Can anyone confirm me that?

I think it’s probably not true.

Thanks

I think your political analysis of the situation is pretty shallow and your proposed solution right out. The NWO is the reason we don’t have more research; the democratic republic of the USA got us Voyager, Pioneer and many other landmark technological advances, the idiocy of alarmist politics produced the perception of scarcity to coerce obedience and suppress free thought: taxing innovation to death. Think, man!

“America’s abundance was created not by public sacrifices to ‘the common good,’ but by the productive genius of free men who pursued their own personal interests and the making of their own private fortunes. They did not starve the people to pay for America’s industrialization. They gave the people better jobs, higher wages and cheaper goods with every new machine they invented, with every scientific discovery or technological advance—and thus the whole country was moving forward and profiting, not suffering, every step of the way.

The goal of the ”liberals’—as it emerges from the record of the past decades—was to smuggle this country into welfare statism by means of single, concrete, specific measures, enlarging the power of the government a step at a time, never permitting these steps to be summed up into principles, never permitting their direction to be identified or the basic issue to be named. Thus, statism was to come, not by vote or by violence, but by slow rot—by a long process of evasion and epistemological corruption, leading to a fait accompli. The goal of the ‘conservative’ was only to retard that process.” – Ayn Rand

IMO your vision of a rigidly ordered socialist system is idealistic fantasy. The best case in point is the despotic tyranny of Catholicism over Europe for the period euphemistically referred to as the Dark Ages, and the 500 year struggle to extricate scientific inquiry from this ignorant status quo.

I vote with the portion of my earned income that the despots don’t appropriate for their corrupt programs and ‘charities’ that win them free learjet rides. You propose a program of slavcery, demanding I serve them in the hope that they will more efficiently continue the scientific advance? I don’t think so; they only fund weaponizing solutions. Why? To kill us uppity thinking people who might disrupt their monopoly game.

So why would any rocket scientist work to advance the capabilities of their oppressors?

Otherwise the geometry & nature of of the Local Cloud is fascinating.

Because we have global warming to remediate, anti-global-warming kooks to ward off, alqaida to defeat, treacherous double-agents to uncover, two and half wars to fight, hurricanes/earthquakes/tsunamis to rescue, an economy to repair, religions to propagate, new oil and gas wells to discover, cyber warfare to conduct, world hunger to feed, a public to educate why it’s cheaper to deorbit the space station than to maintain it, etc.

It’s lucky that we even had a Voyager.

We need a new world order, where economic health is accumulated not by manufacturing unnecessary things and then encouraging consumers to buy those unnecessaries – but an economy where wealth is accumulated by how much one has contributed to technologies to sustain the future of the human race and our expansion into the Universe.

& another on the greater region.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_Interstellar_Cloud

I think you will find this much more nutritious than apocalypse pop fiction. I wouldn’t expect much getting your science from articles that reference TV as a source… imo disregard the hocus pocus and keep an open mind where facts are sparse.

However if the engineers decided that I need a nuclear power source, I would trust them to do it right far more than the crap the marketing demons are pimping.

Going 14 billion km on one battery is just so much more impressive than paying Tiger Woods to promote your junk (because, its junk!).