<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How (and Why) to Chuck a Quantum Physics Experiment Down a Drop Shaft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/06/19/how-and-why-to-chuck-a-quantum-physics-experiment-down-a-drop-shaft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/06/19/how-and-why-to-chuck-a-quantum-physics-experiment-down-a-drop-shaft/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: donepezil no prescription</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/06/19/how-and-why-to-chuck-a-quantum-physics-experiment-down-a-drop-shaft/#comment-19974</link>
		<dc:creator>donepezil no prescription</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=16386#comment-19974</guid>
		<description>etiCYN mmmm sandwitch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>etiCYN mmmm sandwitch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/06/19/how-and-why-to-chuck-a-quantum-physics-experiment-down-a-drop-shaft/#comment-19973</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 15:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=16386#comment-19973</guid>
		<description>You know Joseph, I actually wrote about this topic earlier on my own site. This post has really provided me with some food for thought, I think that you make some very interesting points. In fact, I wish I had found it before writing my own article. - bowlegged148</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know Joseph, I actually wrote about this topic earlier on my own site. This post has really provided me with some food for thought, I think that you make some very interesting points. In fact, I wish I had found it before writing my own article. &#8211; bowlegged148</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CESRnCLEO</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/06/19/how-and-why-to-chuck-a-quantum-physics-experiment-down-a-drop-shaft/#comment-19972</link>
		<dc:creator>CESRnCLEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=16386#comment-19972</guid>
		<description>Not sure what they mean by 10-6g.

The piano will move the earth more but it will be negligible, even on the quantum scale.  It will even be small compared to the tides or people in China waking up and standing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what they mean by 10-6g.</p>
<p>The piano will move the earth more but it will be negligible, even on the quantum scale.  It will even be small compared to the tides or people in China waking up and standing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaberwokWSA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/06/19/how-and-why-to-chuck-a-quantum-physics-experiment-down-a-drop-shaft/#comment-19971</link>
		<dc:creator>JaberwokWSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=16386#comment-19971</guid>
		<description>First, how did it experence 10-6g?  Doesn&#039;t a falling object fall at 1g?

Second, a piano will theoretically fall faster than a pebble, because the piano will pull the earth towards itself more as it falls, and will thus reach the ground sooner.  Granted, the amount is infinitesimal, but if you are talking quantum scales, do these differences matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, how did it experence 10-6g?  Doesn&#8217;t a falling object fall at 1g?</p>
<p>Second, a piano will theoretically fall faster than a pebble, because the piano will pull the earth towards itself more as it falls, and will thus reach the ground sooner.  Granted, the amount is infinitesimal, but if you are talking quantum scales, do these differences matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hellodave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/06/19/how-and-why-to-chuck-a-quantum-physics-experiment-down-a-drop-shaft/#comment-19970</link>
		<dc:creator>Hellodave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=16386#comment-19970</guid>
		<description>This is a fascinating experiment, the recent advances of physics are simply amazing, and their potential benefits are enormous. Good article, see mine on physics theories here: http://hubpages.com/hub/Top-Ten-Physics-Theories-You-Should-Know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fascinating experiment, the recent advances of physics are simply amazing, and their potential benefits are enormous. Good article, see mine on physics theories here: <a href="http://hubpages.com/hub/Top-Ten-Physics-Theories-You-Should-Know" rel="nofollow">http://hubpages.com/hub/Top-Ten-Physics-Theories-You-Should-Know</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
