DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
80beats
« Why, Oh Why, Did San Francisco’s Famous Sea Lions Disappear?
GPS Tracks Brutus the Wolf on Marathon Hunts Around the Arctic »

Russia Is Developing a Secret Plan to Divert a Non-Threatening Asteroid

apophis_orbitYou may remember back in October that NASA scientists downgraded the threat of the asteroid Apophis slamming into the Earth from remote to even more remote. Thanks to refined computation of the object’s motion, astronomers changed their estimate of the chances for a 2036 collision from an already unlikely 1 in 45,000 chance to a further long shot of 1 in 250,000. Well, that wasn’t enough to ease the head of Russia’s space program, Anatoly Perminov, who today said his nation would plan an ambitious space program to spare the Earth from certain doom, and would eventually ask other world powers to join Russia on this quest.

Without mentioning NASA findings, Perminov said that he heard from a scientist that Apophis is getting closer and may hit the planet. “I don’t remember exactly, but it seems to me it could hit the Earth by 2032,” Perminov said [AP]. Truly, Perminov didn’t remember exactly: Apophis makes a close but harmless pass of our planet in 2029, when it could come within 20,000 miles of Earth, and then swings by again in 2036 (the visit for which NASA downgraded the danger to the remote four-in-a-million).

Despite his chronological uncertainly, Perminov was certain something must be done. “We are talking about people’s lives,” Perminov was quoted by news agencies as telling the radio station. “Better to spend a few hundred million dollars to create a system for preventing a collision than to wait until it happens and hundreds of thousands of people are killed,” he said [AFP].

Apophis, discovered in 2004, is almost 900 feet long. NASA originally estimated the chance of a 2029 impact at 2.7 percent—that being before its scientists had the opportunity to refine their math through further observations. They also expect the minuscule probability of 2068 Apophis collision, already listed at just 1 in 330,000, to diminish as they continue to learn about the object’s trajectory.

Perminov offers no hint as to how Russia plans to deal with Apophis, except to say it would not destroy the asteriod [sic]. “No nuclear explosions (will be carried out), everything (will be done) on the basis of the laws of physics,” he says [USA Today]. Russia is beginning its project in secret, he says, but despite failing to mention NASA’s numbers on the actual threat, he expects space experts from the United States, China, and elsewhere to join in on an international operation to save the planet.

Related Content:
80beats: Will NASA’s Next Step Be an Astronaut Rendezvous with an Asteroid?
80beats: Scientists Pick Up the Pieces (Literally) of an Asteroid Spotted Last October
DISCOVER: What To Do Before the Asteroid Strikes
Bad Astronomy: Apophis Danger Downgraded
Bad Astronomy: We’re All Doomed… Oh Wait, No We’re Not

Image: UH/IA

Share

December 30th, 2009 11:34 AM Tags: asteroids, NASA, Russia
by Andrew Moseman in Space | 26 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

26 Responses to “Russia Is Developing a Secret Plan to Divert a Non-Threatening Asteroid”

  1. 1.   Matthew Weflen Says:
    December 30th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    Yikes. Someone in the international community needs to put a stop to this.

    Knowing the Russians, they’ll screw up monumentally, and set the previously harmless asteroid on a direct course for my house.

  2. 2.   Paul Shin Says:
    December 30th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    And I thought the Cold War was over!

  3. 3.   Mike Borrello Says:
    December 30th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    It’s about time a world power is taking serious steps towards engineering a defense system. My New Year’s wish is that other nations will recognize the importance and join the project. Apophis was just a wake-up call and luck happened to be on our side. Next time we might not be so lucky. Earth’s geological history indicates an impact is inevitable. We need to be watching our skies much more thoroughly, and effective means for mitigating collisions need to be developed, tested and in place well before the critical need arises. With each day we wait we seal mankind’s fate.

  4. 4.   rabidmob Says:
    December 30th, 2009 at 8:53 pm

    I do support the idea of having a plan to avert a collision with dangerous sized objects.

    The Russian announcement seems rather dubious considering other recent Russian political activities.

    I wonder what the best way to dispose of one is.

  5. 5.   bud tillson Says:
    December 31st, 2009 at 10:56 am

    much like global warming if we don’t do something (spend lots of money on science) we are doomed. Russians seem to be going down the right path, develop a world ending event, twist it just enough to catch headlines, and hungry scientist will jump on the band wagon, and begin to prove they might be right. Watch for NASA to reconsider the offer and spend some money….

