DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
80beats
« The Secret to the Sex-less Rotifer’s Success: It’s Blowing in the Wind
Whales vs. Navy: NOAA May Limit Sonar Tests, but Another Case Heads to Court »

Will Genetically Modified Eucalyptus Trees Transform Southern Forests?

eucalyptus-treeNow that many U.S. farmers have grown used to genetically modified (GM) soy and corn, the controversy surrounding GM crops may shift over to GM eucalyptus–a fast-growing Australian tree that, in its unmodified strains, dominates the tropical timber industry.

Two industry giants, International Paper Co. and MeadWestvaco Corp. have formed a biotech venture called ArborGen LLC that is looking to introduce this tree to the southeastern forests of the United States. The company is seeking greater governmental deregulation so it can roll out its plans of replacing native pines in southeastern plantation forests with the genetically engineered eucalyptus, which can survive freezing winter temperatures.

Unlike the pine trees used in Southern plantations — which have quietly helped displace tobacco in the region’s economy — eucalyptus can deploy a full canopy of leaves within a few years. It is greedy for carbon, and within 27 months can grow to 55 feet in height [The New York Times].  ArborGen points out that the high growth rate will allow the company to grow more wood on less land, which could provide a boost to the region’s timber exports. What’s more, the wood could potentially serve as a biofuel feedstock.

Critics, however, worry that the plant would grow untrammeled, like a weed gone wild, and would consume whole forests and wipe out native foliage. One of the two species used to breed ArborGen’s hybrids, Eucalyptus grandis, had previously turned invasive in South Africa–raising concerns about this tree turning invasive in the south. ArborGen has received conditional approval from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to expand its experimental eucalyptus operations to 28 sites in seven states, for a total of 330 acres of forest. Given the uncertainty involved, however, the Nature Conservancy has recommended to USDA that ArborGen be allowed fewer acres and trees to flower, and none in Florida, [ecologist Doria Gordon] said. The draft permit approved by USDA would allow flowering in 10 sites across the state [The New York Times]. ArborGen has pointed out that the tree that grew invasive in South Africa was thriving in arid conditions, something that would not happen in Florida due its moist climate.

ArborGen also says that the GM trees won’t spread because of a genetic tweak that prevents the trees from reproducing. (Similar techniques have been used to make GM plants like corn and soy infertile, a controversial tactic that forces farmers to buy new seeds each year.) In the case of the eucalyptus trees, ArborGen restricts their pollen production with a bacterial gene that produces a toxic enzyme called barnase that slices apart genetic material in a cell, causing death. Through genetic trickery, the enzyme is only produced in the pollen-spreading parts of the tree, destroying its ability to reproduce — at least most of the time [The New York Times].

It’s not yet clear how the public will feel about GM forests. But scientists note that some trees that have been genetically tweaked to prevent disease have already gained widespread acceptance–like papaya trees in Hawaii that are less susceptible to the ringspot virus, and American chestnuts that resist a deadly fungus. ArborGen’s scientists argue that tweaking eucalyptus trees for commercial reasons isn’t so different from those earlier efforts, and say the trees could eventually play a significant role in biofuel production. Tree geneticist Steve Strauss, who consulted with ArborGen, says: “If we’re going to rely on biofuels as a significant part of a diverse portfolio of renewable technology,” then harvesting trees is the best way to go, he said. “There’s a lot of marginal land that could be used” [The New York Times].

Related Content:
80beats: GM Corn & Organ Failure: Lots of Sensationalism, Few Facts
80beats: GM Corn Leads to Organ Failure!? Not So Fast
80beats: New Biotech Corn Gives Triple Vitamin Boost; Professors Unmoved
80beats: Germany Joins the European Mutiny of Genetically Modified Crops
DISCOVER: “Frankenfoods” That Could Feed the World
DISCOVER: Genetically Altered Corn, and how GM corn not intended for humans got into the food supply

Image: iStockphoto

Share

February 1st, 2010 4:25 PM Tags: biofuels, biotechnology, botany, Genetic Engineering, trees
by Smriti Rao in Environment, Living World, Technology | 14 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

14 Responses to “Will Genetically Modified Eucalyptus Trees Transform Southern Forests?”

  1. 1.   Flávio Says:
    February 1st, 2010 at 5:06 pm

    Fight it, this tree is destroying the ecosystem in my country (Portugal), most of our “forests”, are now eucalyptus, the native trees are declining rapidly.

    It should be banned altogether from non endogenous land.

  2. 2.   nick Says:
    February 1st, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    Doesn’t matter. Like it or not we’re changing the face of the full earth, one acre at a time. Our population is growing in such a way that we’ll eventually have to manage every inch of land available.

    What we should be doing is enforcing environmental protection regulations on these companies to genetically modify the native forests to fight off eucalyptus invasions.

    The leaves harvested from these trees will be a good source for biofuels.

    You can cut these things down to stumps and they’ll fully regrow. Maybe even faster because they already have their full root network in place. Amazingly industrious plant.

    Corn grows wild, right? It’s not indigenous, it was crafted via years of genetic tampering. We’ve just exponentially accelerated the process. That is technology.

  3. 3.   Mike Says:
    February 1st, 2010 at 5:39 pm

    Would these increase the fire danger in the southeast (compared to what’s there now) if they were accepted and cropped up all over?

