Gene Therapy Hope for HIV: Engineered Stem Cells Hold Promise

By Joseph Calamia | June 17, 2010 3:59 pm

lymphomaWhen it comes to research on HIV and AIDS treatments, it can be hard to know when to celebrate a small advance–everyone wants to see progress, but so many experimental avenues that seemed promising have turned out to be dead ends. Still, a new study that tried a sophisticated form of gene therapy as an HIV treatment seems cause for cautious optimism. If it bears out under further testing, the technique could lead to a one-shot, long-lasting treatment that could replace the punishing regimen of daily medications.

Treating HIV currently comes down to managing the viral load with a mixture antiretroviral drugs. Researcher John Rossi and his colleagues tried to craft a more direct treatment by genetically modifying the HIV-infected patients’ own blood stem cells and increasing the cells’ ability to fight off the virus. The researchers weren’t able to truly combat the virus in this experiment–the patients’ viral loads remained the same–but their work moved beyond previous attempts in two ways: They successfully modified blood stem cells by giving them anti-HIV genes, and those cells survived for two years in patients.

Earlier clinical studies the group conducted with the same strategy made little headway, but now the researchers have overcome two key obstacles, says Rossi, a molecular geneticist. One is that they managed to stitch the anti-HIV genes into a high percentage of the appropriate stem cells. The other is that the cells lived for a long time. “If we could increase the number of modified cells by 10- or 100-fold, we might be able to stop the virus itself,” says Rossi. [ScienceNow]

The small study published in Science Translational Medicine tested the safety of the technique for HIV-infected patients, and served as a proof of concept. The four patients in this study were undergoing therapy for AIDS-related lymphoma at City of Hope cancer center in California. Part of the usual treatment for this condition is to remove blood stem cells (found in bone marrow) before cell-damaging chemotherapy, and to then return them after treatment. Researchers wanted to test their virus-fighting cells’ survival skills, so with each patient’s normal blood stem cells, the researchers also reintroduced a small number of modified cells.

They modified the cells in three ways: They boarded up the cells’ doors to keep the HIV virus out, and made two genetic changes to the cells’ internal defenses so that the virus would have a harder time copying itself if it made it through.

[T]he team added three genes to the immune stem cells’ DNA: one that cripples the CCR5 receptor that HIV exploits to enter the cell (this mimics a successful transplant recently done in Berlin with a much discussed patient who apparently was “cured” of his HIV infection), and two others that disable viral genes and prevent HIV from copying itself. This makes it increasingly difficult for HIV to find new targets and mops up any new virus produced [ScienceNOW].

As a safety precaution, the researchers didn’t implant enough of these novel cells to test how well they might fight the virus, but they did get a glimpse of how long the modified cells could stay in a person’s system. Up to two years after the treatment, patients still had low levels of these special cells.

“That’s a major finding,” Rossi added. While the number of cells expressing those genes was too low to provide any therapeutic benefit, it’s “proof of principle” that gene therapy may provide long-term HIV treatment, he said. [The Scientist]

As a next step, researchers hope to implant a greater number of modified cells in patients, to see how well they can fight and how long their defenses hold.

Related content:
80beats: Did the Eradication of Smallpox Accidentally Help the Spread of HIV?
80beats: Researchers Track the HIV Virus to a Hideout in the Bone Marrow
80beats: S. African HIV Plan: Universal Testing & Treatment Could End the Epidemic
80beats: If Everyone Got An Annual AIDS Test, Could We Beat Back the Epidemic?
80beats: Beware of Hype: AIDS “Cure” is Good Science, But Won’t Halt the Epidemic

Image: flickr / euthman

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Health & Medicine
  • Henry

    You state, “Treating HIV currently comes down to controlling the viral load with a mixture antiretroviral drugs, but over time, this drug cocktail becomes less effective.” Antiretroviral drugs do not become less effective over time. That could only happen if a person is not properly adherent to the medications and misses too many doses. This is what can lead to suboptimal levels of drugs in the body, opening the door for the virus to possibly mutate and become resistant. A person on an effective drug cocktail who is adherent will not have problems with the virus mutating or with the medications becoming less effective.

  • Joseph Calamia

    Henry,

    Thanks very much for the comment. You are right; if patients strictly adhere to the regimen, the drugs can remain effective.

    More information about highly active antiretroviral therapy is available here: http://www.globalhealthreporting.org/diseaseinfo.asp?id=261

    Thanks again for the catch, and sorry for the mistake. I’ve changed the line in the post.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »