DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
80beats
« An Active Orangutan Burns Fewer Calories Than a Lazy Human
EPA on Oil Dispersants: No More Toxic Than Oil Alone »

Antarctic Particle Detector Buried in Ice Records Cosmic Ray Weirdness

icecube_skymap_22string09Detectors buried thousands of feet under the Antarctic ice recently confirmed a mysterious cosmic lopsidedness. Though it might seem reasonable for our planet to receive energetic particles, called cosmic rays, on average from all directions equally, more cosmic rays’ seem to approach Earth from certain preferred directions.

The IceCube Neutrino Observatory, which is still under construction, confirmed these odd cosmic ray preferences, previously detected in the northern hemisphere.

Cosmic rays–energetic particles flung from as nearby as the sun and light years away–are the extra “noise” in the observatory’s experiments; to filter out this noise, researchers needed to map where the cosmic rays are coming from. In a paper published earlier this month in The Astrophysical Journal they confirmed that more cosmic rays seem to come from certain directions–an observation known as anisotropy–in the Earth’s southern hemisphere too.

[T]hey used IceCube to study a longstanding puzzle: whether the distribution of cosmic ray arrivals is uneven across the southern sky, as scientists have previously observed in the northern hemisphere. Indeed, the team found, IceCube detected a disproportionate number of cosmic rays arriving from some parts of the sky. But the reason for this uneven distribution remains unclear. [ScienceNOW]

Physicists designed the detector to search for neutrinos–particles that race through most matter without a trace. The detector picks them up only in the off-chance that they slam into matter, making a brief-lived and only slightly more detectable particle called a muon. The problem is that the detector also picks up muons created when cosmic rays collide with matter in our atmosphere and the muons make their ways into the underground detectors. So the researchers must weed out these cosmic ray-created muons (by studying their paths through the detector). Still, observing the direction of these muons’ arrivals has proven an interesting study on its own.

“IceCube was not built to look at cosmic rays. Cosmic rays are considered background,” said University of Wisconsin-Madison researcher Rasha Abbasi in a statement. “However, we have billions of events of background downward cosmic rays that ended up being very exciting.” [LiveScience]

The completed detector will have almost four times the sensors of the 2007-2008 partially-built system that collected the data for this published study. This may help researchers uncover the cause of this uneven barrage of energetic particles.

The IceCube group is currently extending its analysis to improve its understanding of the anisotropy on a more detailed scale and delve further into its possible causes. While the newly published study used data collected in 2007 and 2008 from just 22 strings of optical detectors in the IceCube telescope, they are now analyzing data from 59 of the 79 strings that are in place to date. When completed in 2011, the National Science Foundation-supported telescope will fill a cubic kilometer of Antarctic ice with 86 strings containing more than 5,000 digital optical sensors. [University of Wisconsin-Madison]

They suspect that the particles may originate from a supernova, such as the nearby supernova remnant Vela, or that perhaps the preferred direction results from interstellar magnetic fields which could steer the particles into these preferred approaches.

“At the beginning, we didn’t know what to expect. To see this anisotropy extending to the Southern Hemisphere sky is an additional piece of the puzzle around this enigmatic effect — whether it’s due to the magnetic field surrounding us or to the effect of a nearby supernova remnant, we don’t know,” Abbasi says…. “This is exciting because this effect could be the ‘smoking gun’ for our long-sought understanding of the source of high-energy cosmic rays.” [University of Wisconsin-Madison]

Related content:
80beats: A Particle Physics First: Researchers Watch Neutrinos Change Flavors
80beats: Physicists Shoot Neutrinos Across Japan to an Experiment in an Abandoned Mine
80beats: LHC Beam Zooms Past 1 Trillion Electron Volts, Sets World Record
DISCOVER: Ice Fishing for Neutrinos From the Middle of the Galaxy

Image: University of Wisconsin-Madison / IceCube Neutrino Observatory

Share

August 3rd, 2010 1:35 PM Tags: cosmology, IceCube Neutrino Observatory, muons, neutrinos, particle physics, subatomic particles
by Joseph Calamia in Physics & Math, Space | 6 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

6 Responses to “Antarctic Particle Detector Buried in Ice Records Cosmic Ray Weirdness”

  1. 1.   Rhacodactylus Says:
    August 3rd, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    “The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
    discoveries, is not ‘Eureka!’ (I found it!) but ‘That’s funny…’ ”
    – Isaac Asimov

  2. 2.   Space Bear Says:
    August 3rd, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    I’m a fan of “oh”s

  3. 3.   Justin Lapp (ActualityScience) Says:
    August 4th, 2010 at 4:01 am

    A for building a facility that makes discoveries on topics it was not even designed for.
    A+ for noticing the discoveries.

  4. 4.   JaberwokWSA Says:
    August 4th, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    I need a physicist to explain this. You can detect a cosmic ray by looking for their collision-created muon, yes? You can observe the path of the muon from the point of collision, understood. But, how can you determine what direction the cosmic ray came from by looking at the path of only the muon?

    It’s like saying you can determine the direction of the cue ball solely by looking at the path of the eight ball. Are all collisions strictly linear? Wouldn’t an offset collision produce a muon path that was not colinear to the initial cosmic ray path? I could understand how you could determine the original path if there were two or more muons from the collision. Is this the case? How do quantum affects come in to play, since you are dealing with photons?

  5. 5.   Kevin Says:
    August 4th, 2010 at 1:31 pm

    I know it’s wrong, but I keep picturing the actor Ice Cube performing these experiments.

  6. 6.   Eliza Strickland Says:
    August 6th, 2010 at 1:03 pm

    @ Kevin: Ha! Maybe the researchers could arrange for him to be their celebrity spokesman.

    – Eliza, DISCOVER online news editor

Leave a Reply





    • 80beats Daily Newsletter

      Enter your email address:

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • RSS Feed

      The RSS feed for 80beats is here RSS.

    • Sci News in 140

      rockahn.net
    • on 80beats

      Recent Comments

      Comments

      • Bee on Flaming Rocks That Ignited in Woman’s Pocket Were Coated in Phosphorus
      • jaykimball on This Tiny Sphere is All the World’s Water
      • jaykimball on And THIS Tiny Sphere is All the World’s Water *That We Can Use*
      • Dave Christensen on Come For the Beautiful “Glass Gem” Corn; Stay for a Dose of Genetics
      • onlyme on And THIS Tiny Sphere is All the World’s Water *That We Can Use*
      • floodmouse on What’s Wrong With the Coffee Mortality Study? You Tell Us.
      RSS Recent Posts

      Posts

      • Flaming Rocks That Ignited in Woman’s Pocket Were Coated in Phosphorus
      • A Massive National Effort to Study Children Is Threatened
      • And THIS Tiny Sphere is All the World’s Water *That We Can Use*
      • Up Close and Personal With the Mysterious “Placental Jellyfish”
      • What’s Wrong With the Coffee Mortality Study? You Tell Us.
      Categories

      Categories

      • Environment
      • Feature
      • Health & Medicine
      • Human Origins
      • Journal Roundup
      • Living World
      • Mind & Brain
      • News Roundup
      • Photo Gallery
      • Physics & Math
      • Space
      • Technology
      • Top Posts
      • Uncategorized
      Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
    • About 80beats

      80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles on the day's most compelling topics.

      80beats is written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. This team darts through each day's science news faster than the ruby-throated hummingbird that beats its wings 80 times per second. Send ideas, tips, suggestions, and complaints to [azeeberg at discovermagazine dot com].



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us