Comments on: Fermilab Particle Physicists Wonder: Are There 5 Higgs Bosons?

By: Siddharth Modi

Siddharth Modi — Sat, 11 Sep 2010 04:53:42 +0000

recall heisenberg’s proposal, it is difficult pinpoint the momentum and space coordinates of electrons simultaneously. This laws fail in the case of higgs boson. The five higgs boson are the energy manifestation of only one boson and they are for such a short time it is difficult to detect them. It is similar to the states of electrons when we speak in terms of quantum computers.

By: kamal jeetsingh

kamal jeetsingh — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:54:02 +0000

itwould be better if scientiss focus on Naada (sound)rather than particles for understanding how mass is gathered.
it would also be beneficial if research is done on THOUGHTS as a form of Life.

By: Sylwester Kornowski

Sylwester Kornowski — Sat, 03 Jul 2010 07:38:58 +0000

The law of conservation of energy leads to conclusion that matter and energy are eternal. A creation of, for example, our Universe from nothing (i.e. in truly empty volume = 0D volume) is impossible. My theory shows that the experimental data lead to the eternal Newtonian spacetime – it is gas composed of tachyons having positive mass. The tachyons fill the infinite 0D volume. The phase transitions of this spacetime lead to the Einstein spacetime (it is gas composed of the non-rotating binary systems of neutrinos – it is very difficult to detect such gas), to the atom-like structure of baryons, to the objects before the big bangs suited to life (there was infinite number of such big bangs), to the all physical constants and mathematical constants applied in physics. In the Einstein’s spacetime appear the fractals. Evolution of the objects before big bangs suited to life leads to the dark matter and dark energy.

By: Lonny Eachus

Lonny Eachus — Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:31:39 +0000

Mr. Kornowski:

It appears to me that there is one fundamental flaw in your argument: you are assuming the existence of an “Einstein” spacetime BEFORE the “Big Bang”. But the Big Bang itself is what is supposed to have created Einsteinian spacetime. You might as well just say God did it or something.

By: nick

nick — Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:48:20 +0000

“For those who believe the Standard Model is nearly complete”

Oh haven’t we learnt anything?

“In 1900, Lord Kelvin famously stated, “There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now. All that remains is more and more precise measurement.” Five years later, Albert Einstein published his paper on special relativity, which challenged the very simple set of rules laid down by Newtonian mechanics, which had been used to describe force and motion for over three hundred years.”

Newton ruled for 300 years. Einstein and the standard model have around a century of rule. In 50 years or so, they’re due to be toppled. Human knowledge exponentially increases. I may be off by a couple decades, but just wait: we ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

By: Sylwester Kornowski

Sylwester Kornowski — Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:40:41 +0000

To understand the difference between the general relativity and the quantum physics we must know internal structure of the Einstein spacetime and bare particles. Assume that the Einstein spacetime is a gas composed of the non-rotating binary systems of neutrinos. Since the non-rotating binary systems cannot transfer any energy to a detector, it is very difficult to detect such spacetime. When particles appear as the particle-antiparticle pairs then the Einstein spacetime is more symmetrical. It leads to conclusion that in the Einstein spacetime can appear rotary vortex-antivortex pairs and sometimes the distance between the components of a pair can be, in cosmic scale, very large. From one of such left-handed rotary vortex arose an object before the big bang. Due to its evolution, there appeared our early Universe. We see that the symmetry of the Einstein spacetime was broken inside the left-handed vortex already before the big bang. The different behavior of matter and antimatter is due to the local asymmetry of the Einstein spacetime caused by the phenomena before the big bang, not due to a matter-antimatter asymmetry. In my opinion, it changes our vision of nature very much. Particles acquire their masses due to the laws of conservation of spin and energy.

By: Albert Bakker

Albert Bakker — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:54:55 +0000

And still nobody has said the Zeus Higgs. I’m not going to make that mistake either. Higgs bosons get their mass by moving as a particle through the Higgs field, just like all the other particles with mass get theirs. It may have the appearance of being self-referential, but the reason why it is not lies in the difference between the Higgs-field and (the) Higgs boson(s).

Here’s a very simple analogy:
http://www.coimbra.lip.pt/atlas/higgsmec.htm

By: Georg

Georg — Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:45:10 +0000

So,
which “Overhiggs” will give those 5 Higgses their mass?