Comments on: Can Physicists Make Quantum Entanglement Visible to the Naked Eye?

By: Rick

Rick — Mon, 29 Aug 2011 04:11:05 +0000

So what appears to be paranormal, is just science whose relationships are not yet fully understood.

Related research:

Global Consciousness
Quantum Mind
Pseudo-Telepathy

http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.5083

The soul and afterlife as a function of global consciousness.

Telekinesis
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=124268

Lots of speculation related to future applications of Quantum Entanglement.

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22quantum+entanglement%22+future+applications&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1

By: Darin Yzaquirre

Darin Yzaquirre — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:54:59 +0000

My spouse and i happen to be really contented in which Raymond can handle their inspections through the ideas he obtained while using the web site. It’s now and also once more puzzling to merely offer details that lots of some other folks have already been selling. We realize we have mcdougal saying thanks to because of this. The kind of illustrations you earn, the easy website navigation, the actual romances you help to engender ?ê? it really is almost everything extraordinary, and it’s also making our child and all of us feel that this issue will be pleasant, and that’s amazingly necessary. We appreciate you just about all!

By: Cazzi Enormi

Cazzi Enormi — Sat, 14 May 2011 16:21:27 +0000

Super post, Was so bored, this post made my night! LOL at some of ya guys!

By: Jones

Jones — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:01:57 +0000

Also I think it would be able to find an application or two in video monitoring system technology - extremely high framerate video recording anyone?

By: Jones

Jones — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:17:09 +0000

Does this mean that with a video monitoring system, we might be able to remotely see the actual calculating activity of a quantum cpu?

By: elizabeth

elizabeth — Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:49:04 +0000

Quantum entanglement? Hmmmmm . . . Is THAT what they’re calling it now?

By: elizabeth

elizabeth — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 23:09:28 +0000

Hmmmmm . . . this has some connection to the Heisenburg uncertainty principle – maybe.

By: Pamples

Pamples — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:37:17 +0000

I was married to a photon once, but it ran away with my ham sandwich.

By: Joseph Calamia

Joseph Calamia — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:13:14 +0000

Tom,

Thanks so much for the comment and catch! I just changed it.

-Joseph Calamia

By: Tom Marcinko

Tom Marcinko — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:42:38 +0000

Great metaphor, great post.

Apostrophe abuse in third from last graf, though. Should be “its,” not “it’s.”

Entangled to punctuation, me, I guess. :)