<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy New Year, Planet! EPA Rules on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Take Effect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/03/happy-new-year-planet-epa-rules-on-greenhouse-gas-emissions-take-effect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/03/happy-new-year-planet-epa-rules-on-greenhouse-gas-emissions-take-effect/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: happy smile</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/03/happy-new-year-planet-epa-rules-on-greenhouse-gas-emissions-take-effect/#comment-24505</link>
		<dc:creator>happy smile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 02:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=24314#comment-24505</guid>
		<description>&#124;&#124;  &lt;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>||  &lt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/03/happy-new-year-planet-epa-rules-on-greenhouse-gas-emissions-take-effect/#comment-24504</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 01:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=24314#comment-24504</guid>
		<description>Daniel,

Please note what happened in the U.S. Congress today:

http://my.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=20110106/a1362173-928b-4246-822a-d34eb81be5c1

Note towards the bottom of the article, what one Congresswoman said:

 &quot;Capito called the EPA&#039;s actions a power grab that would have devastating effects on the economy. Without congressional action to say otherwise, the EPA will continue to dismantle energy and manufacturing industries through regulation,&quot; she said.

Gosh, I guess this makes several hundred Congressmen &quot;ranting paranoid lunatics&quot;, just like me, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,</p>
<p>Please note what happened in the U.S. Congress today:</p>
<p><a href="http://my.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=20110106/a1362173-928b-4246-822a-d34eb81be5c1" rel="nofollow">http://my.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=20110106/a1362173-928b-4246-822a-d34eb81be5c1</a></p>
<p>Note towards the bottom of the article, what one Congresswoman said:</p>
<p> &#8220;Capito called the EPA&#8217;s actions a power grab that would have devastating effects on the economy. Without congressional action to say otherwise, the EPA will continue to dismantle energy and manufacturing industries through regulation,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>Gosh, I guess this makes several hundred Congressmen &#8220;ranting paranoid lunatics&#8221;, just like me, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Andrews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/03/happy-new-year-planet-epa-rules-on-greenhouse-gas-emissions-take-effect/#comment-24503</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=24314#comment-24503</guid>
		<description>Wil...if you provide some reliable evidence for your statements, you&#039;re less likely to come across as a ranting paranoid lunatic repeating disinformation heard from some factually-challenged  radio/tv host, and whose post is just too silly to even discuss. You don&#039;t even know what &quot;marxist&quot; actually means, and that should have been the easiest thing to get right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wil&#8230;if you provide some reliable evidence for your statements, you&#8217;re less likely to come across as a ranting paranoid lunatic repeating disinformation heard from some factually-challenged  radio/tv host, and whose post is just too silly to even discuss. You don&#8217;t even know what &#8220;marxist&#8221; actually means, and that should have been the easiest thing to get right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/03/happy-new-year-planet-epa-rules-on-greenhouse-gas-emissions-take-effect/#comment-24502</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 08:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=24314#comment-24502</guid>
		<description>Since producing CO2 is an intrinsic requirement of all non-renewable energy technologies known to man, regulating it is really nothing but an enormous, arrogant power grab by unelected and utterly unaccountable bureaucrats, who have no expertise in power generation what-so-ever.

It is like regulating clothing companies by restricting access to all known fabrics for no good reason, or regulating food companies by restricting access to all known edible substances for no particular reason. It is like telling your teenage son &quot;Sure, you can drive the family car as much as you want. You just have to hold your breath for as long as you are behind the wheel&quot;.   All these things are profoundly dishonest and completely irrational.

Global Warming (if it exists at all) may or may not have some negative consequences, many decades from now. But these fanatical bureaurats want to intentionally and needlessly damage many American industries beginning this year.

Since no other nations are following suit, shouldn&#039;t the EPA at least be asked what atmospheric benefits the billions of dollars in intentional damage will have for the U.S. or the world? Won&#039;t the increase in CO2 emissions from India and China alone, more than offset the reductions caused by these regulations? Are we all idiots now? Isn&#039;t anybody allowed to ask obvious, rational questions in America any more?

Even teenage children can quickly see that the ONLY consequences these regulations will have, is to bring the U.S. to its knees economically. But perhaps that is the real motivation of our current marxist EPA bureaucrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since producing CO2 is an intrinsic requirement of all non-renewable energy technologies known to man, regulating it is really nothing but an enormous, arrogant power grab by unelected and utterly unaccountable bureaucrats, who have no expertise in power generation what-so-ever.</p>
<p>It is like regulating clothing companies by restricting access to all known fabrics for no good reason, or regulating food companies by restricting access to all known edible substances for no particular reason. It is like telling your teenage son &#8220;Sure, you can drive the family car as much as you want. You just have to hold your breath for as long as you are behind the wheel&#8221;.   All these things are profoundly dishonest and completely irrational.</p>
<p>Global Warming (if it exists at all) may or may not have some negative consequences, many decades from now. But these fanatical bureaurats want to intentionally and needlessly damage many American industries beginning this year.</p>
<p>Since no other nations are following suit, shouldn&#8217;t the EPA at least be asked what atmospheric benefits the billions of dollars in intentional damage will have for the U.S. or the world? Won&#8217;t the increase in CO2 emissions from India and China alone, more than offset the reductions caused by these regulations? Are we all idiots now? Isn&#8217;t anybody allowed to ask obvious, rational questions in America any more?</p>
<p>Even teenage children can quickly see that the ONLY consequences these regulations will have, is to bring the U.S. to its knees economically. But perhaps that is the real motivation of our current marxist EPA bureaucrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lerch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/03/happy-new-year-planet-epa-rules-on-greenhouse-gas-emissions-take-effect/#comment-24501</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lerch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=24314#comment-24501</guid>
		<description>I hope that the new regs don&#039;t require a permit for plant modifications whose sole effect would be to cut CO2 emissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that the new regs don&#8217;t require a permit for plant modifications whose sole effect would be to cut CO2 emissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crow</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/03/happy-new-year-planet-epa-rules-on-greenhouse-gas-emissions-take-effect/#comment-24500</link>
		<dc:creator>Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=24314#comment-24500</guid>
		<description>Climate change - it&#039;s got people talking.
http://www.nicky510.com/comic/its-all-a-matter-of-degree/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate change &#8211; it&#8217;s got people talking.<br />
<a href="http://www.nicky510.com/comic/its-all-a-matter-of-degree/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nicky510.com/comic/its-all-a-matter-of-degree/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/03/happy-new-year-planet-epa-rules-on-greenhouse-gas-emissions-take-effect/#comment-24499</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 02:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=24314#comment-24499</guid>
		<description>Good!  Less pollution = better.  Simple as that.  Climate change or not, regardless of your views, its only a good thing to lower all the crud we are spewing into our very thin atmosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good!  Less pollution = better.  Simple as that.  Climate change or not, regardless of your views, its only a good thing to lower all the crud we are spewing into our very thin atmosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
