"Top Kill" Effort to Staunch the Gulf Oil Flow Seems to Be Working

By Andrew Moseman | May 27, 2010 3:45 pm

100526-G-7444G-016After nearly forty days of wandering in the wilderness of failure and frustration, is this the time that BP finally closes off its oil leak?

There’s a glimmer of optimism in the Gulf of Mexico right now, as the “top kill” appears to have stopped the flow of oil. But with everything that’s happened so far, people are watching nervously and holding off on any celebration until we know the leak is sealed at last.

“They’ve been able to stabilize the wellhead, they’re pumping mud down it. They’ve stopped the hydrocarbons from coming up,” said Coast Guard chief Thad Allen, who is coordinating the US government’s battle against the oil spill. He told local radio WWL First News that BP “had some success overnight” but cautioned the British energy giant was “in a period of kind of wait and see right now where they see how the well stabilizes” [Discovery News].

The likelihood of long-term success grows with the passing hours, though, for the sake of caution, it may be tomorrow before BP declares victory on this. It took a lot of pumping heavy mud just to get to this point:

At first, most of the mud was carried away by the oil and gas streaming up through the well at high pressure, but with enough mud being pumped in at a fast enough rate, it started accumulating inside the well as intended. Unless something goes wrong, at some point, enough mud — and thus enough weight — would accumulate to overcome the upward pressure of the escaping oil and gas, and seal the well [The New York Times].

Even if BP does succeed, which we greatly hope that it does, the company then will have a furious public and U.S. government to face. As we noted earlier today, the new flow rate estimates by the U.S. Geological Survey mean that, even at best, the BP spill is already worse than the Exxon Valdez.

And then there are the shortcuts. During the Congressional investigation, witnesses have said BP chose a cheaper but riskier casing that provided just a single protective seal on the system rather than two.

BP’s decision was “without a doubt a riskier way to go,” said Greg McCormack, director of the Petroleum Extension Service at the University of Texas at Austin [CNBC].

Today, the Wall Street Journal published a long investigation into what caused the explosion in the first place. Behind schedule and over budget, they say, BP skipped quality control tests on Halliburton’s cement job, didn’t complete a test to remove gas from the well, and had a project manager who wasn’t experienced in deepwater drilling. That’s not all.

There were warning signs of a valve leak nearly five hours before the deadly gulf oil rig explosion, according to an internal BP investigation, which also found that a number of equipment and system failures may have caused the Deepwater Horizon disaster [Los Angeles Times].

Recent posts on the BP oil spill:
80beats: We Did the Math: BP Oil Spill Is Now Worse Than the Exxon Valdez
80beats: “Top Kill” Operation Is Under Way in Attempt to Stop Gulf Oil Leak
80beats: BP To Switch Dispersants; Will Kevin Costner Save Us All?
80beats: Scientists Say Gulf Spill Is Way Worse Than Estimated. How’d We Get It So Wrong?
80beats: 5 Offshore Oil Hotspots Beyond the Gulf That Could Boom—Or Go Boom

Image: U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Ann Marie Gorden.

  • http://clubneko.net nick

    They can claim as much success as they want, but the live video feed of the spill shows it gushing just as much. They cleverly claim that the visual state of the spill has nothing to do with how much oil is actually coming out and wont be indicative of success. But why should we believe them now, when they’ve been lying to us all along about this catastrophe?

    VIEW HERE! http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/homepage/STAGING/local_assets/bp_homepage/html/rov_stream.html

  • hare

    lets be real b in bp is BRITISH its not their coastline!

  • Albert Bakker

    Well okay, that didn’t work. They will now try to saw the damaged pipe off above the blow out preventer with a robot and then lower a cap on it.


  • Danlantic

    Hare, a partial correction there.

    I searched for the incorporation papers for BP’s US subsidiary but did not find them.

    By serendipity I did find a business report — a couple years old — which had the stockholders who have a percent or more.

    BP’s biggest stockholder was JP Morgan with 27.5%. That may have changed.

    So BP is as American as Wall Street. A properly designed excluder such as is required in other countries would have cut into JP Morgan’s profits.

  • r. coleman

    no reply sign me out

  • http://raptr.com/nathanmckenz615 Hemavati Chauhan

    I have figured out a lot reading this post. Undeniably high-quality material here. Articles such as this help make this weblog worth coming back to for more information.


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.

See More

Collapse bottom bar