For two years, the Chinese science satellite SJ-06F flew solo orbits around the Earth (or, as solo as a machine could be in the expanding haze of space junk in orbit). But now it has a partner: Last month China executed the delicate maneuver of aligning another satellite launched this year, SJ-12, with its older counterpart.
Only the United States had executed such a satellite rendezvous before this, and it shows off China’s advancement in satellite sophistication. Three years ago the country blew one of its satellites to smithereens in a practice test—a test that created thousands of additional chunks of debris in orbit. The satellite meet-up is a more elegant trick, and one whose implications could be sinister or benign. Let’s explore both possibilities.
Don’t Worry
China’s game of catch-up, which has its space program closing in on America’s abilities in orbit, strikes fear into the hearts of some politicos. But malfeasance need not be the aim of the satellite maneuver.
“This set of skills serves a whole lot of purposes,” says Dean Cheng, a Chinese policy expert with the Heritage Foundation, a think tank in Washington DC. The most immediate application, Cheng says, may be testing sensors and control systems to help pave the way for docking procedures to be used with China’s first space station module, Tiangong-1, which is set to launch in 2011. “This sort of thing may very well be consistent with wanting to test drive the hardware and software before you test it on your space laboratory,” Cheng says. [New Scientist]
And speaking of space junk (as we were earlier), this kind of procedure could be used in the future to clear out the defunct equipment and debris that clogs the space around our planet and threatens useful machinery in orbit.
What of the worry that China could dock with our satellites and interfere with them? Brian Weeden of the Secure World Foundation, who I talked to for a story in the September issue of DISCOVER, tracked the rendezvous and says that’s unlikely. Weeden, whose organization is devoted to the peaceful use of space, says that there are easier ways to mess with enemy satellites, like shooting them with lasers from the ground.
OK, Worry
Whether or not China is pursuing space warfare in this instance, the country is certainly trying to measure up to whatever the United States can do.
“The Chinese would be absolutely incompetent to not be trying to reduce U.S advantage in space,” James Oberg, a former NASA space engineer specializing in orbital rendezvous, tells Danger Room. “No potential adversary in their right mind would give us permanent advantage in space operations.” [Wired.com]
China might not need rendezvous capability to tinker with another country’s satellites, but it would need that capability to spy on them—taking an up-close look at the competitor’s product. There may be no way to gauge true intentions.
According to Oberg, the satellite meet-up occurred in an orbit almost exclusively devoted to earth observation — spy and weather satellites, for example — where “a potential adversary would be most interested in rendezvousing. On the other hand, it’s also where a satellite might need refueling,” he adds. “It’s like you could be changing a screwdriver for a hammer, or you could be turning a peaceful ‘bot into a killer one.” [Wired.com]
Related Content:
DISCOVER: Space Junk: How To Clean Up the Space Age’ Mess (Photo Gallery)
80beats: China’s “Heavenly Palace” Space Station Module Due to Launch in 2011
80beats: A Smashing Finale: China’s Lunar Probe Crashes Into the Moon
80beats: After a Successful Spacewalk, Chinese Astronauts Return Home
80beats: Video: Navy’s New Laser Weapon Shoots Down Drones
80beats: Amateur Sky-Watchers Track the Air Force’s Super-Secret Space Plane
Image: ESA
September 1st, 2010 at 3:10 pm
I love people who’s minds go immediately to “China could only be doing this to destroy our satellites,” not everything in the world is zero sum guys, sometimes peoples motives aren’t sinister.
September 1st, 2010 at 5:22 pm
@Rhacodactylus I have to image that the answer to “is this sinister or benign?” is truly “both.”
September 1st, 2010 at 5:47 pm
@Rhacodactylus : Everything is zero sum when your budget depends on scaring a country into spending half a trillion dollars a year defending against the shadow puppets you’re casting.
I’d like to point out that in the right (or maybe wrong?) hands, both a screwdriver and a hammer can be weapons of violence – the objects themselves don’t matter, the intentions of the wielder are the only things that matter.
Instead of screaming “The Chineseseses are gonna gets us! Attack them first!” Why don’t we focus on figuring out how to defend against satellite sized chunks of space junk – i.e. have a system on satellites that warn/evade/destroy anything getting close enough without talking back. At the very least some spraypaint or paintballs to target incoming camera-like objects. :) Bonus: Newtonian physics will propel you farther away from the incoming maybe-hostile when you shoot the spraypaint or paintballs at them.
September 2nd, 2010 at 2:45 pm
The Chinese are more peaceful than the US! Why don’t you compare nuclear arsenals? To accuse the Chinese of preparing for war just because they’re advancing their technical abilities in space is just plain ridiculous!
A much more plausible theory is that Discover thought the story needed something extra so they tried to juice it up…
September 3rd, 2010 at 2:50 pm
@Wesley:
Chinese more peaceful than us? Surely you jest sir. No, they aren’t trying to start a war with us (they don’t need to, they just need to call in our debts to destroy us), but they are certainly not peaceful. Consider the ethnic destruction of the Tibetans and the ousting of the Dalai Llama from his home country. My point is, they don’t need nukes, nukes are old hat or for terrorists, no country in their right mind needs them anymore, all they need to do is have massive leverage on a global market, or a huge army.