Hungary's Toxic Spill Reaches the Danube, but River May Escape Harm

By Andrew Moseman | October 8, 2010 10:55 am

toxic-sludge-twoThe rust-colored flood that has been spreading across Hungary all week after an alumina plant accident on Monday is far from contained, and five deaths have been attributed to the wave of toxic sludge so far. Responders there say, however, that at least the worst has been avoided.

The blue Danube turned red?

After the spill began spreading, the concern that jumped off the page when you looked at a map was that the stuff would reach rivers that feed the Danube. Europe’s second-longest river (after the Volga in Russia) weaves its way past Hungary through Croatia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine, and on into the Black Sea.

Indeed, parts of the spill reached the Danube on Wednesday, but Hungarian responders say today that pH of the main river is just over 8, down from about 9 when the material first arrived. Neutral pH is 7, but a range of about 6.5 to 8.5 is considered a safe zone for consumption.

Hungarian disaster officials said alkaline levels in the Danube were normal after emergency crews poured plaster and acetic acid (vinegar) into rivers that flowed into it. “These data give us hope … and we have not experienced any damage on the main Danube so far,” Tibor Dobson, a Hungarian disaster spokesman, told Reuters. [The Guardian]

There were reports of dead fish in several of the smaller tributaries that feed into the Danube; in the small Marcal river, the first to be hit by the spill, all wildlife reportedly died. But officials are relieved that the much larger Danube doesn’t appear to be in serious danger. If the industrial waste that reaches the Danube is sufficiently neutralized and diluted, then the main worry is back in Hungary where the breadth of the red sludge remains, flooding the village of Kolontar. If weather turns warmer, the material could start to dry out and potentially get into the air, creating the danger of inhalation.

How toxic is this stuff?

The red sludge, which now reportedly covers an area of 16 square miles, is waste created by an industrial plant that processes bauxite (an ore made of several aluminum minerals) into alumina (or aluminum oxide—a molecule of two aluminum atoms and three oxygen atoms), which will later be refined into aluminum.

Much of the spill is iron oxide, which is why it has that rust color. The other ingredients, like calcium oxide and silicon dioxide, help to make the sludge itself highly basic, up to around 13 in pH. Hydrogeologist Paul Younger explains:

In the most concentrated areas, he says, it could be compared to products you would clean your kitchen with, causing dry or cracked skin, or — in cases of prolonged contact — it can “lift off the top layer of your skin.” Scores of people have already suffered burns in affected areas, with at least 120 receiving treatment. [BBC News]

So how much should we worry about it making people sick in the long term?

Dr John Hoskins, a consultant toxicologist, says that while the initial spill was quite dangerous, there should not be any long-term impact on human health as long as the waste is cleaned up. “It will be neutralised by nature, because of rain which will dilute it and because of the chances that it will come into contact with slightly acidic substances in soil… but that will take a little time,” he says. For humans, he says, “the danger would essentially be in ingestion, which is unlikely.” [BBC News]

That’s the official consensus at the moment. But Greenpeace scientists are on the ground in Hungary, and they say they’ve found “surprisingly high” levels of arsenic and mercury in the red muck.

Could it happen in the United States?

Probably not, the AP reports, because alumina plants here don’t store their waste as a liquid. The few such plants that operate in the United States dry the material before it goes into storage, leaving it in a consistency more like damp earth than water.

The three U.S. facilities are not required to “dry stack” the waste. But Sandra Bailey, environmental manager at the Sherwin Alumina Co. in Gregory, Texas, said dry waste is easier to handle and is less toxic. Most of the waste in Sherwin’s facility is 80 percent solid and strong enough for heavy equipment to ride on, she said. [AP]

Related Content:
80beats: Toxic Sludge Floods Hungarian Countryside, Threatens the Danube River
80beats: After a Massive Tennessee Ash Spill, Authorities Try to Assess the Damage
DISCOVER: Beautiful Pools of Pollution
DISCOVER: Man’s Greatest Crimes Against the Earth, in Pictures

Image: Google Maps

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Environment
  • Georg

    First day
    press was full about “highly toxic” waste, due to “heavy metals”.
    This is typical wording from Greenpeace. Press repeated that
    eagerly. At that day nobody (exept the company) knew what the
    red mass contained aside of the general constituents in red slurry.
    The facts coming up today are not a theme in papers
    or TV news.
    This spill is really a mess, the peoples killed (by drowning
    presumably) are a real desaster. Why then this free running
    “highly poisonous” babble?
    Same thing about caustic properties, first named “extremely” .
    The fact, that any lime slurry or portland cement is as caustic
    does not appear in news.
    Georg

  • ChH

    silicon dioxide helps make the spill basic??
    That’s just sand, not some horrible industrial waste.

  • Gaythia

    I think that a pertinent quote from the AP article linked to above about US alumina plants is:

    “The waste has “almost every element on the periodic table,” including iron, which is what makes it red, Bailey said. “You will have lead, mercury, zinc, iron — just every metal you can think about,” she said.” As in the post above, the person quoted here is Sandra Bailey, environmental manager at the Sherwin Alumina Co.

    Also, I just looked at Gregory, Texas and Gramercy LA via Google satellite. Ponds and apparent red waste areas can be seen. The Gregory facility is near Corpus Cristi Bay, the Gramercy one is on the Mississippi. The plants need to have shipping access.

    Obviously, we have much better procedures than those that seem to have been employed in Hungary. According to the AP article, the waste storage beds are ultimately treated as landfills and covered and planted. But the locations would appear to complicate long term waste storage for these facilities, with dust, run-off, groundwater, flooding and hurricanes all as possible issues.

  • http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/10/08/hungarys-toxic-spill-reaches-the-danube-but-river-may-escape-harm/ cjikwanka

    i dont like this very much. mean.
    cause its rapin my waters..

  • http://www.vietecology.org Young Tran

    Today in the light of Hungary’s toxic red sludge spill, I humbly urge everyone to look into the potential of another Hungary environmental catastrophe in Central Highlands of Vietnam. Please refer to this newly posted petition, http://www.gopetition.com/petition/40122.html for more information.

    The Central Highlands of Vietnam, as its name implies, is located at the altitude of hundreds of meters above sea level, where it embraces over the livelihood of 14 million ethnic minorities and basin residents, the indigenous cultures, and the pristine, breathtaking natural environment.

    Our world should not lean toward the development model, which is driven by the short-term profit returns for a group of investors. But we rather support the ecologically sustainable development model, where economic growth, community harmony, and the environmental protection can be achieved and sustained in the long run.

    It is our Earth. And it has become ever so clearly that any local environmental catastrophe could trigger a serious regional, if not global crisis.

    Please support the petition and kindly help circulate it among friends and/or via any social networking means (e.g., facebook, twitter, myspace) that you possibly can.

    Together, we can help protect our Earth and promote a sustainable, greener world – not only for ourselves, but for many generations yet to come. Thank you.

    Young Tran
    Oregon, USA

  • Susanne Pearl

    Are there any residual effects of the aluminum spill in the Danube? We will are taking a river cruise in late May and wonder how the environment and river have been effected. I have not been successful finding any updated information. Thank you for your reply.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »