Was Gold Brought to Earth by a Pluto-Sized Planet Crasher?

By Andrew Moseman | December 10, 2010 11:08 am

gold_barThe gold ring around your finger may symbolize “till death do us part” for you, but for scientists, it poses a problem.

That shiny band probably cost a small fortune at the jewelry store, but gold is actually abundant on the Earth’s surface (which helps explain why it’s the ideal form of money). The difficulty is, when scientists apply what they know about how the solar system formed, it’s hard to explain how all that gold (and other precious metals that bond easily to iron, like palladium and platinum) got into the Earth’s crust, where bling-loving humans could get at it. A new study in Science sets forth an explanation: In the Earth’s younger days, impacts by huge objects—perhaps even one as big as Pluto—may have brought it here.

To explain this theory, let’s start with the most dramatic impact in our planet’s history: the one that formed the moon and re-melted the solidifying Earth in the process.

Moon rocks brought back during the Apollo missions led to the now widely accepted theory that the moon formed when a Mars-size object crashed into early Earth. Energy from the impact would have spurred the still forming Earth to develop its mostly iron core. When this happened, iron-loving metals should have followed molten iron down from the planet’s mantle and into the core. But we know that gold and other iron-lovers are found in modest abundances in Earth’s mantle. [National Geographic]

The fact that gold and platinum settled on the surface and did not get sucked down below by molten iron appears to suggest the metals arrived via asteroids and other objects that hit the Earth after it started cooling down from moon-creating smash-up. It’s a nice and logical idea, but carries one problem: Where’s the gold on the moon?

The moon should have siderophiles [those iron-loving metals] too, and it doesn’t. Rock samples show that it has 1200 times fewer than Earth. So how to explain this discrepancy? Earth is bigger than the moon, so it attracted 20 times as much material, but that still left them with a factor of 60 to deal with. [New Scientist]

So William Bottke and his team modeled the early solar system, when “leftover planetesimal populations” were floating around after the planets we see today had formed. Bottke argues that larger objects would have dominated the scene the way that the largest asteroids, like Ceres and Vesta, are much bigger than the main population of the Asteroid Belt. If one of those Pluto-sized rocks whacked the Earth but missed the moon, he says, that could explain our siderophile discrepancy. It would also mean that gold’s place in human history in just a happy accident.

However, this argument doesn’t tie everything off with a neat little bow. There’s still one problem.

While the research presents some interesting new ideas, it has a number of problems, says Jay Melosh, a geophysicist from Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. Chiefly, Pluto-sized objects would themselves have a core of heavy elements and few highly siderophile elements on their surface, he says. These masses would have had to strike the Earth in just the right way to break open and spill their contents across the planet’s surface, he adds. The article does not make a compelling argument for how this could have happened, he says. [Nature]

Related Content:
DISCOVER: 20 Things You Didn’t Know About… Gold
DISCOVER: Gold in Them There Stars: Did gold and platinum arise from mergers of neutron stars?
DISCOVER: Earth’s Inner Fort Knox: The pot of gold at the center of the Earth.
80beats: New Bacterium Is Digesting the Titanic, One Iron Atom at a Time

Image: Wikimedia Commons

  • GlidingPig

    Or perhaps some large bodies were destroyed before hitting Earth and the pieces hit earth with those elements exposed already.

  • MaxTegmark

    The aliens that came to mine gold off the earth during Sumerian times found it easier to remove it from the moon, hence the absence.

  • http://aggregateuniverse.blogspot.com Tony P

    The sumarians.. lol.. mined from the moon? I like that one.. makes sense if you follow that mode of thinking. But I like the idea that the pieces broke apart before hitting the earth and had those metals already pre-exposed.

  • William Richardson

    The explanation that gold arrived on earth from another planet or object begs the question as to its origin on earth. If gold came from other objects where did those objects obtain the gold? If other objects formed gold why could earth not have the same or similar processes to form gold.
    Sorry, back to the research board for an explanation.

  • http://zythophile.wordpress.com Terry Collmann

    William Richardson: what the article says (or implies) is that Earth probably DID have original gold, but Earth’s original gold must have been sucked down into the Earth’s iron core, requiring an explanation as to how we still have some gold at or near the surface. The “Pluto-sized planet collision” theory supplies an explanation.

  • Jordan G Vela

    ‘GlidingPig,’ Good idea. However, the problem expressed in the article remains essentially the same in either situation. The arrangement you mentioned seems to only add a third object. Of course, I understand that all three massive objects involved (Earth, and perhaps two planetesimals) colliding simultaneously is a statistical impossibility. So, the two large objects would have had to collide in just the right way that the heavy contents of their cores would rain over Earth’s crust (a similar situation revealed by Melosh to be difficult enough) and then still avoid tainting the Lunar surface, that is, if you wanted to consider massive collisions at greater radii. Persistently, it seems that something greater is at play here.

  • Doug Batchelder

    Or — an open mind would be willing to postulate this — this is the way God made it.
    What a concept.

  • JMW

    This explanation should also account for the fact that the deepest gold mines are almost 4 km deep. Most if not all of these are located in South Africa. Would this then be the point of contact?

  • s

    Surface level gold can be easily explained by tectonic movements/volcanoes.

  • tiddas

    @Doug Batchelder or, a really open mind would notice the compelling evidence that this means that God hates us and wants us to destroy the planet we are on by toxic mining for glittery googaws. No life in the universe, onward fools!


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.

See More

Collapse bottom bar