<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Excited Should We Be About the New &quot;Goldilocks&quot; Exoplanet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/09/30/how-excited-should-we-be-about-the-new-goldilocks-exoplanet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/09/30/how-excited-should-we-be-about-the-new-goldilocks-exoplanet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gliese</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/09/30/how-excited-should-we-be-about-the-new-goldilocks-exoplanet/#comment-22430</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gliese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 06:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=20770#comment-22430</guid>
		<description>The only plausible explanation that works is that ourselves and everything we know and see from in front of us to Gliese 581 and beyond are computer generated algorithms.
Follow this guy on twitter for humor on life on gliese 581

http://twitter.com/RealGliese581</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only plausible explanation that works is that ourselves and everything we know and see from in front of us to Gliese 581 and beyond are computer generated algorithms.<br />
Follow this guy on twitter for humor on life on gliese 581</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/RealGliese581" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/RealGliese581</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torbjörn Larsson, OM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/09/30/how-excited-should-we-be-about-the-new-goldilocks-exoplanet/#comment-22429</link>
		<dc:creator>Torbjörn Larsson, OM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 01:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=20770#comment-22429</guid>
		<description>Exactly.

But ironically, we have found _the next_ habitable planet, so we can make Earth count. Conversely, if Gliese 581 g is an erroneous prediction (small signal, possible systematic errors), it will still define a &quot;habitability search volume&quot; despite being in error since it is a possible positive! (Much so now, but even so then.) Since Earth remains, it would only halve the observed ~10-30 % habitability frequency of stars.

Statistics and its backbreaking logic - you gotta love it. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.</p>
<p>But ironically, we have found _the next_ habitable planet, so we can make Earth count. Conversely, if Gliese 581 g is an erroneous prediction (small signal, possible systematic errors), it will still define a &#8220;habitability search volume&#8221; despite being in error since it is a possible positive! (Much so now, but even so then.) Since Earth remains, it would only halve the observed ~10-30 % habitability frequency of stars.</p>
<p>Statistics and its backbreaking logic &#8211; you gotta love it. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhacodactylus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/09/30/how-excited-should-we-be-about-the-new-goldilocks-exoplanet/#comment-22428</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhacodactylus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=20770#comment-22428</guid>
		<description>People are acting as though how excited we should be depends on whether or not we find Green women on the planet.  Just the discovery of this type of planet in this position is positive news, because if we found one, there are likely many many more like it.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://untitledvanityproject.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;~Rhaco&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are acting as though how excited we should be depends on whether or not we find Green women on the planet.  Just the discovery of this type of planet in this position is positive news, because if we found one, there are likely many many more like it.</p>
<p><a href="http://untitledvanityproject.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">~Rhaco</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