  4. 4.   Flávio Says:
    February 1st, 2010 at 6:15 pm

    The fire danger would incise (eucalyptus leafs have some kind of oil), and don’t compare to corn, theses things grown wild and spread like crazy, and governments aren’t going send team to cut them on hills and highlands.

    It’s your country, still forest protection was one of the things US did better that southern European countries, lets see what the future holds,

    And about modifying existing trees, there is no gain (money wise) in doing that, so I wouldn’t expected.

  5. 5.   Martin Says:
    February 1st, 2010 at 8:50 pm

    Hopefully this will make caring for my Koalas a lot cheaper. I am spending $5000 per/mo to import eucalyptus from Australia. You might not think it, but Koala meat is one of the tastiest in nature.

  6. 6.   krissy Says:
    February 1st, 2010 at 9:33 pm

    bad idea.

  7. 7.   farranger Says:
    February 1st, 2010 at 10:24 pm

    These tree/weeds are already an invasive species along the coast of California, displacing native plants because some clever fool imported them years ago to use for growing wood for fence posts and telephone poles.
    The article says these trees could provide a boost to timber sales. No way. Problem is, the wood they produce is crap – not even good enough for fence posts.
    What they are wanted for is to fuel wood fired power plants in the South because they don’t have a significant coal industry. A German utility firm has plans to build one of the largest wood pellet fired power plants in the world in the American southeast. And like the article says, the tree is greedy for carbon – which will all be released as CO2 immediately upon burning, just like coal.
    Of course I’m sure all levels of the government would be willing to give them a gift from the citizens in the form of tax breaks or other financial incentives to sequester this unfortunate byproduct of modern power production – on top of whatever incentives they will get to build the plant in the first place.

    Ain’t progress wonderful?

  8. 8.   kathi w Says:
    February 2nd, 2010 at 1:02 am

    @farranger #7.
    Can’t you tell your representatives you don’t need a eucalyptus fired power plant, you want solar panels on your roof instead, and you want them manufactured close by to produce some needed jobs? You live in the south somewhere? You got plenty of sun? You say in your post you’re “sure all levels of the government would be willing” to hand out tax breaks for those trees. How bout solar? Government representatives don’t come up with great ideas by themselves; you gotta tell them what you want.

  9. 9.   Kevin Says:
    February 2nd, 2010 at 10:19 am

    @Martin – Aren’t you worried about drop bears?

  10. 10.   No Forest Trolls Says:
    February 2nd, 2010 at 3:23 pm

    Nick you’re a moron, you couldn’t be more wrong, and as you seem to like hearing yourself talk so much, try singing in the shower instead.

  11. 11.   jesse jones Says:
    February 2nd, 2010 at 5:55 pm

    Ask the Hawaians about these trees. I believe they have been a disaster.

  12. 12.   Goby Buckthorn Says:
    February 3rd, 2010 at 2:20 am

    What the F@#K! Do these bufoons have to get hit in the head by a flying carp to see the forest thru the kudzoo?

  13. 13.   Greg Says:
    February 16th, 2010 at 3:56 pm

    I think i might get some of these and plant them next to my buckthorn, burning bush, and siberian elm.

    nothing like an invasive garden.

    /sarcasm.

    id love to see the day where the world is educated on invasive species and how much harm they cause to our enviornment. could be spending those billions this problem costs elsewhere.

  14. 14.   robbie Says:
    February 23rd, 2010 at 1:09 am

    GM eucalyptus plantations around the George River in Tasmania have been found to be releasing toxins into the catchment areas & are contaminating drinking water supplies.
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/02/23/2827997.htm

Leave a Reply





    • 80beats Daily Newsletter

      Enter your email address:

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • RSS Feed

      The RSS feed for 80beats is here RSS.

    • Sci News in 140

      rockahn.net
    • on 80beats

      Recent Comments

      Comments

      • Mike on The Engineer Who Has “Saved More Lives Than Any Single Person in the History of Aviation”
      • Sarah Zhang on Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • m on The Engineer Who Has “Saved More Lives Than Any Single Person in the History of Aviation”
      • Pandora on Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Can on Massage Doesn’t Just Feel Good—It Changes Gene Expression and Reduces Inflammation
      • Brent on The Engineer Who Has “Saved More Lives Than Any Single Person in the History of Aviation”
      RSS Recent Posts

      Posts

      • Zebra Stripes: Fashion Statement or Fly Repellant?
      • Study: Americas + Europe + Asia Will Form Amasia, a Supercontinent in the Arctic
      • Video: Coral’s Dramatic Yet Slo-Mo Emergence From the Sea Floor
      • It’s a Shark-Eating Shark–Eating–Shark World
      • Solar Panels Sometimes Pit Global Warming Against Local Ecosystems
      Categories

      Categories

      • Environment
      • Feature
      • Health & Medicine
      • Human Origins
      • Journal Roundup
      • Living World
      • Mind & Brain
      • News Roundup
      • Photo Gallery
      • Physics & Math
      • Space
      • Technology
      • Top Posts
      • Uncategorized
      Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
    • About 80beats

      80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles on the day's most compelling topics.

      80beats is written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. This team darts through each day's science news faster than the ruby-throated hummingbird that beats its wings 80 times per second. Send ideas, tips, suggestions, and complaints to [azeeberg at discovermagazine dot com].



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us