Can Mom’s Diet Shape Baby’s Genes? Study of Pregnant Mice Suggests So

By Andrew Moseman | March 9, 2010 3:23 pm

pregnancyYou are what you eat, and perhaps in some ways, what your mother ate. Back in 2003, Cheryl Rosenfeld’s team found that the diet they fed to pregnant mice caused a “striking variation” in the sex ratios of the offspring: High fat favored males, low fat favored females. Now Rosenfeld has a new study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that says the mother’s diet can also affect the very way genes are expressed in the placenta.

To figure this out, Rosenfeld’s team studied the placentas attached to fetal mice 12 and a half days after conception, when the mice were midway through gestation but had yet to produce sex hormones like estrogen or testosterone (those can also alter gene expression, which would have confounded the study). They found that gene activity in the placentas differed significantly depending on whether the mom was fed a high- or low-fat diet. The biggest differences were found when comparing the high- and low-fat placentas linked to female fetal mice, suggesting that placentas nourishing females do a better job of responding to diet—and potentially protecting the fetus from harmful ingredients—than do those connected to males [ScienceNOW]. Specifically, of the 700 genes that they saw behave differently between the sexes, 651 were expressed more in females than males. In all, their study saw changes in the expression of nearly 2,000 genes.

The team can’t say for sure why diet affects either sex ratio or gene expression. Indeed, the analysis turned up changes in genes that affect things like kidney function and smell, which the scientists were not expecting to see. Whatever the reason these changes happen, they say, diet during pregnancy could have long-term health effects on children. Sons and daughters are also at different risk for conditions such as obesity or diabetes later in life, apparently related to either the mother’s diet or body condition while pregnant [The Times].

Biologist Jared Friedman, who didn’t work on the current study, says this will be an interesting area for future studies, but he’s not totally sold on the conclusion of Rosenfeld’s team yet. Males, he says, seem to lag behind females in all stages of development. Maybe those olfactory genes become more active in the male placenta as the pregnancy continues, he says. “Instead of 12.5 days, go to 19.5 and see if the differences are magnified or if the males catch up” [ScienceNOW].

Related Content:
80beats: Study: Biotech Mice With Two Moms (And No Dad) Live Longer
80beats: A Single Genetic Tweak Gives Mice Longer, Healthier Lives
DISCOVER: Vital Signs: A Dangerous Pregnancy
Reality Base: Later Pregnancy Gives Women More Money—And More Caesareans

Image: flickr / dizznbonn

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Health & Medicine, Living World
  • Jay Fox

    It seems that the specific methylation pattern present in the mother at the time of conception will be transferred to the fetus. The same could be inferred true of the male sperm when it is generated. These methylation patterns will alter the expression of whatever genes they modify.

    The double helix structure of DNA appears to be only part of what makes us, with methylation patterns further diversifying each of us from the other. Research is only beginning to tell this story. There is much to be learned.

    I would venture to say that with what we now know about how methylation effects expression, it will be discovered that these patterns will be determined to be the root cause of many currently unexplained conditions. Autism comes to mind.

    It remains to be seen exactly what environmental condition so tags the DNA that these defects occur. My guess is that certain plastics and chemicals such as insecticides leave a mark that lasts generations. If we only look at the DNA we will miss this. If you thought mapping the genome was hard, imagine all THESE variables.

  • http://www.baileyswines.com Colin Hall

    I’m sure that the mothers historic diet could have an effect upon both the DNA of both mother and child, but I would be very sceptical of any DNA effect from diet while the baby is in the womb. As far as I see it DNA is a list of all of the historic tests and trials that a mother and all of her ancestors have undertaken throughout the lives. The DNA is the living record of mankinds battle against their environment and is not altered as simply as through a few bad meals here and there.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »