hoax as a tool, will still succeed unless the Scientific illiterate press publicizes more widely the recent discoveries that temperatures reported to and by the MET office have been manipulated to make it appear global temperature is increasing.

Widespread, independent actual temperature readings in the following countries show relatively stable temperatures in recent decades as does ocean temperatures.

Australia……………. New Zealand ………….. Antarctica
Siberia……………….Finland………………..…Russia
China…………………European Union…………United States

By: Christina Viering

Christina Viering — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:00:07 +0000

HoHum.

By: Ernie M. Brewer

Ernie M. Brewer — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:38:52 +0000

I think that Copenhagen it self is built to fail. Just as Prof. Bruce de Mesquita, predicted through his equations, check it out here:
http://philosophiareflextions.blogspot.com
Saving the planet and all sentient beings of this Earth would take drastic measures, but not on our part. We have proved that we can alter our behavior for the betterment of civilization, the planet, and our projected future; however, as Climategate demonstarted, our leaders still are plauged by avarice.

By: Thurston

Thurston — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:59:44 +0000

” The U.S. pledged $100 billion to aid poor nations in reducing emissions, and China promised greater transparency in how it cuts carbon, but neither of those are binding”

I sure would like to know the specifics of how this $100 billion will be given. Shouldn’t it be given in the form of clean-energy technology (preferably produced and manufacturered by the U.S.), such as solar/hydro/aero – power? Maybe it would incentivize US companies to get working on improving the technology if they know that billions of dollars of product would be purchased by the US for third world developing countries?

By: Casey Verdant

Casey Verdant — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:48:19 +0000

The Copenhagen Accords are unbinding and unapproved by any meaningful majority of nations from the conference. But the failure of the UN effort shouldn’t stop businesses and corporations from acting on their own.

If you’re interested in global energy standards, check out http://www.greencollareconomy.com. It has hundreds of case studies on emerging green technology and emissions standards. It’s also the largest b2b green directory on the web.