Physicists Claim to Have Spotted Sought-After Hawking Radiation

By Andrew Moseman | September 27, 2010 5:18 pm

NASABlackHoleIt’s one of Stephen Hawking‘s most famous hypotheses (though one often co-credited to other researchers): According to the rules of quantum mechanics, a black hole—from which nothing should be able to escape—actually can emit material in the form of Hawking radiation. In the thirty-plus years since the reknowned physicist made his prediction Hawking radiation has remained theoretical, but a research team now claims to have seen it right in the lab.

First, a quick refresher on Hawking radiation:

Physicists have long realised that on the smallest scale, space is filled with a bubbling melee of particles leaping in and out of existence. These particles form as particle-antiparticle pairs and rapidly annihilate, returning their energy to the vacuum. Hawking’s prediction came from thinking about what might happen to particle pairs that form at the edge of a black hole. He realised that if one of the pair were to cross the event horizon, it could never return. But its partner on the other side would be free to go. [Technology Review]

The lonesome, unpaired particles streaming away would make it appear that the black hole was emitting radiation, Hawking argued.
The bad news is, you can’t just hunt for a black hole in space to study. Black holes decay faster the smaller they are, meaning the big ones out in space would require practically an eternity to evaporate through Hawking radiation. And the tiny ones, like those feared by people who thought the Large Hadron Collider would mean the end of the world, evaporate almost instantly.

But Franco Belgiorno and his team, the researchers who claim to have seen Hawking radiation in their lab, say they don’t need a black hole. They write in their study: “The essential ingredient of Hawking radiation was not the astrophysical black hole itself but rather the space-time curvature associated to the event horizon.” So they tried to create that curvature a different way.

They’ve produced Hawking radiation by firing an intense laser pulse through a so-called nonlinear material, that is one in which the light itself changes the refractive index of the medium. As the pulse moves through the material, so too does the change in refractive index, creating a kind of bow wave in which the refractive index is much higher than the surrounding material. [Technology Review]

Eventually, this can create what’s called a white hole event horizon, a point beyond which light cannot penetrate. Yet, the team writes:

We report experimental evidence of photon emission that on the one hand bears the characteristics of Hawking radiation and on the other is distinguishable and thus separate from other known photon emission mechanisms.

Again, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, so now we await the experiments to come that will try to repeat this find and see whether Belgiorno’s team has really done it.

Related Content:
DISCOVER: The Extremely Long Odds Against the Destruction of Earth (why you shouldn’t worry about the LHC)
80beats: Hawking Says God Not Needed to Kick-Start Big Bang; World Freaks Out
80beats: Hawking: If Humans Survive a Couple Centuries, We’ll Get Off This Rock
80beats: This May Sound Strange: Sonic Lasers and Sonic Black Holes

Image: NASA

  • Rhacodactylus

    Dear god, a Hawking related story about physics? I’m not sure what to do with this.

  • Dante The Canadian

    Valentine you make a strong point. Much of today’s physic’s is so theoretical that very little science is there to support the theories. Too often theories are stated as truths before they are tested or observed only for the statement makers to have to go back and adjust their theorums because the evidence shows differently.

  • Eliza Strickland

    Apologies for the non sequitor here — I deleted Valentine’s comment because it seemed very far afield from the topic at hand.

    –Eliza, DISCOVER online news editor

  • valentine s. goroshko

    In order for experiment to be valid, one must experiment & observe the matter at hand ,whatever the name is given, that is to say the real thing- so called Black Hole. Presently scientists don’t know the nature of Radiation & How it transforms into matter(mass)-the basics. Only unified Micro/Macro/Understanding of spatial/propagational/parameters will solve this riddle: Convertibility, Equivalency, Conservancy,etc. E=C & 0c. -VG

  • Hugh A. Lane

    Howdy! I simply wish to give a huge thumbs up for the nice information you’ve right here on this post. I will probably be coming again to your blog for more soon.

  • Ryan

    Good morning to you friend, many thanks for sharing this posting (it is one of my favourites on the site thus far). All the best to you.


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.

See More

Collapse bottom bar