Orangutan Genome: The Orange Apes Evolved at Their Own Quirky Pace

By Andrew Moseman | January 27, 2011 1:10 pm

Welcome to the family of critters with sequenced genomes, orangutans. In Nature this week, scientists unveil the draft DNA sequencing of our great ape cousins—the only great apes that live exclusively in Asia.

The researchers assembled the draft genome of the female Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii) using a whole-genome “shotgun” strategy, an old-fashioned approach that cost about $20 million. In addition, the researchers gathered sequence data from five wild Sumatran orangutans and five Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) using a faster and thousandfold cheaper next-generation platform. [LiveScience]

What did scientists find in there? For one thing, orangutans share about 97 percent of the their genome with humans, compared to the 99 percent we famously share with chimpanzees. The two orangutan species—inhabiting the Indonesian islands of Borneo and Sumatra—diverged about 400,000 years ago, lead author Devin Locke says. That’s much more recently than scientists had thought.

They also discovered that over the last 15 million years, orangutan DNA changed at a different rate than either ours or chimps’. Orangutans have undergone fewer mutations of the DNA, have a lower gene turnover rate, and have fewer duplicated DNA segments.

“That doesn’t mean the species itself has evolved more slowly, but that this particular mechanism of genome evolution has been proceeding at a lower rate,” Locke said. “Humans and chimps, in sharp contrast, have experienced an acceleration in this form of evolution over the past 5 million years or so.” [LiveScience]

That’s not the only peculiarity they found:

While in 2004 there were about only 7,000 Sumatran orangutans left in the wild, the researchers found that their population is actually much more genetically diverse than the 50,000 Bornean orangutans in the wild. Why the Sumatran orangutans are so much more genetically diverse is unknown. [USA Today]

As scientists use the new data to sort out the difference between the two remaining orangutan groups—and what their evolution says about all of us primates—they can simultaneously use it to figure out how best to protect them.

Knowing about their genetic diversity can help zoos and conservationists preserve and protect the species, Locke said. For instance, the Borneo and Sumatran species of orangutans should likely not be interbred, and genetically diverse populations are usually more likely to survive. In turn, the study has implications for human health. Inherited diseases are often linked to duplications in the DNA sequence that orangutans lack, Locke said. [Reuters]

Related Content:
80beats: Lice DNA Reveals When Humans First Clothed Their Nakedness
80beats: 4 Messages a Pantomiming Orangutan Might Be Trying to Convey
80beats: An Active Orangutan Burns Fewer Calories Than a Lazy Human
80beats: Study: Orangutans Play Leaf Instruments to Fool Predators
80beats: Syncopated Rhythm Makes Orangutans Masterful Swingers

Image: flickr / ltshears

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Human Origins, Living World
  • vickie98531

    Wouldn’t this explain how all primates – including humans – are so diverse? Isn’t it possible that humans have also evolved separate of each other explaining how there is so much diversity among us? Even a slightly different – and more difficult to detect – evolution would shed light on our genetic diversities thereby allowing for so many humans with so many differences such as Pigmies, African Americans, and Asians to name a few? I believe this is the way we have evolved all the way throughout time. Simple adjustments of time could easily explain many differences.

  • Bob

    Vickie… Actually, there is very little diversity among human beings. Surprisingly little, far less than in most species. Scientists have surmised that humanity went through a near-extinction event at some point, which narrowed the gene pool.

    Studies have also shown persistent global mixing of the human gene pool throughout human pre-history — which also did a lot to prevent significant regional differences in our genes. In other words, human beings have a persistent wanderlust that we don’t always find in other species.

    There is little correlation between what we perceive today as race, and actual genetic diversity. Most differences that we attribute to race are encoded in a vanishingly small number of genes — about 20. There is far more variation WITHIN each “race” than between them. And not surprisingly, there is more variation in Africa than anywhere else.

    Conclusion: race is not a biologically definable category. These characteristics (eg, skin color) are just a few (minor) traits, among many (eg, baldness) — ones that we put a lot of social significance in.


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.

See More

Collapse bottom bar