<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Devastated Brown Bats Could Earn Endangered Species Protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/12/29/devastated-brown-bats-could-earn-endangered-species-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/12/29/devastated-brown-bats-could-earn-endangered-species-protection/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/12/29/devastated-brown-bats-could-earn-endangered-species-protection/#comment-24480</link>
		<dc:creator>Gar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 05:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=24280#comment-24480</guid>
		<description>It would seem that my initial post regarding the bats was unacceptable. Stating that they are unfit to remain on the planet because they can&#039;t adapt fast enough to any changes in theor environment is too harsh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem that my initial post regarding the bats was unacceptable. Stating that they are unfit to remain on the planet because they can&#8217;t adapt fast enough to any changes in theor environment is too harsh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoffrey Frasz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/12/29/devastated-brown-bats-could-earn-endangered-species-protection/#comment-24479</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoffrey Frasz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=24280#comment-24479</guid>
		<description>I noticed that connection too and I am glad for John&#039;s hypotheses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that connection too and I am glad for John&#8217;s hypotheses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/12/29/devastated-brown-bats-could-earn-endangered-species-protection/#comment-24478</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=24280#comment-24478</guid>
		<description>If something can be done to protect little brown bats, well, go ahead and do it.  But since this disease is, apparently, at least, a natural occurance and not something people are doing (unlike, say, hunting them) I don&#039;t see what listing them can do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If something can be done to protect little brown bats, well, go ahead and do it.  But since this disease is, apparently, at least, a natural occurance and not something people are doing (unlike, say, hunting them) I don&#8217;t see what listing them can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lerch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/12/29/devastated-brown-bats-could-earn-endangered-species-protection/#comment-24477</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lerch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=24280#comment-24477</guid>
		<description>This connects with a post yesterday that 98.1 degrees is the ideal for balancing metabolic cost and lowered resistance to fungi.  Presumably hibernation lowers the temps so the fungus can invade.    It seems to me that either these bats have lost an extra protection against fungus or global warming has allowed a vector animal to carry the fungus later in the fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This connects with a post yesterday that 98.1 degrees is the ideal for balancing metabolic cost and lowered resistance to fungi.  Presumably hibernation lowers the temps so the fungus can invade.    It seems to me that either these bats have lost an extra protection against fungus or global warming has allowed a vector animal to carry the fungus later in the fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
