<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASA Satellites Use Lasers to Map the Worldâ€™s Tallest Forests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/07/21/nasa-satellites-use-lasers-to-map-the-world’s-tallest-forests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/07/21/nasa-satellites-use-lasers-to-map-the-worlds-tallest-forests/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruder in der badewan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/07/21/nasa-satellites-use-lasers-to-map-the-worlds-tallest-forests/#comment-20744</link>
		<dc:creator>bruder in der badewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=17782#comment-20744</guid>
		<description>very very nice post. Thanks admin....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very very nice post. Thanks admin&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MNiceLady</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/07/21/nasa-satellites-use-lasers-to-map-the-worlds-tallest-forests/#comment-20743</link>
		<dc:creator>MNiceLady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=17782#comment-20743</guid>
		<description>Probably anything under 50 feet is not considered the tallest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably anything under 50 feet is not considered the tallest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Moseman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/07/21/nasa-satellites-use-lasers-to-map-the-worlds-tallest-forests/#comment-20742</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Moseman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=17782#comment-20742</guid>
		<description>@wildmonky That was my reaction when I first saw the maps, too. Obviously there are trees in the tan areas on both maps, but evidently not enough to qualify as &quot;forested&quot; when the data was processed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@wildmonky That was my reaction when I first saw the maps, too. Obviously there are trees in the tan areas on both maps, but evidently not enough to qualify as &#8220;forested&#8221; when the data was processed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildmonky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/07/21/nasa-satellites-use-lasers-to-map-the-worlds-tallest-forests/#comment-20741</link>
		<dc:creator>wildmonky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=17782#comment-20741</guid>
		<description>Anyone else see this map and think how few forests we have on this planet? Though to be fair I think only the tallest forests are shown here? Still, comparatively, it looks like almost no trees on the planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else see this map and think how few forests we have on this planet? Though to be fair I think only the tallest forests are shown here? Still, comparatively, it looks like almost no trees on the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
