Is a Scorching, Earth-Like Exoplanet a Withered Up "Hot Jupiter"?

By Andrew Moseman | January 12, 2010 12:02 pm

corot-7bOnce, most of exoplanets that astronomers spotted were giants, but now they’re seeing more and more new planets with masses not far off from the Earth’s. One of those newly found Earth-like exoplanets, however, may not have always been so similar to our own world: An astronomer made the case last week that the small, sweltering planet was once a mighty gas giant that shrank.

Astronomers discovered Corot-7b in September. Its diameter is roughly 1.7 times that of Earth. Based on its size and mass, its density is similar to Earth’s, indicating that it is a rocky Earth-like orb [ABC News]. But the comparisons end there. While it’s rocky like Earth, this fiery hellhole is no place for life. It orbits its star at a distance of only 1.6 million miles (we’re presently at a much more comfortable 93 million miles from our sun) and completes a revolution in only 20 hours’ time. And, NASA’s Brian Jackson argued at last week’s American Astronomical Society meeting, Corot-7b is probably just a shell of its former self, and once was a type of gas giant called a “hot Jupiter.”

Given the planet’s proximity to its star, Jackson says it would be subject to a constant blast of heat that robs it of its mass. Rock vaporized by the extreme temperatures could escape the atmosphere of Corot-7b, and the planet would’ve steadily lost mass as it moved closer to its star. It could be shedding half an Earth mass every billion years. Extrapolating backward in time, Jackson concludes that the planet may have started as a gas-giant world more akin to Jupiter or Saturn, and that its light elements were driven off [Sky & Telescope]. The gas giant case isn’t clinched; one could also argue that the planet was always rock, and just slowly lost mass over the years. Either way “this planet is disappearing before our eyes,” Dr. Jackson said in a statement [ABC News].

Elsewhere at the AAS meeting, astronomers announced a new find: the second-smallest exoplanet ever, given a mouthful of a moniker in HD156668b. The team of astronomers who discovered HD156668b used one of two Keck telescopes at the 4,145-meter (13,600-foot) summit of Mount Mauna Kea in Hawaii. The astronomers used the so-called wobble method, which measures the gravitational effects of a planet on its star [AFP]. This new world is some 80 light-years away in the Hercules constellation. It’s only four times more massive than Earth.

With the exoplanet tally now well past 400, and the planet-hunting Kepler telescope starting to spot its first distant orbs, expect the announcements to keep coming. Maybe soon we’ll even find an Earth-like world that isn’t unbelievably sizzling hot.

Related Content:
80beats: Rock Solid Evidence of a Rocky, Earth-Like Planet
80beats: Study: Strange Planet Has Atmosphere of Gaseous Rock—and It Rains Pebbles
80beats: Kepler Telescope Spies Its First 5 Exoplanets, Including “Styrofoam” World
80beats: Meet the New Neighbors: Earth-Like Worlds Orbiting Nearby Stars
DISCOVER: How Long Until We Find a Second Earth?
DISCOVER: Big Picture: The Inspiring Boom in “Super-Earths”

Image: ESO. Artist’s impression of COROT-7b.

  • amphiox

    I’m missing something with the numbers given here. With a rate of mass loss of 1/2 earth every billion years, it would take some 600 billion years for a jovian-sized gas giant to become the size of Corot-7b. Even a Neptune sized planet would take longer than the age of the universe to get small enough with that rate. Are they postulating that the rate of mass loss was higher in the past?

  • amphiox

    Or is it that by “year” they are actually referring to a single revolution of Corot-7b, rather than an earth year?

  • Andrew Moseman


    Great question, so I asked Brian Jackson. He responds with a clarification: Right now the loss would be about half an Earth mass per billion years (in our years, not Corot-7b’s). But that amount could have been much higher in the past because the star would’ve been brighter and the planet would’ve been bigger, so the planet would’ve received more energy. Thus, he says, large sizes for Corot-7b, even as high as 100 Earth masses, are plausible.


  • Kyle

    Also, right now it is losing rocky mass, but in its earlier days it would have been losing much lighter elements and it could have been shedding those at a much faster pace…

  • G.E.Delerium

    Can’t you guys direct your collective grey matter to something more helpful to mankind, like a vaccine for AID’s or chewing gum that doesn’t lose its flavor after 10 minutes?

  • amphiox

    re #5,

    One of these posts pops up on almost every single space exploration thread. . . . It’s almost like some kind of coordinated effort. I wonder how much collective grey matter they are expending on it?

  • G.E.Delerium

    I don’t know of any coordinated effort. Why would people gang up on space exploration? That would be ridiculous. I just want fruit stripe gum to live up to its name, and to not have a leaky condom lead to AID’s.


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.

See More

Collapse bottom bar