  6. 6.   Robert Willis Says:
    December 31st, 2009 at 11:15 am

    Wow Matthew, maybe the asteroid should hit your house, at least that would stop you from making any further ignorant, xenophobic, or moronic comments.

  7. 7.   Jimbo Says:
    December 31st, 2009 at 11:46 am

    3 Cheers for Russia’s foresight & humanistic, take charge action.
    We in the US are blaise about this, given so many Armageddon films from hollywood and NASA’s dissing this very real threat: What about orbital perturbations over the next 20 years that could increase that collision probability & make us all blanche white: coulda, woulda, shoulda…. ?
    Developing the technology, in the aftermath of the Halley’s comet rendevous is considerably easier, & should solidify an international program of detecting AND deflecting comets & asteroids that threaten us.
    Lets take action, & invite the ESA & Japan to join with the Russians, forming an international consortium to make this happen.
    Carl Sagan would be smiling !

  8. 8.   Eric Says:
    December 31st, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    Good on RUSSIA! treat this problem like we treat vaccinations! use this event with a small chance of disaster, to prepare for an event with certain disaster.

    @ Mathew and Paul: I thought Discover mag. was aimed towards more educated people. Please enlighten me as to why such a powerful nation houses some of the most ignorant people?

    @ Jimbo: thanks for hitting the nail on the head. I Listen to ALOT of audio books that pertain to possible outcomes of a Russian pre-preemptive attacks, all scary no matter the outcome, but I KNOW full well that they are just stories, and dont let them alter my opinion towards other cultures. Everyone else should do the same and detach themselves from events of the past, media hyperbole and propaganda. Logic should reign supreme.

    cheers from Canada EH!

  9. 9.   Bob Says:
    December 31st, 2009 at 8:07 pm

    Well. There is a chance..and what is the worse we can do..Learn how to redriect one of we ever really do need to.

  10. 10.   Jobas Says:
    January 2nd, 2010 at 10:26 am

    Wow Robert, maybe the asteroid should hit your house, at least that would stop you from making any further ignorant, trolling, or moronic comments.

  11. 11.   Jobas Says:
    January 2nd, 2010 at 12:06 pm

    I think we should just put all our money into AI research and be done with research forever. Think about it.

  12. 12.   Fodderbutwiser Says:
    January 3rd, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    I’m in total agreement with Eric and any others who believe that we need SOME plan to react to these types of threats, and the means to divert them. Right now, we can barely identify what is coming towards the Earth. In the past year, three or more sizeable asteroids approached our planet. They were observed within only hours of closest approach.
    Seems a bit mediocre, huh?
    Oh, and presently we can do nothing about them.

  13. 13.   Adam Says:
    January 3rd, 2010 at 3:34 pm

    I agree we need a better system to address these threats, but this guy should not be in charge. There is no room for “I don’t remember exactly” in aerospace technology.

  14. 14.   alanborky Says:
    January 3rd, 2010 at 10:07 pm

    Yes, well, at this time the Russians may well have only altruistic intentions, but what a perfect excuse for building major weapons capable space platforms in orbit over us, platforms which later, more politically aggressive regimes could put to other uses.

    It may even be the Russians’ apparent openness on this issue is actually intended as an “ah-ah” signal to other nations they’ve caught wind of planning Space-borne militaristic manoeuvres of their own.

  15. 15.   T. Emerson Coleman Says:
    January 4th, 2010 at 2:03 am

    just wondering…what is this thing doing out there? is it an eccentric orbiting satellite of the sun? …the earth? …or just hangin’ around? either way, i’m not too comfortable about mucking around with it.

  16. 16.   Mike Borrello Says:
    January 4th, 2010 at 9:47 am

    For detailed information that developed on Apophis, link to http://www.nasa.gov and search on “apophis”.

  17. 17.   Mike Says:
    January 4th, 2010 at 11:24 am

    For now perhaps we should be more concerned with increasing rainforest destruction, over population and pollution of the air, oceans, land and fresh water instead of spending billions on something that might happen decades from now. Many of the above issues could lead to much human/animal suffering and misery.

  18. 18.   Kevin Says:
    January 4th, 2010 at 2:54 pm

    “everything (will be done) on the basis of the laws of physics,”. It’s OK everyone, they’re going to use physics!

  19. 19.   badnicolez Says:
    January 4th, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    While I think we (all of us inhabiting the planet) need some sort of system to deal with potential future extinction events, this is obviously a great excuse for the Russians to build a space-based weapons system without engendering too much worldwide opposition. The guy in charge over there is former KGB, and for many of those guys the Cold War hasn’t yet ended.

