New Play Gives DNA Pioneer Rosalind Franklin Her Time in the Spotlight

By Eliza Strickland | November 2, 2010 5:04 pm

Franklin-1Rosalind Franklin would probably not have appreciated her posthumous reputation. First there was the colossal insult of being denied due credit for her role in the discovery of DNA’s double helix shape, a breakthrough that revealed not only the form of our genetic material, but also how it functioned. James Watson and Francis Crick received the lion’s share of the glory for that finding, and for decades Franklin was a historical footnote.

But it seems likely that this no-nonsense scientist wouldn’t have appreciated being reduced to a feminist cartoon either–more recently, she’s been held up as an example of a woman crushed by the good old boys network.

That’s why a new play at New York’s Ensemble Studio Theatre is so necessary, and so right on the money. The play, called Photograph 51, honors Franklin’s achievements and rues her relative obscurity, but it also returns to her the ambiguities and complexities that a real human being deserves.

Franklin-2It tells the dramatic tale of the race to the double helix in the years between 1951 and 1953, when Franklin and Maurice Wilkins were using X-ray diffraction to take the best images ever of DNA; the play is named after one particular photograph that showed its helical structure with striking clarity, which inspired Watson and Crick to build their double helix model. The researchers’ papers all came out in the same issue of Nature. But by the time the Nobel Prize was awarded for the work in 1962, Franklin had died (at the age of 37) from ovarian cancer, leaving Watson, Crick, and Wilkins to share the prize.

The play presents Franklin as a prickly and strong-willed woman who was sabotaged by her own personality: Distrustful of her colleagues and aware of her outsider status as a Jewish woman, she refused to collaborate with Watson and Crick, and was barely civil to her colleague Wilkins. If she had been willing to fraternize with the other scientists, could she have reached the double helix first? On the other hand, would a woman with a more accommodating spirit have gotten as far as Franklin did? Photograph 51 does Franklin the honor of raising these questions, but not trying to answer them.

The play continues until November 21st. I highly recommend it.

Related Content:
80beats: Long-Lost Letters From DNA Pioneers Reveal Conflicts and Tensions
DISCOVER: The 50 Most Important Women in Science
DISCOVER: Interview: James Watson
DISCOVER: Tribute: Francis Crick

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Health & Medicine, Living World
  • casey rentz

    A great account of her role in the discovery of the structure of DNA can be found in James Watson’s book Double Helix. It’s a great read.

  • Karla Shepard Rubinger

    This play is so important. The spotlight on Rosalind Franklin provides a very real account of the very real challenges for even exceptional women in science. We cannot afford to overlook half the world’s scientists! The Rosalind Franklin Society was created to address this issue at the highest levels, engaging men and women in academia, industry, venture capitalists, and public policy. (

  • humble reader

    A better, dedicated biography would be,
    “Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA”

  • ardee

    some kudos should be attributed to her niece, rosalind franklin – born in 1960, who has worked tirelessly to legitimise her aunt’s name and establish her work in the public eye!


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.

See More

Collapse bottom bar