<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASA Jet Studies Haiti&#039;s Fault Lines for Signs of Further Trouble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/01/28/nasa-jet-studies-haitis-fault-lines-for-signs-of-further-trouble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/01/28/nasa-jet-studies-haitis-fault-lines-for-signs-of-further-trouble/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Warner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/01/28/nasa-jet-studies-haitis-fault-lines-for-signs-of-further-trouble/#comment-15750</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=9638#comment-15750</guid>
		<description>&quot;I can’t help it,” dept. 1) The huge ice shelf is not changing its weight against the earth – it was floating to start with, and floating after braking off. A floating boat does not put any force (weight) on the bottom of a lake; neither did or does the iceberg.

2)  An iceberg 24 by 48 miles is huge, as icebergs go.  And it floats, so its relative density is less than 1. The iceberg(s) are well over 1,000 miles from Chile, and much further from Haiti.  The mass of a chunk of earth, say 1,00 yards deep by 24 miles wide by whatever it takes to get to Haiti, is far, far greater than that of the iceberg.  Compared to the earth&#039;s crust, icebergs are tiny.

What might be the _mechanism_ by which a chunk of iceberg, even one hitting an attached ice shelf, could possibly trigger, much less generate, sliding of tectonic plates?  Perhaps some researcher&#039;s could think on this for an afternoon, but I would rather have them mapping the fault lines.

As for expense, perhaps some people would prefer to have no work on earth quakes and fault lines.  Then we could be more surprised when one of them takes down our buildings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can’t help it,” dept. 1) The huge ice shelf is not changing its weight against the earth – it was floating to start with, and floating after braking off. A floating boat does not put any force (weight) on the bottom of a lake; neither did or does the iceberg.</p>
<p>2)  An iceberg 24 by 48 miles is huge, as icebergs go.  And it floats, so its relative density is less than 1. The iceberg(s) are well over 1,000 miles from Chile, and much further from Haiti.  The mass of a chunk of earth, say 1,00 yards deep by 24 miles wide by whatever it takes to get to Haiti, is far, far greater than that of the iceberg.  Compared to the earth&#8217;s crust, icebergs are tiny.</p>
<p>What might be the _mechanism_ by which a chunk of iceberg, even one hitting an attached ice shelf, could possibly trigger, much less generate, sliding of tectonic plates?  Perhaps some researcher&#8217;s could think on this for an afternoon, but I would rather have them mapping the fault lines.</p>
<p>As for expense, perhaps some people would prefer to have no work on earth quakes and fault lines.  Then we could be more surprised when one of them takes down our buildings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Warner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/01/28/nasa-jet-studies-haitis-fault-lines-for-signs-of-further-trouble/#comment-15749</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=9638#comment-15749</guid>
		<description>entry in error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>entry in error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/01/28/nasa-jet-studies-haitis-fault-lines-for-signs-of-further-trouble/#comment-15748</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=9638#comment-15748</guid>
		<description>yea, lets us any event that has anything to do with the earth to generate more money for those global warming fanatics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea, lets us any event that has anything to do with the earth to generate more money for those global warming fanatics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill kreer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/01/28/nasa-jet-studies-haitis-fault-lines-for-signs-of-further-trouble/#comment-15747</link>
		<dc:creator>bill kreer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=9638#comment-15747</guid>
		<description>THERE IS ONE QUESTION THAT ALWAYS ENTER&#039;S MY MIND; WHENEVER I VIEW A NEWS REPORT OF ANY EARTHQUAKES.  SINCE WE ARE SEEING SUCH DRASTIC CHANGES  IN THE EARTH&#039;S CLIMATE DUE TO GLOBAL WARMING; AND MANY ISLANDS THAT USED TO BE THERE ;NOW COVERED BY SEAWATER ; PLUS JUST RECENTLY  BEFORE THE LAST 8.8 EARTHQUALE IN CHILE ; I  READ OF  A HUGE ICEBERG ; THE SIZE OF THE COUNTRY OF LUXENBURG ;CRASHING INTO THE ANTARTIC MAJOR ICESHELF AND BREAKING OFF ANOTHER HUGE ICEBERG THAT MEASSURED 24 MILES WIDW BY 48 MILES LONG . COULD IT BE POSSIBLE THAT SUCH A HUGE CHANGE OF WEIGHT ON THE POLAR CAPS  AND TECTONIC PLATES WOULD CAUSE A SHIFT OF FORCE ON THE FAULT LINE NEXT TO CHILE.  AND WAS THERE   ANOTHER   HUGE CHANGE OF  WEIGTH LOSS OR GAIN     (( SUCH AS THE NEWLY ADDED WEIGHT OF THE WATER  AND LOST WEIGTH OF THE ICE ELSEWHERE )) ON THE EARTH&#039;S TECTONIC PLATE   BEFORE THE HAITIAN DEVESTATING EARTHQUAKE. PLUS ALL THE OTHE EARTHQUAKES AROUND THE WORLD. COULD YOUR RESEARCH GROUP PLEASE EXPLORE THIS; WITH ALL YOUR RECORDS AND VAST SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE AND  TECHNICAL  INFORMATION ON THE TECTONIC PLATES.  SINCE ACTION EQUALS REACTION IT COULD VERY POSSIBLY BE TRUE.        THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME  AND EXPERTISE,          BILL KREER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THERE IS ONE QUESTION THAT ALWAYS ENTER&#8217;S MY MIND; WHENEVER I VIEW A NEWS REPORT OF ANY EARTHQUAKES.  SINCE WE ARE SEEING SUCH DRASTIC CHANGES  IN THE EARTH&#8217;S CLIMATE DUE TO GLOBAL WARMING; AND MANY ISLANDS THAT USED TO BE THERE ;NOW COVERED BY SEAWATER ; PLUS JUST RECENTLY  BEFORE THE LAST 8.8 EARTHQUALE IN CHILE ; I  READ OF  A HUGE ICEBERG ; THE SIZE OF THE COUNTRY OF LUXENBURG ;CRASHING INTO THE ANTARTIC MAJOR ICESHELF AND BREAKING OFF ANOTHER HUGE ICEBERG THAT MEASSURED 24 MILES WIDW BY 48 MILES LONG . COULD IT BE POSSIBLE THAT SUCH A HUGE CHANGE OF WEIGHT ON THE POLAR CAPS  AND TECTONIC PLATES WOULD CAUSE A SHIFT OF FORCE ON THE FAULT LINE NEXT TO CHILE.  AND WAS THERE   ANOTHER   HUGE CHANGE OF  WEIGTH LOSS OR GAIN     (( SUCH AS THE NEWLY ADDED WEIGHT OF THE WATER  AND LOST WEIGTH OF THE ICE ELSEWHERE )) ON THE EARTH&#8217;S TECTONIC PLATE   BEFORE THE HAITIAN DEVESTATING EARTHQUAKE. PLUS ALL THE OTHE EARTHQUAKES AROUND THE WORLD. COULD YOUR RESEARCH GROUP PLEASE EXPLORE THIS; WITH ALL YOUR RECORDS AND VAST SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE AND  TECHNICAL  INFORMATION ON THE TECTONIC PLATES.  SINCE ACTION EQUALS REACTION IT COULD VERY POSSIBLY BE TRUE.        THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME  AND EXPERTISE,          BILL KREER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliza Strickland</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/01/28/nasa-jet-studies-haitis-fault-lines-for-signs-of-further-trouble/#comment-15746</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Strickland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=9638#comment-15746</guid>
		<description>Funny you should mention the Pacific NW, Wendy. I just saw an article in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100128/full/news.2010.38.html?s=news_rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nature News&lt;/a&gt; about new underwater sensors that are being rigged up over the Cascadia fault line. It says the project (funded by federal stimulus money) will &quot;deploy 60 ocean-bottom seismometers off the coasts of Oregon and Washington, at depths of between about 300 metres and 1 kilometre.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you should mention the Pacific NW, Wendy. I just saw an article in <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100128/full/news.2010.38.html?s=news_rss" rel="nofollow">Nature News</a> about new underwater sensors that are being rigged up over the Cascadia fault line. It says the project (funded by federal stimulus money) will &#8220;deploy 60 ocean-bottom seismometers off the coasts of Oregon and Washington, at depths of between about 300 metres and 1 kilometre.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/01/28/nasa-jet-studies-haitis-fault-lines-for-signs-of-further-trouble/#comment-15745</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=9638#comment-15745</guid>
		<description>I sure hope they send the jet to fault lines that are expected to spaz out, and haven&#039;t done so recently. The Pacific Northwest, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope they send the jet to fault lines that are expected to spaz out, and haven&#8217;t done so recently. The Pacific Northwest, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
