<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re About to Run Out of IP Addresses. Is It Time to Panic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/25/were-about-to-run-out-of-ip-addresses-is-it-time-to-panic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/25/were-about-to-run-out-of-ip-addresses-is-it-time-to-panic/</link>
	<description>80beats is DISCOVER&#039;s news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day&#039;s most compelling topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:57:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tory Eyler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/25/were-about-to-run-out-of-ip-addresses-is-it-time-to-panic/comment-page-1/#comment-1310177</link>
		<dc:creator>Tory Eyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=25347#comment-1310177</guid>
		<description>Youcompletedsome valid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youcompletedsome valid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John@ Vancouver WA Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/25/were-about-to-run-out-of-ip-addresses-is-it-time-to-panic/comment-page-1/#comment-606809</link>
		<dc:creator>John@ Vancouver WA Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=25347#comment-606809</guid>
		<description>I once worked for the Old Telephone industry, where prior to the breakup of AT&amp;T the industry thought they had enough Area Codes to last many generations.  The high cost to enable &quot;number portability&quot; for phone numbers was necessary, and very beneficial.  Let&#039;s go ahead and implement IPv6; and maybe convert to the metric system in the USA at the same time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once worked for the Old Telephone industry, where prior to the breakup of AT&amp;T the industry thought they had enough Area Codes to last many generations.  The high cost to enable &#8220;number portability&#8221; for phone numbers was necessary, and very beneficial.  Let&#8217;s go ahead and implement IPv6; and maybe convert to the metric system in the USA at the same time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/25/were-about-to-run-out-of-ip-addresses-is-it-time-to-panic/comment-page-1/#comment-605984</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 05:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=25347#comment-605984</guid>
		<description>The internet was a *LOT* smaller when it switched to IPv4, way back in 1981. Back then they could just declare a day to switch, and everyone switched that day, with the old version no longer supported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The internet was a *LOT* smaller when it switched to IPv4, way back in 1981. Back then they could just declare a day to switch, and everyone switched that day, with the old version no longer supported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/25/were-about-to-run-out-of-ip-addresses-is-it-time-to-panic/comment-page-1/#comment-605981</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 05:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=25347#comment-605981</guid>
		<description>The internet moved to IPv4 back when there were hundreds of computers on the internet and attaching 4.3 billion seemed ridiculous so as to be laughable to even create a 32-bit system in the first place. I bet people were bitching about the extra memory a 16-bit system would free up and burden on communications those extra 16 bits would force upon the world. 

What we should really be thinking about, however, is how to future proof v6 so that when we need to transition to v8 it will be built into the spec...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The internet moved to IPv4 back when there were hundreds of computers on the internet and attaching 4.3 billion seemed ridiculous so as to be laughable to even create a 32-bit system in the first place. I bet people were bitching about the extra memory a 16-bit system would free up and burden on communications those extra 16 bits would force upon the world. </p>
<p>What we should really be thinking about, however, is how to future proof v6 so that when we need to transition to v8 it will be built into the spec&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianDH</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/25/were-about-to-run-out-of-ip-addresses-is-it-time-to-panic/comment-page-1/#comment-605979</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianDH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 05:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=25347#comment-605979</guid>
		<description>@Relativity

Put simply: IPv4 was standardized in 1981 -- there was not nearly as much infrastructure to migrate back then, nor was it nearly as economically significant.

Also, the nomenclature is a bit odd; though there were roughly analogous protocols, IPv1-3 never actually existed under those names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Relativity</p>
<p>Put simply: IPv4 was standardized in 1981 &#8212; there was not nearly as much infrastructure to migrate back then, nor was it nearly as economically significant.</p>
<p>Also, the nomenclature is a bit odd; though there were roughly analogous protocols, IPv1-3 never actually existed under those names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Relativity</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/25/were-about-to-run-out-of-ip-addresses-is-it-time-to-panic/comment-page-1/#comment-605667</link>
		<dc:creator>Relativity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=25347#comment-605667</guid>
		<description>Oops, OK typo-Nazis, that should read: &quot;So, why can&#039;t we do it now to IPv6?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, OK typo-Nazis, that should read: &#8220;So, why can&#8217;t we do it now to IPv6?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Relativity</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/25/were-about-to-run-out-of-ip-addresses-is-it-time-to-panic/comment-page-1/#comment-605662</link>
		<dc:creator>Relativity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=25347#comment-605662</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t this happen before? So, what happened when the Internet moved from IPv1 to IPv2 to IPv3 to IPv4? So, why can&#039;t we do it not to IPv6?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t this happen before? So, what happened when the Internet moved from IPv1 to IPv2 to IPv3 to IPv4? So, why can&#8217;t we do it not to IPv6?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Too</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/01/25/were-about-to-run-out-of-ip-addresses-is-it-time-to-panic/comment-page-1/#comment-605631</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=25347#comment-605631</guid>
		<description>The IPv6 project has been easy to put off.  As the article says, established organizations have long since acquired a block of IP addresses and they often have plenty for internal use.

A secondary reason has been the long life of Windows XP.  XP does not have IPv6 support and it will not be upgraded to do so.  That support exists in Vista and Win7.  Now that those newer operating systems (Win7 particularly) are getting strong uptake, a barrier to IPv6 is slowly but surely being chipped away.

A few organizations are going to get caught in the pinch.  Most will upgrade as part of standard evergreening/modernization initiatives, I believe.  This will not be the next Y2K event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IPv6 project has been easy to put off.  As the article says, established organizations have long since acquired a block of IP addresses and they often have plenty for internal use.</p>
<p>A secondary reason has been the long life of Windows XP.  XP does not have IPv6 support and it will not be upgraded to do so.  That support exists in Vista and Win7.  Now that those newer operating systems (Win7 particularly) are getting strong uptake, a barrier to IPv6 is slowly but surely being chipped away.</p>
<p>A few organizations are going to get caught in the pinch.  Most will upgrade as part of standard evergreening/modernization initiatives, I believe.  This will not be the next Y2K event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-23 15:38:32 -->