  20. 20.   Brian Too Says:
    January 4th, 2010 at 7:55 pm

    I dunno. The odds seem to be smallish, but the reality is if we hit on the 1/250,000 outcome people will legitimately ask what was done to prevent disaster. Millions could die.

    I’d say the better rationale to pursue this is to build a capability for the future. We’re talking about trying to alter the course of asteroids that weigh potentially millions of tons. We don’t yet know the practicalities of such a need–is the object solid or not? Where is the centre of gravity and how do we interact with it? Is a gravity tractor a realistic option or is it just a theorists fantasy? Do we push or pull?

    I’d hate to have a time come when we need a 100% certain outcome and yet not have any experience whatsoever with moving one of these objects.

  21. 21.   Jonathan Says:
    January 5th, 2010 at 1:07 am

    I look forward to an asteroid hitting the earth, because then there will be shorter lines at the department stores during Christmas rush.

    Well, I might not be in line either, but I guess that’s a price worth paying for shorter lines …

  22. 22.   Iain Ball Says:
    January 5th, 2010 at 7:34 am

    @Jimbo

    No, Carl Sagan would definitely NOT be smiling. In his book “Pale Blue Dot”, he wrong a treatise about the dangers he saw in the proliferation of asteroid deflection technologies. In his view, the risks of such a technology being abused to cause deliberate harm were far greater than the risks of a natural asteroid impact.

  23. 23.   Dave E. Says:
    January 5th, 2010 at 4:15 pm

    I thought we already had a defense, Bruce Willis :]

  24. 24.   Liza Says:
    January 6th, 2010 at 8:55 am

    We don’t know yet the implications of early deflection of an asteriod, such as creating more risk; we don’t know about all the other bodies out there that will be threats. Some other reports say that an asterioid hit would destroy most of the earth-we will all be in the same boat then, gone. Who will know?

  25. 25.   mike Says:
    January 29th, 2010 at 11:55 am

    I know I’m a bit late to the party but…

    This presents a huge opportunity for a lot of good science. Not least of which would be a presence on what is essentially a “free” space vehicle. Imagine what we can gain from a “base” on this rock with imaging, sensor, energy collectors and broadcasting? I wonder if any of the probes that have been built or partially built can be “repurposed” to be planted on Apophis?

    Clearly, a better understanding of the trajectory/orbit of this rock is necessary before a knee-jerk repositioning is done. However, given the possibility of a “solar sail” or similar gentle techniques, this is a project that should be done. Watching Apophis for a few more orbits and collecting data would allow fairly precise repositioning and collection of additional data after!

  26. 26.   Underspot Bay Says:
    February 26th, 2011 at 1:40 pm

    Perminov is silly. LMAO! He’s still living the Cold War between USA (in this case, NASA) and his Russian agency. i’m not american, but poor Perminov! LMAO!

    Che! I wanna laugh at him right now! Can I? :-P

Leave a Reply





    • 80beats Daily Newsletter

      Enter your email address:

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • RSS Feed

      The RSS feed for 80beats is here RSS.

    • Sci News in 140

      rockahn.net
    • on 80beats

      Recent Comments

      Comments

      • Old Geezer on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Bryan Bremner on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Tony Mach on What’s Causing the Bizarre Plague of Tics in Upstate New York?
      • Mike on The Engineer Who Has “Saved More Lives Than Any Single Person in the History of Aviation”
      • Sarah Zhang on Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • m on The Engineer Who Has “Saved More Lives Than Any Single Person in the History of Aviation”
      RSS Recent Posts

      Posts

      • Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • Video: Coral’s Dramatic Yet Slo-Mo Emergence From the Sea Floor
      • It’s a Shark-Eating Shark–Eating–Shark World
      • Solar Panels Sometimes Pit Global Warming Against Local Ecosystems
      Categories

      Categories

      • Environment
      • Feature
      • Health & Medicine
      • Human Origins
      • Journal Roundup
      • Living World
      • Mind & Brain
      • News Roundup
      • Photo Gallery
      • Physics & Math
      • Space
      • Technology
      • Top Posts
      • Uncategorized
      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
    • About 80beats

      80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles on the day's most compelling topics.

      80beats is written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. This team darts through each day's science news faster than the ruby-throated hummingbird that beats its wings 80 times per second. Send ideas, tips, suggestions, and complaints to [azeeberg at discovermagazine dot com].



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us